Fear of Hypoglycemia, Health Education, Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia, Self-Management, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Conditions
Keywords
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Fear of hypoglycemia, Behavior Change Wheel theory, Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia, Self-Management
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to construct a Fear of Hypoglycemia(FoH) intervention program for type 2 diabetic patients based on the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) theory and to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial effects of the program.
Detailed description
In this study, eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into an intervention group (health education based on BCW theory given on top of regular diabetes health education) and a control group (regular diabetes health education), with a 4-week intervention period and a 4-week follow-up period, for a total of 8 weeks.
Interventions
Questionnaire collection, face-to-face interview, and interpretation of the manual on the first day of admission; diabetes self-management teaching on the second day; and hypoglycemia-related lectures and hands-on teaching on the fourth day. Day 6 hypoglycemia fear case discussion. Face-to-face teaching and formulation of blood glucose management plan on the first day before discharge; WeChat push or telephone return visit one week and two weeks after discharge; WeChat push, telephone return visit and questionnaire collection three weeks after discharge.
Patients were provided with regular medication guidance, dietary guidance, exercise guidance and popularization of related diabetes knowledge; regular daily blood glucose testing and recording; and timely answers to patients' clinical problems and psychological support.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Comply with the 2020 Chinese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus * Age ≥18 years * Duration of diabetes mellitus ≥1 year * FOH according to the elevated item endorsement criterion (E I criterion): ≥3 points on any item of the Hypoglycemic Fear-Worry Scale (HFS-WS) * Patients who have the ability to listen, read, write, walk, and cooperate to complete the study * Patients who have a smart phone, and can skillfully use WeChat or telephone to communicate * Voluntarily participate in this study and sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with comorbid acute complications or other serious diseases or disorders of consciousness, such as diabetic hypertonic state, tumors, coma, etc. * Patients with comorbid psychiatric diseases or taking psychotropic drugs * Patients who have recently or are participating in other studies on similar topics
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hypoglycemia Fear Behavioral | Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up | Hypoglycemia Fear Survey - Behavior Scale consists of 19 entries and is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5, with total scores ranging from 15 (lowest) to 95 (highest), with the higher scores indicating that the patients' hypoglycemia fear-behavior is more pronounced, and the higher the level of fear of hypoglycemia. |
| Hypoglycemia Fear Worry | Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up | Hypoglycemic fear Survey - Worry Scale was used to evaluate the patients' hypoglycemic feelings in the past 6 months. There were 13 items in the scale, using 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from low to high 0-4, and the total score ranging from 0 (lowest) to 52 (highest). The higher the score, the higher the patient's fear of hypoglycemia. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Gold Rating | Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up | Gold Score was first proposed by Professor Gold in the UK in 1994. It is the most commonly used assessment method for Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia, which reflects patients' awareness of hypoglycemia at the same time. The only question with this approach is, Do you know when your low blood sugar started? Likert scores 7 on a scale of 1 (always aware) to 7 (never aware), with an overall score from 1 (lowest) to 7 (highest). An overall score of 1-3 is considered normal hypoglycemic self-awareness, and a score of ≥4 indicates the presence of IAH. |
| The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC) | Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up | The Patient Assessment Chronic Care Scale was developed with support from the Johnson Foundation to assess the quality of care provided by healthcare organizations. Patients use this scale to report their perceived level of medical support. The PACIC scale consists of five dimensions and 20 questions, each of which is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5), with higher scores (close to 5) indicating greater support from healthcare professionals. The score for each dimension is calculated based on the average score of the items it contains, and the total table score is calculated based on the average score of all 20 items, with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5. Total scale score ≤1.75 is classified as low level of medical support; An overall average score of 1.75 to 3.5 indicates moderate medical support; Total mean score ≥3.5 was classified as high medical support. |
| The Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes Patients | Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up | The Self-Management Attitude Scale for Diabetic Patients is a sub-scale of the Self-Management Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior Assessment Scale for Diabetic Patients compiled by the Chinese Center for Prevention and Control of Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases (CPCNCD). The scale included five items that assessed patients' attitudes toward diabetes health education, diet control, physical activity, medication adherence, and blood glucose monitoring. The 5-point Likert scale was used, with 1 indicating very important and 5 indicating very unimportant, and the scores were divided into 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 in order from low to high. The total score of the five items is the total self-management attitude score (range 1-5), and a score below 3.0 indicates a poor self-management attitude. A score of 3.0 to 4.25 indicates an average self-management attitude, while a score of 4.25 or above indicates a good self-management attitude. |
Countries
China
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Declined to participate (n= 11) Too busy (n= 3) Too sick (n= 2) Not interested (n= 6)
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| General Diabetes Health Education Patients were provided with regular medication guidance, dietary guidance, exercise guidance and popularization of related diabetes knowledge; regular daily blood glucose testing and recording; and timely answers to patients' clinical problems and psychological support.
General diabetes health education: Patients were provided with regular medication guidance, dietary guidance, exercise guidance and popularization of related diabetes knowledge; regular daily blood glucose testing and recording; and timely answers to patients' clinical problems and psychological support. | 25 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education A FOH intervention program based on BCW theory was implemented on top of the control group.
