Skip to content

Effects of a Health Intervention on Fear of Hypoglycemia : a Pilot Study

Effects of a Health Education Intervention Based on the Behaviour Change Wheel on Fear of Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06197360
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-01-09
Start date
2021-08-01
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2025-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fear of Hypoglycemia, Health Education, Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia, Self-Management, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Fear of hypoglycemia, Behavior Change Wheel theory, Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia, Self-Management

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to construct a Fear of Hypoglycemia(FoH) intervention program for type 2 diabetic patients based on the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) theory and to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial effects of the program.

Detailed description

In this study, eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into an intervention group (health education based on BCW theory given on top of regular diabetes health education) and a control group (regular diabetes health education), with a 4-week intervention period and a 4-week follow-up period, for a total of 8 weeks.

Interventions

Questionnaire collection, face-to-face interview, and interpretation of the manual on the first day of admission; diabetes self-management teaching on the second day; and hypoglycemia-related lectures and hands-on teaching on the fourth day. Day 6 hypoglycemia fear case discussion. Face-to-face teaching and formulation of blood glucose management plan on the first day before discharge; WeChat push or telephone return visit one week and two weeks after discharge; WeChat push, telephone return visit and questionnaire collection three weeks after discharge.

BEHAVIORALGeneral diabetes health education

Patients were provided with regular medication guidance, dietary guidance, exercise guidance and popularization of related diabetes knowledge; regular daily blood glucose testing and recording; and timely answers to patients' clinical problems and psychological support.

Sponsors

Yangzhou University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Comply with the 2020 Chinese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus * Age ≥18 years * Duration of diabetes mellitus ≥1 year * FOH according to the elevated item endorsement criterion (E I criterion): ≥3 points on any item of the Hypoglycemic Fear-Worry Scale (HFS-WS) * Patients who have the ability to listen, read, write, walk, and cooperate to complete the study * Patients who have a smart phone, and can skillfully use WeChat or telephone to communicate * Voluntarily participate in this study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with comorbid acute complications or other serious diseases or disorders of consciousness, such as diabetic hypertonic state, tumors, coma, etc. * Patients with comorbid psychiatric diseases or taking psychotropic drugs * Patients who have recently or are participating in other studies on similar topics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypoglycemia Fear BehavioralBaseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-upHypoglycemia Fear Survey - Behavior Scale consists of 19 entries and is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5, with total scores ranging from 15 (lowest) to 95 (highest), with the higher scores indicating that the patients' hypoglycemia fear-behavior is more pronounced, and the higher the level of fear of hypoglycemia.
Hypoglycemia Fear WorryBaseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-upHypoglycemic fear Survey - Worry Scale was used to evaluate the patients' hypoglycemic feelings in the past 6 months. There were 13 items in the scale, using 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from low to high 0-4, and the total score ranging from 0 (lowest) to 52 (highest). The higher the score, the higher the patient's fear of hypoglycemia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gold RatingBaseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-upGold Score was first proposed by Professor Gold in the UK in 1994. It is the most commonly used assessment method for Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia, which reflects patients' awareness of hypoglycemia at the same time. The only question with this approach is, Do you know when your low blood sugar started? Likert scores 7 on a scale of 1 (always aware) to 7 (never aware), with an overall score from 1 (lowest) to 7 (highest). An overall score of 1-3 is considered normal hypoglycemic self-awareness, and a score of ≥4 indicates the presence of IAH.
The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC)Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-upThe Patient Assessment Chronic Care Scale was developed with support from the Johnson Foundation to assess the quality of care provided by healthcare organizations. Patients use this scale to report their perceived level of medical support. The PACIC scale consists of five dimensions and 20 questions, each of which is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5), with higher scores (close to 5) indicating greater support from healthcare professionals. The score for each dimension is calculated based on the average score of the items it contains, and the total table score is calculated based on the average score of all 20 items, with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5. Total scale score ≤1.75 is classified as low level of medical support; An overall average score of 1.75 to 3.5 indicates moderate medical support; Total mean score ≥3.5 was classified as high medical support.
The Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes PatientsBaseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-upThe Self-Management Attitude Scale for Diabetic Patients is a sub-scale of the Self-Management Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior Assessment Scale for Diabetic Patients compiled by the Chinese Center for Prevention and Control of Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases (CPCNCD). The scale included five items that assessed patients' attitudes toward diabetes health education, diet control, physical activity, medication adherence, and blood glucose monitoring. The 5-point Likert scale was used, with 1 indicating very important and 5 indicating very unimportant, and the scores were divided into 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 in order from low to high. The total score of the five items is the total self-management attitude score (range 1-5), and a score below 3.0 indicates a poor self-management attitude. A score of 3.0 to 4.25 indicates an average self-management attitude, while a score of 4.25 or above indicates a good self-management attitude.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Declined to participate (n= 11) Too busy (n= 3) Too sick (n= 2) Not interested (n= 6)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
General Diabetes Health Education
Patients were provided with regular medication guidance, dietary guidance, exercise guidance and popularization of related diabetes knowledge; regular daily blood glucose testing and recording; and timely answers to patients' clinical problems and psychological support. General diabetes health education: Patients were provided with regular medication guidance, dietary guidance, exercise guidance and popularization of related diabetes knowledge; regular daily blood glucose testing and recording; and timely answers to patients' clinical problems and psychological support.
25
Based on BCW Theory of Health Education
A FOH intervention program based on BCW theory was implemented on top of the control group. Based on BCW Theory of Health Education: Questionnaire collection, face-to-face interview, and interpretation of the manual on the first day of admission; diabetes self-management teaching on the second day; and hypoglycemia-related lectures and hands-on teaching on the fourth day. Day 6 hypoglycemia fear case discussion. Face-to-face teaching and formulation of blood glucose management plan on the first day before discharge; WeChat push or telephone return visit one week and two weeks after discharge; WeChat push, telephone return visit and questionnaire collection three weeks after discharge.
25
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBased on BCW Theory of Health EducationTotalGeneral Diabetes Health Education
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
13 Participants29 Participants16 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants18 Participants7 Participants
BMI(kg/m^2)
<18.5
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
BMI(kg/m^2)
18.5~23.9
19 Participants33 Participants14 Participants
BMI(kg/m^2)
24~28
5 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
BMI(kg/m^2)
≥28
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
25 participants50 participants25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants31 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants19 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Hypoglycemia Fear Behavioral

