Skip to content

Pre-hospital ECMO or Conventional Resuscitation for Refractory Cardiac Arrest

PACER:Pre-hospital ECMO or Conventional Resuscitation for Refractory Cardiac Arrest. An Investigator Initiated, Parallel Group, Assessor-blinded, Registry Embedded, Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06177730
Acronym
PACER
Enrollment
10
Registered
2023-12-20
Start date
2024-03-31
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2023-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

ECMO, OHCA, pre-hospital, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest, ECPR, Extracorproreal Membrane Oxygenation

Brief summary

This pilot study aims to determine feasibility of randomising patients to receive pre-hospital Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) compared to conventional cardiac arrest care for refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The success of this study will be measured by the number of patients recruited into the study successfully treated with the treatment they were randomised to receive in the pre-Hospital setting.

Detailed description

Conventional cardiac arrest care, including high performance cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation and administration of drugs such as adrenaline is the current treatment for out of hospital cardiac arrest. In cases where this treatment does not see spontaneous circulation restored promptly, the patients cardiac arrest is termed refractory. Refractory Cardiac arrest is coupled with an increased risk of hypoxic injury to vital organs and the prospect of survival with good neurological recovery decreases dramatically. ECPR is an effective way to restore circulation for patients with refractory OHCA. Hospital based ECPR is the most common process by which refractory OHCA patients are treated with ECPR. Patients are transported to an ECPR capable hospital while receiving mechanical CPR. Transporting patients while receiving mechanical CPR is challenging and may lead to less effective CPR (low flow). It may also delay access to urgent hospital based treatments due to the extra time required to load a patient receiving mechanical CPR. Pre-Hospital ECPR is where the ECMO team rapidly attends the scene and implements ECMO while CPR is on-going at the scene. Benefits of this approach may include reduced low-flow time due to both earlier ECMO initiation as well as allowing the emergency responders focus on delivering high performance CPR rather than loading the patient for transport. The results of this study will inform a larger study where researchers will compare these two treatments to determine if ECPR leads to higher survival rates and better recovery for patients with refractory OHCA. Observational data for pre-hospital ECPR in the Australian setting looks promising. However ECPR systems are expensive and resource intensive, making answering this question an imperative.

Interventions

OTHERPre-Hospital ECPR

Implementation of pre-Hospital ECPr in OHCA

Sponsors

Ambulance Victoria
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients 18-70 years old * Witnessed cardiac arrest * Bystander CPR * Refractory cardiac arrest (\>20 mins, but \<45 mins) * Initial cardiac rhythm VF, VT or PEA * Within hours of PACER service operation (e.g. mon-fri 0800-1700) * Within 25 mins of rapid response ambulance (code 1 lights and sirens)

Exclusion criteria

* Initial cardiac rhythm asystole * ROSC with sustained recovery * Technically not possible to perform percutaneous cannulation * Evidence of/suspectedSignificant end stage disease: * Severe disability impairing activities of daily living * End-stage organ - cardiac, liver, lung, renal * Other life-limiting diseases e.g malignancy, terminal illness * Advance health care directive (not for resuscitation)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients in each group that are successfully initiated on ECMO.6 monthsProportion of patients in each group that are successfully initiated on ECMO. This will determine if it is feasible to randomise patients to receive either treatment

Contacts

Primary ContactPhoebe McCracken
phoebe.mccracken@monash.edu+61 458 154 740
Backup ContactTony Trapani
tony.trapani@monash.edu0409798892

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026