Based on BCW Theory of Health Education: Questionnaire collection, face-to-face interview, and interpretation of the manual on the first day of admission; diabetes self-management teaching on the second day; and hypoglycemia-related lectures and hands-on teaching on the fourth day. Day 6 hypoglycemia fear case discussion. Face-to-face teaching and formulation of blood glucose management plan on the first day before discharge; WeChat push or telephone return visit one week and two weeks after discharge; WeChat push, telephone return visit and questionnaire collection three weeks after discharge. | 25 |
| Total | 50 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | Total | General Diabetes Health Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 13 Participants | 29 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 11 Participants | 18 Participants | 7 Participants |
| BMI(kg/m^2) <18.5 | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| BMI(kg/m^2) 18.5~23.9 | 19 Participants | 33 Participants | 14 Participants |
| BMI(kg/m^2) 24~28 | 5 Participants | 11 Participants | 6 Participants |
| BMI(kg/m^2) ≥28 | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment China | 25 participants | 50 participants | 25 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 15 Participants | 31 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 19 Participants | 9 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 25 | 0 / 25 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 25 | 0 / 25 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 25 | 0 / 25 |
Outcome results
Hypoglycemia Fear Behavioral
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey - Behavior Scale consists of 19 entries and is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5, with total scores ranging from 15 (lowest) to 95 (highest), with the higher scores indicating that the patients' hypoglycemia fear-behavior is more pronounced, and the higher the level of fear of hypoglycemia.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Diabetes Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Behavioral | Baseline | 59.60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.61 |
| General Diabetes Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Behavioral | Immediately after the intervention | 57.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.33 |
| General Diabetes Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Behavioral | After the 4 weeks follow-up | 55.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.68 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Behavioral | Baseline | 63.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.63 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Behavioral | Immediately after the intervention | 44.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.59 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Behavioral | After the 4 weeks follow-up | 39.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.34 |
Hypoglycemia Fear Worry
Hypoglycemic fear Survey - Worry Scale was used to evaluate the patients' hypoglycemic feelings in the past 6 months. There were 13 items in the scale, using 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from low to high 0-4, and the total score ranging from 0 (lowest) to 52 (highest). The higher the score, the higher the patient's fear of hypoglycemia.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Diabetes Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Worry | Baseline | 32.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.09 |
| General Diabetes Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Worry | Immediately after the intervention | 29.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
| General Diabetes Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Worry | After the 4 weeks follow-up | 27.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.15 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Worry | Baseline | 32.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.89 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Worry | Immediately after the intervention | 18.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.63 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | Hypoglycemia Fear Worry | After the 4 weeks follow-up | 15.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.38 |
Gold Rating
Gold Score was first proposed by Professor Gold in the UK in 1994. It is the most commonly used assessment method for Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia, which reflects patients' awareness of hypoglycemia at the same time. The only question with this approach is, Do you know when your low blood sugar started? Likert scores 7 on a scale of 1 (always aware) to 7 (never aware), with an overall score from 1 (lowest) to 7 (highest). An overall score of 1-3 is considered normal hypoglycemic self-awareness, and a score of ≥4 indicates the presence of IAH.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Diabetes Health Education | Gold Rating | Baseline | 2.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.28 |
| General Diabetes Health Education | Gold Rating | Immediately after the intervention | 2.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.07 |
| General Diabetes Health Education | Gold Rating | After the 4 weeks follow-up | 1.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | Gold Rating | Immediately after the intervention | 1.68 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | Gold Rating | Baseline | 2.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.26 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | Gold Rating | After the 4 weeks follow-up | 1.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC)
The Patient Assessment Chronic Care Scale was developed with support from the Johnson Foundation to assess the quality of care provided by healthcare organizations. Patients use this scale to report their perceived level of medical support. The PACIC scale consists of five dimensions and 20 questions, each of which is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5), with higher scores (close to 5) indicating greater support from healthcare professionals. The score for each dimension is calculated based on the average score of the items it contains, and the total table score is calculated based on the average score of all 20 items, with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5. Total scale score ≤1.75 is classified as low level of medical support; An overall average score of 1.75 to 3.5 indicates moderate medical support; Total mean score ≥3.5 was classified as high medical support.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Diabetes Health Education | The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC) | Baseline | 3.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| General Diabetes Health Education | The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC) | Immediately after the intervention | 3.69 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| General Diabetes Health Education | The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC) | After the 4 weeks follow-up | 3.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC) | Baseline | 3.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC) | Immediately after the intervention | 4.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care( PACIC) | After the 4 weeks follow-up | 4.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
The Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes Patients
The Self-Management Attitude Scale for Diabetic Patients is a sub-scale of the Self-Management Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior Assessment Scale for Diabetic Patients compiled by the Chinese Center for Prevention and Control of Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases (CPCNCD). The scale included five items that assessed patients' attitudes toward diabetes health education, diet control, physical activity, medication adherence, and blood glucose monitoring. The 5-point Likert scale was used, with 1 indicating very important and 5 indicating very unimportant, and the scores were divided into 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 in order from low to high. The total score of the five items is the total self-management attitude score (range 1-5), and a score below 3.0 indicates a poor self-management attitude. A score of 3.0 to 4.25 indicates an average self-management attitude, while a score of 4.25 or above indicates a good self-management attitude.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and after the 4 weeks follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Diabetes Health Education | The Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes Patients | Baseline | 3.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| General Diabetes Health Education | The Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes Patients | Immediately after the intervention | 4.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| General Diabetes Health Education | The Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes Patients | After the 4 weeks follow-up | 4.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | The Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes Patients | Baseline | 4.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | The Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes Patients | Immediately after the intervention | 4.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| Based on BCW Theory of Health Education | The Self-management Attitude Scale for Diabetes Patients | After the 4 weeks follow-up | 4.83 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.19 |