Skip to content

Laser Treatment of Reticular Leg Veins Vs. Sclerotherapy

Treatment of Reticular Leg Veins: a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Trial of a 1064 Nm Nd:YAG Long Pulse Laser, Combined Treatment of a 1064 Nm Nd:YAG Long Pulse Laser and Sclerotherapy Vs. Sclerotherapy Alone.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06175754
Enrollment
174
Registered
2023-12-19
Start date
2023-10-09
Completion date
2025-12-09
Last updated
2025-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Reticular Leg Veins

Keywords

reticular veins, long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser, sclerotherapy

Brief summary

Treatment of reticular veins with a 1064 nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser and combination of a 1064 nm Nd:YAG long pulse laser and sclerotherapy should be no less effective than sclerotherapy alone, and have a frequency of adverse events less then sclerotherapy alone.

Detailed description

Reticular leg veins are mostly an aesthetic problem. Sclerotherapy is considered the gold standard for treatment them. However, this method has a high frequency of long persistent hyperpigmentation which decreases the patients' satisfaction. It is a reason to find another method of treatment. Another possible technique to treat reticular veins is the Nd:YAG long pulse 1064 nm transdermal laser or Nd:YAG laser combined with injection sclerotherapy. There are a few studies comparing sclerotherapy with laser treatment and combined treatment with sclerotherapy. But there are no prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trials of all three methods: the 1064 nm Nd:YAG long pulse laser, combined treatment of a 1064 nm Nd:YAG long pulse laser with sclerotherapy and sclerotherapy alone. The aim of current study is the efficacy assessment of the 1064 nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser, combined treatment of the 1064 nm Nd:YAG long pulse laser with sclerotherapy and sclerotherapy alone for the treatment of reticular leg veins and analysis of side effects to establish advantages and disadvantage of these methods and find the best option for treatment of reticular leg veins.

Interventions

Examination, photographing, inclusion in the study, signing of informed consent, randomization, diameter measurement, laser

PROCEDURELaser with Sclerotherapy

Examination, photographing, inclusion in the study, signing of informed consent, randomization, diameter measurement, laser plus sclerotherapy

PROCEDURESclerotherapy

Examination, photographing, inclusion in the study, signing of informed consent, randomization, diameter measurement, sclerotherapy

Sponsors

Derzhavin Tambov State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women over 18 * reticular veins * signed informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* diabetes mellitus * pregnancy or lactation * malignant neoplasms * inability or unwillingness of the patient to wear compression stockings * hypersensitivity to the polidocanol, cold, sunlight * concomitant diseases: bronchial asthma, severe liver and kidney disease, acute thrombosis and thrombophlebitis, infection of the skin and/or soft tissues, infectious diseases, arteriosclerosis, diabetic angiopathy, heart defects requiring surgery, fever, toxic hyperthyroidism, obesity, tuberculosis, sepsis, violation of the cellular composition of the blood, all diseases requiring bed rest, heart disease with decompensation phenomena, * known hereditary thrombophilia. * period after treatment of alcoholism * reception of oral contraceptives * sedentary lifestyle

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disappearance of the reticular vein6 monthsThe clearing of the vessels on the six-point scale (from 0 to 5 points): 5 - total disappearance of the matting (100% efficacy), 4 - disappearance of around 80%, 3 - disappearance of around 60%, 2 - disappearance of around 40%, 1 - disappearance of around 20%, 0 - no changes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction After Treatment6 monthsAssessment of patient satisfaction on the 3-point scale : no result (0 points), incomplete satisfaction (1 point), complete satisfaction (2 points)
Intensity of hyperpigmentation6 monthsAssessment of Intensity of hyperpigmentation on Skin Hyperpigmentation Index (SHI)
Pain during the procedure: Numerical Rating Scaleimmediately after the procedureEstimate of the pain on Numerical Rating Scale. Numerical Rating Scale \[NRS\] is a measure of pain intensity from 0 to 10 points.

Countries

Russia

Contacts

Primary ContactOksana V Bukina, PhD
ovsafonova@yandex.ru+79051204983
Backup ContactGusen I Kurbanov
alpha297@mail.ru+79622348861

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026