Skip to content

Redo Repair in Disrupted Hypospadias

Tubularized Incised Plate (TIP) Procedure Versus Other Procedures in the Repair of Disrupted Hypospadias

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06187363
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-01-02
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2022-01-01
Last updated
2024-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypospadias

Keywords

Hypospadias, Redo repair, Disruption

Brief summary

Redo hypospadias repair is a challenging situation and its success depends on many factors. Several procedures could be used in such situations with variable outcomes. The investigator in this study aimed at comparing the results of these procedures

Detailed description

Purpose: Our study compared the outcome of the tubularized incised plate urethroplasty procedure and other procedures in the case of redo hypospadias repair. Methods: The participants were categorized into those who were treated by the tubularized incised plate procedure (Group A) and those who were treated by other procedures (Group B) and the collected data were compared between the two groups. The patients were examined regularly during the postoperative period for urethral-cutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, penile curvature, penile skin coverage, and re-disruption.

Interventions

PROCEDURETubularized incised plate procedure

Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty procedure

PROCEDUREOther procedures

Other procedures than tubularized incised plate urethroplasty procedure

Sponsors

Egyptian Biomedical Research Network
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pediatric patients with disrupted hypospadias repair

Exclusion criteria

* Fresh cases of hypospadias

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of participants who developed post-operative meatal strictureat 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at the end of the 1st yearassessment of the position of neo-meatus in glans together with its diameter as well as the presence of stenosis as judged by urethral calibration
The rate of development of recurrent post-operative chordaeat 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at the end of the 1st yearThe recurrence of ventral penile chordae as discovered by recurrent ventral penile curvature
The incidence of development of postoperative penile skin scarringat 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at the end of the 1st yearAssessment of penile skin coverage as judged by the development of recurrent curvature, torsion and/or disfigurement
The incidence of the development of failed repair as discovered by the position of the neo-meatusat 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at the end of the 1st yearRe-disruption the reposition of the neo-meatus to the previous site
The incidence of the development of post-operative urethral-cutaneous fistulaat 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at the end of the 1st yearThe development of post-operative urethral-cutaneous fistula as judged by the development of a second urethral openning proximal to the neo-meatus

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026