Skip to content

Co-Active Therapeutic Theatre (Co-ATT) for Dual-Diagnosis Patients

Pilot Study on the Use of the Co-Active Therapeutic Theatre (Co-ATT) Manualised Model of Drama Therapy for the Treatment of Patients With Co-occurring Primary Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders

Status
Suspended
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06187701
Acronym
Co-ATT
Enrollment
10
Registered
2024-01-03
Start date
2027-01-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental Health Issue, Substance Use Disorders

Keywords

Drama therapy, Psychiatric symptom severity, Subjective quality of life, Overall functioning

Brief summary

Drama Therapy involves of the use of theatrical techniques (such as script development, acting exercises, improvisation, etc.) to help treat patients' mental illness and improve their functioning and overall sense of wellbeing. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of a specific version of drama therapy for the treatment of patients suffering from both mental illness (such as depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, etc.) and one or more substance use disorders. The study will also assess participants feelings and thoughts about the drama therapy intervention (such as whether or not they enjoyed it and if/how they found it helpful). The drama therapy intervention will consist of one group drama therapy session per week, for a total of twelve weeks (i.e., total twelve sessions) followed by a single performance (with composition of the audience determined by unanimous agreement of the participants) of the dramatic work (script) produced by the participants during the course of the drama therapy intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCo-Active Therapeutic Theatre (Co-ATT)

There will be one group drama therapy session per week, for a total of twelve weeks (i.e., total twelve sessions) followed by a single performance (with composition of the audience determined by unanimous agreement of the participants) of the dramatic work (script) produced by the participants during the course of the drama therapy intervention.

Sponsors

Boston Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with at least one primary psychiatric disorder, and * Diagnosed with at least one substance use disorder * Both disorders active (i.e., meeting DSM-V criteria for each disorder (i.e., with ongoing psychiatric symptoms and ongoing substance use) * Enrolled in the Addiction Psychiatry Treatment Program (APTP) at Boston Medical Center (i.e., scheduled for follow-up appointments with therapist and/or psychiatrist in APTP). * Currently taking medications and those not currently taking medications

Exclusion criteria

* Incarcerated persons * Pregnant women * Inability to understand and/or sign informed consent form

