Skip to content

One-year Patency Comparison Between Radial Artery and No-touch Saphenous Vein Grafts in Women Undergoing Isolated CABG

No-Touch Saphenous Venous Harvesting TechniQue versUs Radial artEry in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in womEN: The QUEEN Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06179329
Acronym
QUEEN
Enrollment
150
Registered
2023-12-21
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2027-12-30
Last updated
2025-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Disease, Graft Failure, Surgery-Complications

Keywords

Cardiovascular Surgery, Coronary Disease, Women, Graft patency

Brief summary

The use of a graft from the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery has become the gold standard for the indication of coronary artery bypass grafting. However, choosing a graft for the second-best coronary artery, focusing on long-term patency, is still a challenge. The saphenous vein using the no-touch technique is an alternative to a radial artery graft, but there is little evidence, especially in women. This randomized clinical study aims to compare the patency of these grafts in the second-best coronary artery in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Interventions

PROCEDURECoronary artery bypass graft

Randomization will be performed for stratification according to the target coronary arteries and the randomly determined block size from 4 to 6. The randomization result will be delivered in a sealed envelope in the operating room (before the time out) for one of the two drawn strategies.

Sponsors

Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Unimed João Pessoa
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital do Coração Alagoano Prof. Adib Jatene
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Hernan Henriquez Aravena
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Norte Paranaense
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Women aged 18 years or older and younger than 75 years, undergoing isolated and primary myocardial revascularization surgery, with triarterial coronary artery disease (three vessels involved) in vessels subject to surgical revascularization and left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%. The target coronary vessels of the study will be those in the territory of the left circumflex artery and the right coronary artery, which must have at least 1.5 mm in diameter, and with proximal obstructive lesions of at least 70%.

Exclusion criteria

1. Preoperative conditions: 1. Lack of the patient's written informed consent. 2. Presence of poorly controlled diabetes, with a glycated hemoglobin value \>8 mg/dl. 3. Emergency or salvage surgery, where the intervention needs to be performed quickly due to the critical clinical condition of the patient. 4. Renal failure with glomerular filtration rate (creatinine clearance) \<30 mL/min. 2. Inability to use the saphenous and/or radial vein 1. Positive Allen test using a pulse oximeter 2. Presence of abnormal flow detected by means of a Doppler exam in one of the grafts to be used. 3. History of vasculitis or Raynaud's syndrome, varicose veins, or history of previous saphenous vein removal 3. Conditions that may affect patient follow-up 1. Presence of advanced peripheral arterial disease 2. Known contrast allergy: Presence of a documented allergy to the contrast agent used in radiological procedures. 3. Impossibility of tracking due to geographic inaccessibility. 4. Patients with lack of adherence to guidelines and/or prescribed medications.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
One Follow-up with angiographyOne year after surgeryThe primary endpoint will be the proportion of saphenous vein and radial artery grafts that were completely occluded on follow-up angiography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate in-hospital clinical outcomes 30 days after CABGThirty days after surgeryDeath from any cause, perioperative myocardial infarction (occurring between 0 and 30 days), late myocardial infarction (occurring between 31 days and 1 year), reoperation of surgical revascularization and/or coronary angioplasty. Hand claudication and thenar paresthesia, complications potentially related to radial artery extraction, will be reported according to the specific diagnoses and confirmed with a consulting neurologist. As all patients will receive a radial artery graft, clinical events will be reported for the entire study population.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactOmar A V Mejia, MD, PhD
omarvmejia@incor.usp.br+551126615014
Backup ContactLeonardo L Lacava, MD
lacavalopes@hotmail.com+55 49 33224453

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026