Skip to content

A CCTA Image Assisted Triage Software for the Assessment of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

A CCTA Image Assisted Triage Software for the Assessment of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: a Retrospective, Multi-center, Blind-evaluation Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06172985
Enrollment
1093
Registered
2023-12-15
Start date
2023-05-09
Completion date
2024-02-29
Last updated
2023-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Heart Disease

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trail is to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of the CCTA image assisted triage software(DeepVessel® Cardisight, Keya Medical.) for the triage of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Detailed description

The CCTA images collected by each center within a certain period of time would be screened, desensitized, and then evaluated by the software and independent expert group respectively, to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of the coronary CT angiography image stenosis assisted triage software developed by Koyal Medical Technology Co. Experiment group: Evaluated by the software Independent expert group: Evaluated by experts (≥5 years of CCTA experience required)

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

Due to observational study

Sponsors

Keya Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. CCTA images acquired by CT detectors need to meet the following requirements: * Check Modal = CT * Number of detector rows ≥ 64 rows * Layer thickness ≤1mm * Layer spacing ≤1mm * Pixel pitch ≤ 0.5mm * Ball tube voltage ≥ 70kV * Number of layers ≥ 100 layers 2. CCTA image quality score ≥ 3 (5-point Likert scale).

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe coronary artery calcification, which in the judgment of readers affects the stenosis adjudicator; 2. Previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); 3. Congenital anomalies of coronary artery origin or other malformations; 4. Coronary artery occlusive lesions; 5. Implantation of the pacemaker, internal defibrillator electrode, or prosthetic heart valve.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity and specificity of experiment group in triage for patients with suspected coronary artery diseaseOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Based on the results of the independent expert group, uses stenosis degree≥50% as the boundary for triage indication on a per-patient basis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gender stratified statistics, respectively, with patients and blood vessels as research unitsOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Evaluation criteria were established based on the results of the independent expert group to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the trial group to the triage hints of suspected patients with coronary heart disease
Manufacturer stratified statistics, respectively, with patients and blood vessels as research unitsOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Evaluation criteria were established based on the results of the independent expert group to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the trial group to the triage hints of suspected patients with coronary heart disease
Diagnostic timeOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Independent expert group: recording the sum of image post-processing time (T1) and the time to produce the results (T2); Experimental group: recording the time from image post-processing to outputting results; Calculate the difference between the two groups.
Patient as research unitOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Evaluation criteria were established based on the results of the independent expert group to evaluate the total conformity rate, KAPPA value, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of triage tips for patients with suspected coronary heart disease in the experimental group.
Blood vessels were used as the research unitOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Evaluation criteria were established based on the results of the independent expert group to evaluate the total conformity rate, KAPPA value, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of triage tips for patients with suspected coronary heart disease in the experimental group.
The vascular segment was used as the research unitOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Evaluation criteria were established based on the results of the independent expert group to evaluate the total conformity rate, KAPPA value, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of triage tips for patients with suspected coronary heart disease in the experimental group.
The stratified statistics of tube voltage were conducted with patients and blood vessels as research unitsOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Evaluation criteria were established based on the results of the independent expert group to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the trial group to the triage hints of suspected patients with coronary heart disease
Layer thickness stratified statistics, patients and blood vessels were used as research unitsOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Evaluation criteria were established based on the results of the independent expert group to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the trial group to the triage hints of suspected patients with coronary heart disease
The patients and blood vessels were selected as the research unitsOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Evaluation criteria were established based on the results of the independent expert group to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the trial group to the triage hints of suspected patients with coronary heart disease
Post-processing image quality evaluationOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Calculate the percentage of post-processing images with the image quality score of 2 or above in the total post-processing images, and the difference between the independent expert group and experimental group.
Software performance evaluationOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023From the function of use, ease of operation, stability to evaluate, divided into satisfactory, general, unsatisfactory three levels.
Row number stratified statistics, respectively, with patients and blood vessels as research unitsOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023Evaluation criteria were established based on the results of the independent expert group to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the trial group to the triage hints of suspected patients with coronary heart disease

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device DefectsOctober 13,2022 to March 1,2023In the course of clinical trials, there are unreasonable risks that may endanger human health and life safety under normal use of medical devices, such as label errors, quality problems, and frequent failures

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026