Cataract
Conditions
Brief summary
In order to better cope with complex situations of cataract surgery, we designed and improved a new set of multi-functional cataract surgery auxiliary devices, including ophthalmic surgery auxiliary hooks, eye retractor hooks and membranous cataract scissors. Their common feature is that they have the function of 2-3 traditional surgical instruments, which can be switched in operations, reducing the replacement of different surgical instruments, lowing the number of surgical instruments in and out of the incision, reducing trauma and improving surgical efficiency. The purpose of this multi-center prospective clinical study is to verify the advantages of this new group of multifunctional devices and further summarize the experience and improvement by comparing the safety and effectiveness of traditional cataract surgical instruments combined with new multifunctional cataract assisted surgical instruments and traditional cataract surgical instruments alone.
Detailed description
Cataract is the number one cause of blindness, and the main treatment method is surgery to remove the cloudy lens and install an intraocular lens. The operation relies on ophthalmic micromanipulative instruments, but in complex cases such as abnormal lens capsule, ocular trauma, etc., the difficulty of surgery increases, so that conventional instruments are often unable to complete the operation well. In order to better cope with these complex situations, we designed and improved a new set of multi-functional cataract surgery auxiliary devices, including ophthalmic surgery auxiliary hooks, eye retractor hooks and membranous cataract scissors, which have obtained utility model patents and first-class medical device filings. Their common feature is that they have the function of 2-3 traditional surgical instruments, which can be switched intraoperatively, reduce the replacement of different surgical instruments, reduce the number of surgical instruments in and out of the incision, reduce trauma and improve surgical efficiency. The purpose of this multi-center prospective clinical study is to verify the advantages of this new group of multifunctional devices and further summarize the experience and improvement by comparing the safety and effectiveness of traditional cataract surgical instruments combined with new multifunctional cataract assisted surgical instruments and traditional cataract surgical instruments alone.
Interventions
DEVICEmultifunctional instruments
Ophthalmic retractors can be used to lift the lens during surgery to assist in lens sucking or resection; Intraoperative injection of reagent, which has the advantage of retractable, micro-incision. Ophthalmic hooks can be used to secure support capsular bags; auxiliary cleavage; polishing capsule; Viscoelastic agent is injected as needed. The front end of the membranous cataract scissor is a capsular tearing forceps, and the capsule tearing and capsule scissors can be flexibly switched. All three instruments have the functions of two or three traditional instruments, which can be designed to reduce the number of times the instruments enter and exit the incision during surgery, improve surgical efficiency,
DEVICEtraditional instruments
traditional Cataract-assisted instruments for cataract operation.Puncture knives, microscissors, microscopic forceps, nucleus hooks, lens graft forceps, are used to cut the cornea, assist in removing the cloudy lens, suturing wounds.
Sponsors
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
\- Clinical diagnosis of cataract Patients need to undergo cataract surgery
Exclusion criteria
\- Active intraocular inflammation The intraocular pressure (IOP) was higher than 25 mmHg The endothelial cell count (ECC) was less than 1,200 cells/mm2 Combined with other eye diseases Combined with other serious systemic diseases
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Successful implantation rate of intraocular lens | through study completion, an average of 1 year | implantation rate of intraocular lens with different instrument |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual function | 1day postoperation，1 week，1 month， 3month postoperation | Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using a decimal chart Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using a decimal chart |
| intraocular pressure | 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 month postoperation | intraocular pressure |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary Contactxu wen, PHD
Outcome results
None listed