Skip to content

BroadBand Light for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Broadband Light for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06174064
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-12-18
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2025-08-30
Last updated
2023-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Keywords

Dry eye, Blepharitis, Meibomian gland dysfunction, intense pulsed light

Brief summary

The investigators will be evaluating the use of broadband light in Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Detailed description

Broadband light (BBL) is a widely used treatment for improvement of inflammatory dermatologic conditions such as acne and rosacea, and may have similar therapeutic benefits on the treatment of dry eye disease by targeting inflammation of the eyelids. The investigators propose a prospective study to determine the safety and efficacy of BBL treatment on patients with dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction. Each participant will have three treatments of BBL at monthly intervals to the cheek and periorbital area with subsequent follow up. Measured endpoints will include signs and symptoms of dry eye control including full ophthalmic exam, dry eye diagnostic testing, photographs, and standardized questionnaires.

Interventions

DEVICEBroadband Light treatment

While shielding the eyes, multiple passes of broadband light will be applied to the upper cheeks and eyelids after applying topical lidocaine.

DEVICESham broadband light treatment

The light will be occluded on the usual BBL device so that no treatment is delivered but the preparation and procedure will otherwise be the same.

Sponsors

Ophthalmic Surgeons & Consultants of Ohio, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Southern California
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Patients will be randomized to protocol 1, 2, or sham but will not be aware of their assignment; investigators grading dry eye at baseline and after treatment will not be aware of which protocol the patients underwent.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized to three arms: protocol 1, 2, and sham

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Fitzpatrick Skin Type I-V * Must be diagnosed with Dry eye disease (DED) and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) * Persistent dry eye signs and or symptoms after at least one prior DED treatment modality

Exclusion criteria

* Prior Intense pulsed light treatment for DED within the past six months * Prior Meibomian gland treatment with a device for DED within the past three months * History of trauma-induced ocular surface disease (thermal burns, chemical burns) * Subject is pregnant * History of seizures * Having significant unprotected sun exposure within the treatment area * Use of Accutane within the last six months * Use of doxycycline in the last 1 month * Allergy to proparacaine or lidocaine * Having active herpes simplex virus infection within the treatment area * Laser eye surgery (LASIK) within the past twelve months * History of abnormal response to sunlight * Having an active medical condition that may affect normal healing * Having active infections or compromised immune system * History of basal cell carcinoma in the treatment area within the past twelve months * History of keloid scar formation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in dry eye score1 month after last BBL treatment (4 month time-point)Change in SPEED dry eye disease questionnaire score from baseline to 1 month post-treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical evaluation of dry eye-- Change in fluorescein staining grade1 month after last BBL treatmentChange in Fluorescein staining graded with Oxford scale score from baseline to 1 month post-treatment
Clinical evaluation of dry eye--Change in tear osmolarity1 month after last BBL treatmentChange in tear osmolarity (in milliosm/L) from baseline to 1 month post-treatment
Ocular surface/eyelid microbiome data1 month after last BBL treatmentgenomic analysis of ocular surface flora at baseline compared to 1 month post-treatment
Clinical evaluation of dry eye--Change in tear breakup time1 month after last BBL treatmentChange in tear break up time (in seconds) from baseline to 1 month post-treatment
Clinical evaluation of dry eye--Change in basal tear production1 month after last BBL treatmentChange in basal tear production (in millimeters using standardized filter paper) from baseline to 1 month post-treatment
Clinical evaluation of dry eye--Change in Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) presence in significant concentration1 month after last BBL treatmentChange in MMP-9 testing (test is positive for MMP-9 level above 40ng/mL, and negative if below that threshold) from baseline to 1 month post-treatment

Contacts

Primary ContactSandy Zhang-Nunes, MD
sandy.zhang-nunes@med.usc.edu323-442-6335
Backup ContactJessica R Chang, MD
jessica.chang@med.usc.edu323-442-6785

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026