Skip to content

Randomized Study of Physiological vs Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Normal Ventricular Function Post TAVI

Ranodmized Study of Physiological vs Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Normal Ventricular Function Post TAVI (PHYSTAVI II)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06197503
Acronym
PHYSTAVIII
Enrollment
48
Registered
2024-01-09
Start date
2023-11-30
Completion date
2026-12-15
Last updated
2026-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AV Block, Physiological Pacing, Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function, Right Ventricular Pacing, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Brief summary

Single-center randomized trial in patients with pacing indication (AV block) after TAVI (transfemoral aortic valve implantation) and LVEF\> 50%, that aims to study the percentage of patients who improve at 12 months in a combined clinical endpoint.

Detailed description

There is currently no evidence of the best mode of definitive pacing after TAVI in patients with preserved systolic ventricular function and AV block. Through this study, investigators intend to elucidate the best post TAVI pacing strategy, comparing the effect of right apical pacing vs. physiological pacing on the evolution of both echocardiographic and clinical parameters. Investigators will include 24 patients without ventricular dysfunction (LVEF\> 50%) and with AV block pacing indication after TAVI. Patients will be randomized to 2 types of pacing (parallel randomized trial): physiological or right ventricular pacing (conventional). PHYS-TAVI trial will analyze the following parameters in the 2 groups: survival; NYHA class; distance in the 6-minute walking test; hospital admissions; left ventricular function; echocardiographic asynchrony (strain and flash septal); NTproBNP; and quality of life/symptoms with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire test (KCCQ-12) Clinical, and echocardiographic follow-up will be performed for 1 year. Inclusion of 24 more patients to those already included in the context of PHYSTAVI I (NCT04482816). Exploratory trial.

Interventions

PROCEDUREConduction system pacing

Left bundle branch pacing or His bundle branch pacing

PROCEDURERight ventricular pacing

Conventional pacing

Sponsors

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Successful implantation of TAVI according to VARC-3 criteria. * Indication of cardiac pacing due to AV block according to ESC Guidelines. * LVEF\> 50%. * The patient must indicate their acceptance to participate in the study by signing an informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

* Ventricular dysfunction: LVEF \<50%. * Transapical TAVI. * Participating currently in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment. * Patients with left bundle branch block but without indication of pacing (AV block). * Life expectancy \<12 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical combined endpoint: survival; and improvement > 1 point in NYHA class or > 25% increase in the distance covered in the 6-minute walking test.12 monthsDetermine the percentage of patients who improve at 12 months on a clinical combined endpoint: survival; and improvement \> 1 point in NYHA class or \> 25% increase in the distance covered in the 6-minute walking test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction.12 months.Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF %) measured with Simpson method with echocardiography (Delta left ventricular ejection fraction: 12 months LVEF - baseline LVEF).
Correction of echocardiographic asynchrony: septal flash expressed in mm.30 days; 12 months.Correction of septal flash determined with echocardiography (M mode).
Distance covered in the 6-minute walking test.30 days; 12 months.Distance in meters walked in 6 minutes.
Change in NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class.30 days; 12 months.NYHA functional class I, II, III, IV.
Change in degree of mitral regurgitation.30 days; 12 months.Mitral regurgitation (MR) measured with echocardiography. The severity of MR graded as absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2), moderate-severe (3), or severe (4).
Change in NTproBNP.Baseline; 12 months.NTproBNP blood levels.
Hospitalization due to heart failure.12 months.Hospitalization: patient hospitalization (yes/no).
QRS duration.BaselineQRS duration (milliseconds) measured with a 12-lead ECG (200mm/s).
Score on quality of life/symptoms Questionnaire (KCCQ-12 Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire).30 days; 12 months.Score in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12: (higher=better).
Correction of global longitudinal strain30 days; 12 monthsGlobal longitudinal strain assessed with two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTLluís Mont, MD, PhD
lmont@clinic.cat93 2271778 Ext. 2094
STUDY_DIRECTORLluís Mont, MD, PhD

Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. IDIBAPS

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026