Skip to content

Single-use Versus Reusable Gastroscopes in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

One-Scope II: Single-use Versus Reusable Gastroscopes in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06192355
Acronym
OneScopeII
Enrollment
150
Registered
2024-01-05
Start date
2023-03-27
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2024-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Keywords

Endoscopy, Emergency

Brief summary

Controlled-randomized trial evaluating single-use versus reusable gastroscopes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Detailed description

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency. According to guidelines, endoscopic evaluation should be performed within 24 hours. With an overall high incidence and an overall high number of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures, the introduction of new endoscopic concepts may have a profound impact on outcomes as well as cost-effectiveness in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. For this purpose, the use of single-use gastroscopes represents an interesting possibility. Hygiene issues in the emergency situation are also relevant. The previous feasibility study One-Scope I demonstrated that the diagnosis as well as the therapy of upper gastrointestinal bleeding is possible with single-use gastroscopes. In this follow-up study, the investigators compare the use of single-use versus reusable gastroscopes in participants with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a randomized controlled trial.

Interventions

DEVICEEndoscopic hemostasis using a Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

performing an Esophagogastroduodenoscopy for diagnosis and therapy of possible bleeding sites

Sponsors

University Hospital Augsburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) \>2 * Clinical signs of upper bleeding

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * Unable to provide consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intraprocedural technical successUp to 20 minutesdefined as reaching the descending duodenum and adequately assessing for the presence of a bleeding site

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
re-bleeding rateUp to 30 daysneed for further endoscopic, interventional-angiographic, or surgical intervention within 30 days due to upper GI-bleeding
blood transfusionsUp to 30 daysNeed for blood transfusion due to a hemorrhage-related decrease in hemoglobin levels ≤ 70 g/L
Length of StayUp to 30 daysDuration of inpatient stay, measured from the day of admission to the day of discharge
intraprocedural clinical successUp to 45 Minutesdefined as successful endoscopic hemostasis during the examination if required
cross over to reusable gastroscopeUp to 60 MinutesSwitch to a reusable gastroscope in case of non-achieved technical or clinical success, such as unsuccessful hemostasis, insufficient assessment of the bleeding source, or inability to reach the descending duodenum
Adverse eventsUp to 30 daysOccurrence of adverse events, such as perforation, bleeding exacerbation, aspiration, and infection.
Length of interventionUp to 60 minutesmeasured from initiation to achievement of hemostasis

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactChristoph Römmele, MD
christoph.roemmele@uk-augsburg.de+498214002351
Backup ContactAlanna Ebigbo, MD
alanna.ebigbo@uk-augsburg.de

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026