Hypoglycemia Fear Survey - Behavior Scale consists of 19 entries and is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5, with total scores ranging from 15 (lowest) to 95 (highest), with the higher scores indicating that the patients' hypoglycemia fear-behavior is more pronounced, and the higher the level of fear of hypoglycemia.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
General Diabetes Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear BehavioralBaseline59.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.61
General Diabetes Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear BehavioralImmediately after the intervention57.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.33
General Diabetes Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear BehavioralAfter the 4 weeks follow-up55.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.68
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear BehavioralBaseline63.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.63
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear BehavioralImmediately after the intervention44.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.59
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear BehavioralAfter the 4 weeks follow-up39.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.34
Primary

Hypoglycemia Fear Worry

Hypoglycemic fear Survey - Worry Scale was used to evaluate the patients' hypoglycemic feelings in the past 6 months. There were 13 items in the scale, using 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from low to high 0-4, and the total score ranging from 0 (lowest) to 52 (highest). The higher the score, the higher the patient's fear of hypoglycemia.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
General Diabetes Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear WorryBaseline32.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.09
General Diabetes Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear WorryImmediately after the intervention29.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
General Diabetes Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear WorryAfter the 4 weeks follow-up27.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.15
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear WorryBaseline32.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear WorryImmediately after the intervention18.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.63
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationHypoglycemia Fear WorryAfter the 4 weeks follow-up15.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.38
Secondary

Gold Rating

Gold Score was first proposed by Professor Gold in the UK in 1994. It is the most commonly used assessment method for Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia, which reflects patients' awareness of hypoglycemia at the same time. The only question with this approach is, Do you know when your low blood sugar started? Likert scores 7 on a scale of 1 (always aware) to 7 (never aware), with an overall score from 1 (lowest) to 7 (highest). An overall score of 1-3 is considered normal hypoglycemic self-awareness, and a score of ≥4 indicates the presence of IAH.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
General Diabetes Health EducationGold RatingBaseline2.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
General Diabetes Health EducationGold RatingImmediately after the intervention2.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
General Diabetes Health EducationGold RatingAfter the 4 weeks follow-up1.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationGold RatingImmediately after the intervention1.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationGold RatingBaseline2.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationGold RatingAfter the 4 weeks follow-up1.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Secondary

The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC)

The Patient Assessment Chronic Care Scale was developed with support from the Johnson Foundation to assess the quality of care provided by healthcare organizations. Patients use this scale to report their perceived level of medical support. The PACIC scale consists of five dimensions and 20 questions, each of which is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5), with higher scores (close to 5) indicating greater support from healthcare professionals. The score for each dimension is calculated based on the average score of the items it contains, and the total table score is calculated based on the average score of all 20 items, with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5. Total scale score ≤1.75 is classified as low level of medical support; An overall average score of 1.75 to 3.5 indicates moderate medical support; Total mean score ≥3.5 was classified as high medical support.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
General Diabetes Health EducationThe Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC)Baseline3.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
General Diabetes Health EducationThe Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC)Immediately after the intervention3.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
General Diabetes Health EducationThe Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC)After the 4 weeks follow-up3.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationThe Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC)Baseline3.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationThe Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC)Immediately after the intervention4.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationThe Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC)After the 4 weeks follow-up4.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

The Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes Patients

The Self-Management Attitude Scale for Diabetic Patients is a sub-scale of the Self-Management Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior Assessment Scale for Diabetic Patients compiled by the Chinese Center for Prevention and Control of Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases (CPCNCD). The scale included five items that assessed patients' attitudes toward diabetes health education, diet control, physical activity, medication adherence, and blood glucose monitoring. The 5-point Likert scale was used, with 1 indicating very important and 5 indicating very unimportant, and the scores were divided into 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 in order from low to high. The total score of the five items is the total self-management attitude score (range 1-5), and a score below 3.0 indicates a poor self-management attitude. A score of 3.0 to 4.25 indicates an average self-management attitude, while a score of 4.25 or above indicates a good self-management attitude.

Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
General Diabetes Health EducationThe Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes PatientsBaseline3.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
General Diabetes Health EducationThe Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes PatientsImmediately after the intervention4.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
General Diabetes Health EducationThe Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes PatientsAfter the 4 weeks follow-up4.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationThe Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes PatientsBaseline4.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationThe Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes PatientsImmediately after the intervention4.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Based on BCW Theory of Health EducationThe Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes PatientsAfter the 4 weeks follow-up4.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026