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in substance usebaseline, 12 weeksAssessed with the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) Tool. TAPS consists of a combined screening component (TAPS-1) followed by a brief followed by a brief assessment (TAPS-2) for those who screen positive. Scores on these questions generate a risk level per substance endorsed, based on a range of possible scores per substance. TAPS Score Risk Category- 0=No Use in Past 3 Months, 1=Problem Use, 2+ =Higher Risk
Change in psychiatric symptom severity for a history of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)baseline, 12 weeksThe Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) will be used to assess this outcome. It is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that is used as a screening and diagnostic tool for mental health disorders of depression, anxiety, alcohol, eating, and somatoform disorders.There are 9 questions with a score from 0=Not al all to 3=Nearly everyday and one additional question about level of difficulty. Scores can range from 1 to 27 and are interpreted as: 1-4 Minimal depression, 5-9 Mild depression, 10-14 Moderate depression, 15-19 Moderately severe depression, and 20-27 Severe depression.
Change in psychiatric symptom severity given a history of bipolar disorder with the BDRSbaseline, 12 weeksThe Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS) has 20 questions with responses from 0= Nil to 3= Severe. The maximum score possible is 60. Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms.
Change in psychiatric symptom severity given a history of bipolar disorder with the YMRSbaseline, 12 weeksThe Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) has eleven items and is based on the patient's subjective report of his or her clinical condition, and generally limited to the previous 48 hours. Scores can range from 0 to 60 and higher scores are associated with more severe symptoms.
Change in psychiatric symptom severity for a history of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)baseline, 12 weeksThe Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) will be used to assess this outcome. The total severity score on the CAPS-5 represents the sum of the individual severity scores (0-4) for each of the 20 PTSD symptoms. Total scores range from 0-80, with higher scores indicating more severe PTSD symptoms.
Change in psychiatric symptom severity for a history of schizophrenia/schizophrenic disorders.baseline, 12 weeksThe Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) will be used to asses this outcome. PANSS items are rated on a 7-point scale (1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, and 7=extreme); because the absence of symptoms is equal to 1 point, the lowest possible total score on both PANSS scales is 7. The range for both the negative and positive scales are 7 to 49.
Change in subjective quality of lifebaseline, 12 weeksThe Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) will be used to assess this outcome. The QOLS is scored by adding up the score on each item to yield a total score for the instrument. Scores can range from 16 to 112. Higher score indicate higher quality of life.
Change in overall functioningbaseline, 12 weeksThe WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) will be used to assess overall functioning. The WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire comprises six domains with a five-point Likert-type scale (1 = no difficulty, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, and 5 = extreme) to measure the difficulty in performing activities. HIgher scores are associated with more disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustainable change in substance use3 months, 6 monthsAssessed with the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) Tool. TAPS consists of a combined screening component (TAPS-1) followed by a brief followed by a brief assessment (TAPS-2) for those who screen positive. Scores on these questions generate a risk level per substance endorsed, based on a range of possible scores per substance. TAPS Score Risk Category- 0=No Use in Past 3 Months, 1=Problem Use, 2+ =Higher Risk
Sustainable change in psychiatric symptom severity for a history of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)3 months, 6 monthsThe Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) will be used to assess this outcome. It is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that is used as a screening and diagnostic tool for mental health disorders of depression, anxiety, alcohol, eating, and somatoform disorders.There are 9 questions with a score from 0=Not al all to 3=Nearly everyday and one additional question about level of difficulty. Scores can range from 1 to 27 and are interpreted as: 1-4 Minimal depression, 5-9 Mild depression, 10-14 Moderate depression, 15-19 Moderately severe depression, and 20-27 Severe depression.
Sustainable change in psychiatric symptom severity given a history of bipolar disorder with the BDRS3 months, 6 monthsThe Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BPDS) has 20 questions with responses from 0= Nil to 3= Severe. The maximum score possible is 60. Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms.
Sustainable change in psychiatric symptom severity given a history of bipolar disorder with the YMRS3 months, 6 monthsThe Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) has eleven items and is based on the patient's subjective report of his or her clinical condition, and generally limited to the previous 48 hours. Scores can range from 0 to 60 and higher scores are associated with more severe symptoms.
Sustainable change in psychiatric symptom severity for a history of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)3 months, 6 monthsThe Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) will be used to assess this outcome. The total severity score on the CAPS-5 represents the sum of the individual severity scores (0-4) for each of the 20 PTSD symptoms. Total scores range from 0-80, with higher scores indicating more severe PTSD symptoms.
Sustainable change in psychiatric symptom severity for a history of schizophrenia/schizophrenic disorders.3 months, 6 monthsThe Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) will be used to asses this outcome. PANSS items are rated on a 7-point scale (1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, and 7=extreme); because the absence of symptoms is equal to 1 point, the lowest possible total score on both PANSS scales is 7. The range for both the negative and positive scales are 7 to 49.
Sustainable change in subjective quality of life3 months, 6 monthsThe Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) will be used to assess this outcome. The QOLS is scored by adding up the score on each item to yield a total score for the instrument. Scores can range from 16 to 112. Higher score indicate higher quality of life.
Sustainable change in overall functioning3 months, 6 monthsThe WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) will be used to assess overall functioning. The WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire comprises six domains with a five-point Likert-type scale (1 = no difficulty, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, and 5 = extreme) to measure the difficulty in performing activities. HIgher scores are associated with more disability.
Feasibility of the drama therapy intervention12 weeksThis outcome will be assessed by responses to an investigator developed structured interview with study staff at end of intervention.
Acceptability of the drama therapy intervention12 weeksThis outcome will be assessed by responses to an investigator developed structured interview with study staff at end of intervention.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORWilliam-Bernard Reid-Varley, MD MPH

Boston Medical Center, Psychiatry Department

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026