Skip to content

External Fixator or Antibiotic-coated Plate in Severe Open Long Bone Fractures

Use of Antibiotics-cement Coated Plate in the Treatment of Gustilo-Anderson Type III Long Bone Fractures in Low- and Middle-income Countries vs External Fixation: A Multi-centre Randomized Control Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06193330
Enrollment
178
Registered
2024-01-05
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2024-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fracture Related Infection

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to assess whether infection rate is reduced with use of antibiotic-coated plate in severe open tibial fractures compare to use of external fixators

Interventions

PROCEDUREantibiotic-coated plate

A plate for fixing long bone fractures is coated with antibiotics cement prepared in theatre

external fixators are applied to participants with severe long bone fractures

Sponsors

Orthopaedic Trauma Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Oluwasegun Aremu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18yrs, * Gustilo-Anderson IIIA and IIIB open fractures, * involvement of any long bone fractures that can be fixed with either plate or uniplanar external fixation, * wound can be closed primarily, with skin graft or flap, or can heal secondarily

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with traumatic brain injury, * spinal cord injury, * severe burns, * 1 long bone fractures, * refusal to consent, * history of allergies to ceftriaxone or sulbactam, * fractures associated with vascular injury * and non-compliance with follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of participants with fracture-related infection after 1 yearone yearparticipants will be followed-up for one year and occurrence of infection at any point during this time period will be noted and recorded once

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of participants who have fracture union after one yearone yearparticipants will be assessed clinically and radiologically at 3months, 6months, and one year
number of participants who require re-operation after one yearone yearduring the course of follow-up, Patients with infection or other complications like malunion or non-union who require surgical intervention to achieve union will be noted and recorded
change in 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) score at baseline and at one year follow-upone yearSF-12 score of participants will be taking at baseline and also at one year of follow-up and these two scores will be assessed to determine any differences

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
sub-group analysis of infection rate between smokers and non-smokersone yearThe participants will be grouped into smokers and non-smokers and the infection rate between the two groups will be compared
sub-group analysis of infection rate between participants with and without co-morbiditiesone yearThe participants will be grouped into those with co-morbidities and those without and the infection rate between the two groups will be compared

Countries

Nigeria

Contacts

Primary ContactOluwasegun Aremu
segunaremu2k3@yahoo.com+2347069414622
Backup ContactOlugboyega Oyewole
dokitagboe@gmail.com+2348023657211

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026