Skip to content

Visceral Osteopathy in Functional Constipation

The Effectiveness of Visceral Osteopathy in Functional Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06196073
Enrollment
18
Registered
2024-01-09
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Constipation

Keywords

Functional constipatiton, Visceral, osteopathy

Brief summary

It is a functional bowel disease characterized by excessive straining during defecation, infrequent defecation, and the feeling of incomplete evacuation. There are very few studies investigating the incidence and prevalence of functional constipation.Non-pharmacological treatment methods, including lifestyle changes, are primarily recommended for the treatment of constipation. The aim of the study is to examine the effects of visceral osteopathic approaches on individuals diagnosed with functional constipation and compare them with conventional methods.

Detailed description

Non-pharmacological treatment methods, including lifestyle changes, are primarily recommended for the treatment of constipation. In cases where success is not achieved with this method, pharmacological agents, biofeedback and surgical treatment methods can be applied depending on the severity of constipation. Lifestyle changes include increasing fiber and fluid intake and regular physical activity Osteopathic manual therapy (OMT) is the examination and treatment of the function of the neuromusculoskeletal system anatomy using non-invasive, generally safe manual techniques to improve functional body mechanics such as joint range of motion, muscle tone, circulation, body fluid pressures and exchanges, and nerve impulses. OMT is used for autonomic system regulation, balancing pelvic muscle tone, increasing gastrointestinal motility, preventing myofascial limitations and increasing the pump effect of the diaphragm (5,6). The positive effects of OMT on the microbiome are available in the literature. Alternative treatments are needed because the costs of combating constipation are high. Non-invasive interventions are especially gaining importance.

Interventions

Bilateral oscillation therapy to the T10-L2 region for the regulation of sympathetic tone, suboccipital release technique for the regulation of parasympathetic tone, sacrum mobilization, celiac, mesenteric superior and inferior ganglion mobilizations, colon peristalsis and ileocecal valve mobilization for the treatment of functional dysfunctions, ascending colon mobilization, transverse colon. mobilization, descending colon fascia mobilization and sigmoid colon mobilization, peritoneal mobilization

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTconservative treatment

Nutritional recommendations and necessary nutritional supplements to facilitate digestion and defecation

Sponsors

Pamukkale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Sealed envelope method

Intervention model description

Parallel two group which are equal

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Volunteer individuals aged 18 and over * Clinical diagnosis with functional constipation based on ROMA IV criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of a gastrointestinal disease other than constipation, * Undergone abdominal surgery in the last 6 months, * Having abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute rectal bleeding, malignant mass in the GIS, * Pregnancy or suspected of pregnancy, * Cliniclal diagnosis of neurological disease that may cause constipation, * Expreinced unexplained fever, Individuals with night sweats and weight loss

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Constipation severity scale5 minutesIt is a scale that evaluates individuals' defecation frequency, intensity and difficulty during defecation. The scale includes 16 questions. It has 3 sub-dimensions: fecal obstruction, colon laziness and pain. The score range that can be obtained from the scale is 0-73. high scores indicate symptoms are severe.
Constipation Quality of Life Scale5 minutesThis scale is a self-rating scale consisting of 28 items and subscales of anxiety/anxiety (11 items), physical discomfort (4 items), psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and satisfaction (5 items). Item scores of the five-point Likert-type scale vary between 1 and 5. While patients answered the first and fifth parts of the scale as Not at all (1), Quite a bit (2), Somewhat (3), Quite a lot (4) and A lot (5), the second, third, In the fourth and sixth sections, he was asked to choose the most suitable one among the options Never (1), Rarely (2), Sometimes (3), Often (4), Always (5). . The highest score that can be obtained from the scale is 140 and the lowest score is 28. It is thought that as the scores from the scale increase, the quality of life is negatively affected. There should be no unanswered questions for coding to be done.
Bristol Stool Scale5 minutesBristol Stool Scale Bristol Stool Scale classifies human feces into 7 groups. The shape of the stool varies depending on the length of time it stays in the colon. Although not entirely scientific, this chart helps healthcare professionals better perceive stool patterns when making a diagnosis.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactErhan Kızmaz, PhD
erhankizmaz@hotmail.com+905418966676
Backup ContactAziz Dengiz, PhD
ptazizdengiz@gmail.com+905454216688

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026