Tobacco Dependence, Tobacco Smoking
Conditions
Brief summary
Comprehensive smoke-free policies have the potential to substantially reduce tobacco-related disparities among populations in subsidized housing. This study fills this gap by identifying approaches to increase the implementation of smoke-free policies in all types of subsidized housing by increasing the voluntary adoption of smoke-free homes and promoting access to smoking cessation services.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: The investigators will build on previous studies, where a smoke-free home intervention to increase voluntary adoption of smoke-free homes in permanent supportive housing for formerly homeless adults was developed and evaluated. Aim 1: To estimate the effect of our adapted smoke-free home intervention on the primary outcome of residents' voluntary adoption of smoke-free homes and the secondary outcome of biochemically-verified tobacco abstinence at 6-months follow-up. Aim 2: To determine the cost of our adapted smoke-free home intervention and determine whether it is a cost-effective use of health care resources. Aim 3: To evaluate variation in stakeholders' perspectives on the adapted smoke-free home intervention's adaptability, scalability and sustainability.The proposed intervention can expand access to smoke-free policies and smoking cessation services in subsidized housing, thereby reducing racial/ethnic disparities in tobacco use, tobacco exposure and chronic disease in these populations. OUTLINE: A wait-list cluster randomized controlled trial of the adapted smoke-free home intervention compared to usual care among residents from subsidized housing sites in Northern California. Participants from twenty-four subsidized housing sites will be randomized into intervention and waitlist control arms
Interventions
Study staff delivered intervention on how to adopt a smoke free home using a pamphlet
Brief tobacco cessation coaching by lay health worker housing staff with residents within 2 weeks of the smoke-free home resident intervention, and on a monthly schedule as part of their routine encounters with residents (total 6 sessions).
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Cluster randomized controlled groups
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Eligible resident participants * Current smokers defined as: * Smoked at least 100 cigarettes in lifetime * Smoked daily in the past 7 days, and at least 5 cigarettes per day, verified by expired CO ≥ 5 parts per million \[ppm\] Smokerlyzer CO+ monitor), * Smoke in their home * Expect to live in the subsidized housing site for at least 12 months * Age ≥ 18 years * Speak Chinese (Cantonese or Mandarin), English, Spanish, or Vietnamese * Able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Contraindication to any study-related procedures or assessment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of participants adopting a smoke-free home for ≥90 days | 6 months | The percentage of participants who reported to adopt a smoke-free home in the past 90 days will be reported |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of participants with point prevalent abstinence (PPA) | 6 months | The percentage of participants with carbon dioxide (CO)-verified tobacco abstinence will be reported at the 6 month follow-up visit. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of participants adopting a cannabis-free home among cannabis users | 6 months | The percentage of participants who reported to adopt a cannabis-free home in the past 90 days will be reported |
Countries
United States