Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Adverse Events and Effectiveness of BOTOX Injections for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Forehead Lines in Chinese Adult Participants

A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BOTOX® (Botulinum Toxin Type A) Purified Neurotoxin Complex for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Forehead Lines in China

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06174688
Enrollment
140
Registered
2023-12-18
Start date
2023-12-12
Completion date
2024-09-13
Last updated
2025-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Forehead Lines

Keywords

Forehead Lines, BOTOX, Botulinum Toxin Type A

Brief summary

Facial lines (such as glabellar lines \[GL\], lateral canthal lines \[LCL\], and forehead lines \[FHL\]) are perhaps the most visible signs of aging. Hyperfunctional facial lines that develop from repeated facial expression may be treated by selectively weakening specific muscles with small quantities of botulinum toxin. The purpose of this study is to assess adverse events and effectiveness of BOTOX in Chinese adults with moderate to severe FHL. Participants are placed in 1 of 2 groups, called treatment arms. Around 140 adult participants with moderate to severe FHL will be enrolled in the study. Participants in the treatment group will receive intramuscular injections on Day 1 and followed for up to 180 Days. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at the study site. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

Interventions

DRUGBOTOX

Intramuscular Injections

DRUGPlacebo

Intramuscular Injections

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Sufficient visual acuity without the use of eyeglasses (contact lens use acceptable) to accurately assess their facial wrinkles. * Participant must have symmetrical FHL of moderate or severe rating at maximum contraction as assessed by both investigator and participant using the Facial Wrinkle Scale with Asian Photonumeric Guide (FWS-A) at Day 1 prior to study treatment. * Participant must have glabellar lines (GL) severity of moderate or severe rating at maximum contraction as assessed by investigator using the FWS-A at Day 1 prior to study treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with history of known immunization or hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin serotype. * Participants with history of an allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to constituents of the study drug (and its excipients) and/or other products in the same class. * Presence of tattoos, jewelry, or clothing which obscures or interferes with the target area of interest and cannot be removed. * Participant with history of treatments to the mid- or upper face.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants who Achieved 'None' or 'Mild' on Facial Wrinkle Scale with Asian Photonumeric Guide (FWS-A) According to the Investigator Assessment of Forehead Lines (FHL) SeverityDay 30The investigator assesses FHL severity using the FWS-A 4-point scale ranging from 0=None to 3=Severe.
Percentage of Participants who Achieved 'None' or 'Mild' on FWS-A According to the Participant Assessment of FHL SeverityDay 30The participant assesses FHL severity using the FWS-A 4-point scale ranging from 0=None to 3=Severe.
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs)Day 180An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants who Achieved at Least a 20-Point Psychosocial Impact Improvement from Baseline on the FLSQ Impact DomainBaseline to Day 30The FLSQ consists of 13 questions that assess treatment satisfaction and psychosocial impact. Participants assessed their satisfaction with FHL using the FLSQ 5-point scale ranging from -2=Very dissatisfied to 2=Very satisfied.
Percentage of Participants who Achieved at least 1-Grade Improvement from Baseline on FWS-A According to the Investigator Assessment of FHL SeverityBaseline to Day 30The investigator assesses FHL severity using the FWS-A 4-point scale ranging from 0=None to 3=Severe.
Percentage of Participants who Achieved at least 2-Grade Improvement from Baseline on FWS-A According to the Participant Assessment of FHL SeverityBaseline to Day 30The participant assesses FHL severity using the FWS-A 4-point scale ranging from 0=None to 3=Severe.
Percentage of Participants who Achieved at least 2-Grade Improvement from Baseline on FWS-A According to the Investigator Assessment of FHL SeverityBaseline to Day 30The investigator assesses FHL severity using the FWS-A 4-point scale ranging from 0=None to 3=Severe.
Percentage of Participants with Responder Status of 'Very Satisfied' or 'Mostly Satisfied' on Satisfaction with Treatment on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) follow up Item 5Day 60The FLSQ consists of 13 questions that assess treatment satisfaction and psychosocial impact. Participants assessed their satisfaction with FHL using the FLSQ 5-point scale ranging from -2=Very dissatisfied to 2=Very satisfied.
Percentage of Participants with Responder Status of 'Very Satisfied' or 'Mostly Satisfied' on Satisfaction with Natural Look on the FLSQ follow up Item 4Day 30The FLSQ consists of 13 questions that assess treatment satisfaction and psychosocial impact. Participants assessed their satisfaction with FHL using the FLSQ 5-point scale ranging from -2=Very dissatisfied to 2=Very satisfied.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026