Skip to content

Cefepime-taniborbactam vs Meropenem in Adults With VABP or Ventilated HABP

A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Cefepime-taniborbactam Compared to Meropenem in Adults With Ventilator Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (VABP) or Ventilated Hospital Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (vHABP)

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06168734
Acronym
CERTAIN-2
Enrollment
0
Registered
2023-12-13
Start date
2025-06-30
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hospital-acquired Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

Keywords

Ventilated Pneumonia, Hospital Acquired Pneumonia, Bacterial Pneumonia, VABP, vHABP

Brief summary

This is a Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime-taniborbactam compared to meropenem in patients ≥ 18 years of age with ventilated HABP or VABP.

Interventions

Cefepime-taniborbactam administered 2.5g q8h intravenously (IV) over a 4-hour period for 7 days to 14 days at the investigator's discretion. Dose adjustments for renal function may apply.

DRUGMeropenem

Meropenem will be administered 2g q8h IV over 4 hours for 7 days to 14 days at the investigator's discretion. Dose adjustments for renal function may apply.

Sponsors

Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
CollaboratorFED
Venatorx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

A double-blind design is used to maintain blinding for all personnel involved with the evaluation of patient efficacy and safety during the study. With the exception of the unblinded pharmacist or designee, unblinded study monitors and scientists conducting plasma assays and analyses for PK assessments, the sponsor, investigator, patient, and study site staff, will remain blinded to study drug.

Intervention model description

The study will randomize approximately 316 patients with vHABP or VABP into 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio (158 patients to cefepime-taniborbactam; 158 patients to meropenem).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, ≥18 years of age. * The patient or patient's legally authorized/acceptable representative (LAR) has voluntarily signed and dated the IRB/IEC approved ICF * Meets the clinical diagnosis of ventilated HABP or VABP * Have at least one of the following clinical criteria: 1. New onset or worsening of pulmonary symptoms and signs 2. New onset or worsening of purulent respiratory secretions 3. Hypoxemia 4. Need for acute changes in ventilator support * Have at least one of the following clinical criteria: 1. Documented fever (defined as body temperature ≥ 38°C \[100.4°F\] 2. Hypothermia (defined as body temperature ≤ 35°C \[95°F\]) 3. White blood cell (WBC) ≥10,000 cells/mm3 or ≤4,500 cells/mm3 4. \>15% immature neutrophils (bands). * Have new or worsening infiltrate on a pulmonary imaging study that is consistent with bacterial pneumonia within 48 hours prior to randomization. * Have a lower respiratory tract specimen sent for Gram stain and quantitative culture within 36 hours prior to the first dose of study drug.

Exclusion criteria

* Receipt of effective antibacterial treatment for pneumonia for a continuous duration of \>24 hours during the previous 72 hours prior to randomization. * Pneumonia known or suspected to be caused by: 1. A bacterial pathogen resistant to meropenem, as assessed by susceptibility testing or against which either one or both study drugs lack activity 2. Viruses, atypical bacteria, or fungi * Use of non-study systemic gram-negative therapy. * Confounding respiratory conditions. * Receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). * Patients with refractory septic shock. * Active immunosuppression. * Has a history of serious hypersensitivity (e.g., anaphylaxis), serious allergy, or any serious reaction to cephalosporin, penicillin, carbapenem, or other β-lactam antibiotics. * Female patients who are pregnant. * Patients with eGFR \<10 mL/min/1.73 m2 or are receiving or starting renal replacement therapy or expected to require renal replacement therapy during the treatment phase of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ACM through Study Day 14Evaluated on Day 15The primary endpoint is ACM, a binary variable, through Study Day 14. The primary endpoint is evaluated in the ITT population and is based on the patient's survival status through Study Day 14.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ACM through Study Day 28Evaluated on Day 29-33ACM through Study Day 28; analyzed in ITT and MITT analysis populations.
Safety OutcomesFrom first dose up to Day 33Safety assessments include the incidence of TEAEs and SAEs, and discontinuation of study drug due to TEAEs.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026