Hemiplegia, Stroke
Conditions
Brief summary
Objective: The investigators compared the effectiveness of individual and combined application of conventional rehabilitation and robotic hand rehabilitation in post-stroke hemiplegia. The study design is an An assessor-blinded, prospective randomized comparison study. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1 (Robotic Hand Rehabilitation): The patients underwent robotic hand rehabilitation, Group 2 (Conventional Rehabilitation): The patients underwent conventional rehabilitation, Group 3 (Combined Rehabilitation): The patients underwent combined conventional and robotic hand rehabilitation at the same period. Randomization was performed using the closed envelope method randomization sequence by an investigator who was not involved in patient care. The therapist opened the envelope 6 hours before the patient started treatment. The investigators assessed Barthel index for activities of daily living (range, 0 - 100), Brunnstrom's hemiplegia recovery staging (range, stage 1 - stage 7), Fugl-Meyer upper extremity assessment scale (stage, 0 - 66), Abilhand stroke hand ability questionnaire assessment (range, 0 - 46), hand grip strength, and hand pinch strength at baseline and end of the rehabilitation (1-month). Conclusions: There are many studies in the literature on the hand and upper extremity functions of Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation in stroke. They revealed that both therapies had a positive effect on the results. There is no study on the effect of combined application of Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation on hand and upper extremity functions. More successful hand functional results may be achieved by applying both rehabilitations together in stroke. The aim of our study is to compare the effects of early-term individually and concomitant Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation on hand and upper extremity functions and hand strength in stroke. Our hypothesis is that the combined application of Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation together will provide better functional results of the hand and upper extremity.
Detailed description
Objective: Hemiplegia or hemiparesis is commonly seen after stroke.Upper limb function, particularly hand function, plays a crucial role in determining the quality of life and independence after stroke. Numerous studies have been conducted on rehabilitation to improve upper extremity function.There are many studies in the literature on the hand and upper extremity functions of Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation in stroke. They revealed that both therapies had a positive effect on the results. There is no study on the effect of combined application of Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation on hand and upper extremity functions. More successful hand functional results may be achieved by applying both rehabilitations together in stroke. The aim of our study is to compare the effects of early-term individually and concomitant Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation on hand and upper extremity functions and hand strength in stroke. Our hypothesis is that the combined application of Conventional Rehabilitation and Robotic Hand Rehabilitation together will provide better functional results of the hand and upper extremity. Methods: 66 patients with post-stroke hemiplegia will include in our study. Grip strength was measured with a dynamometer (JamarR, PrestonTM, Jackson, MI) and pinch strength was measured with a specially designed instrument (Pinch gauge, B&R EngineeringTM, Santa Fe Springs, CA). Measurements were made 3 times and the average value was taken. The patients were evaluated before rehabilitation and at the first month follow-up. The same therapist who was blind to the type of rehabilitation evaluated the patients before treatment and at the first month follow-up. Conclusions: Combined Rehabilitation achieves results just as successful as Conventional Rehabilitation in terms of daily living activities, upper extremity functions, and hand functions. Additionally, it significantly outperformed Conventional Rehabilitation in improving hand functions, treating hand spasticity, and enhancing hand strength.
Interventions
OTHERRobotic hand rehabilitation
Robotic hand rehabilitation devices are the most advanced, effective and user-friendly combination of technology to support motor rehabilitation of the upper limb and neurocognitive recovery. Serving patients, doctors, therapists through therapies and protocols that accompany all stages of the rehabilitation process, the devices promote the functional recovery of patients and their reintegration into daily life.
Sponsors
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The patients were evaluated before rehabilitation and at the first month follow-up. The same therapist who was blind to the type of rehabilitation evaluated the patients before treatment and at the first month follow-up.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosed with cortical or subcortical stroke confirmed by radiological imaging * Over 18 years old age * Mini-Mental Scale (MMS) = 24-30 * Not having serious cognitive impairment (score ≥22) * The rehabilitation of the patient was performed at the rehabilitation department of XXXXX Research and Training Hospital.
Exclusion criteria
* Having a stroke lesion in other areas of the brain such as the cerebellum and brainstem * Presence of joint or bone pathologies in the affected upper extremity * Excessive spasticity in the elbow or wrist joints of the affected upper extremity (Modified Ashworth Scale score \>3) * Having previously surgical treatment history on the affected extremity * Having an additional neurological disease * Not complying with treatment recommendations or inadequately applying.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Barthel index for activities of daily living | The patients were evaluated before rehabilitation and at the first month follow-up. | Barthel index was used to evaluate the daily living activities of the patients. Total score is between 0 - 100. 0 - 20 completely dependent, 21 - 61 highly dependent, 62 - 90 moderately dependent, 91 - 99 slightly dependent, 100 completely independent. |
| Brunnstrom's hemiplegia recovery staging | The patients were evaluated before rehabilitation and at the first month follow-up. | It was used to evaluate hemiplegia recovery upper extremity. It has 7 stages. Stage 1: There is no movement in the held arm. It is flask. Stage 7: Normal motor function is regained. |
| Fugl-Meyer upper extremity assessment scale | The patients were evaluated before rehabilitation and at the first month follow-up. | It was used to evaluate upper extremity function. Total score is between 0 - 66. |
| ABILHAND stroke hand ability questionnaire assessment | The patients were evaluated before rehabilitation and at the first month follow-up. | It was used to evaluate stroke hand function. Total score is between 0 - 46. |
| grip strength, and pinch strength | The patients were evaluated before rehabilitation and at the first month follow-up. | It was used to evaluate hand strength. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed