Diagnositic Efficacy, Spinal Infection
Conditions
Brief summary
Comparing the diagnostic efficacy between traditional laboratory methods and second-generation high-throughput sequencing in patients suspected of spinal infections.
Interventions
No intervention
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients suspected of spinal infections, as per the American Infectious Diseases Society's 2015 criteria for primary vertebral osteomyelitis, were identified based on their clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, and imaging examinations. All cases included in the study underwent laboratory examinations, histopathological examinations, and second-generation high-throughput sequencing (metagenomic sequencing).
Exclusion criteria
The absence of laboratory examinations, histopathological examinations, and results from second-generation high-throughput sequencing (metagenomic sequencing).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The diagnositic efficacy | 1 year | Sensitivity, Specificity |
Countries
China