Skip to content

The Effect of Manual Lymphatic Drainage on Acute and Post-acute Ankle Sprain in Athletes

THE EFFECT OF MANUAL LYMPHATIC DRAINAGE ON ACUTE AND POST-ACUTE ANKLE SPRAIN IN ATHLETES

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06168240
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-12-13
Start date
2024-02-29
Completion date
2024-05-31
Last updated
2024-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankle Sprains

Keywords

Ankle sprain, Athletes, Manual lymphatic drainage

Brief summary

Manual lymphatic drainage techniques (MLDTs) are special techniques in manual therapy used in rehabilitation for treatment of physical dysfunctions and pathologies. Such practices could be done by medical team or clinicians. Theories on MLDTs address functions like stimulating the lymphatic system by increasing lymph circulation, facilitating the removal of waste products from body tissues, reducing edema, and decreasing the responses of sympathetic nervous system while increasing the parasympathetic nervous tone leading to a relaxed body state.

Detailed description

This study will examine the effect of manual lymphatic drainage on pain intensity, ankle swelling, range of motion, static and dynamic functional stability in acute and post-acute ankle sprain in athletes. Edema treatment includes a variety of techniques; elevation, compression, electrical stimulation, ultrasound, and massage are a few of them. Profound clinical check is required to determine the kind of edema management. However, the effect of these techniques on the lymphatic system and the edema itself is questionable. Manual Lymphatic Drainage mechanism, although still under investigation, is also a valid treatment management that does not cause inflammation, reduces the absorption of waste products and excess fluid and still urges the lymphatic system to work better.

Interventions

OTHERManual lymphatic drainage. will be applied three days per week for four weeks.

Training will applied 3 days a week, for a total of 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Sylvia Maher Mohsen Farid Hanna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. . Basketball Athletes patients diagnosed as acute and post-acute ankle sprain. 2. Patients within 18 and 30 years old. 3. Patients with grade I, II ankle inversion sprain. 4. All participants complains of pain and moderate swelling in the ankle.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous ankle surgery. 2. Serious pathology. 3. History of fractures in the ankle joint. 4. Vascular disorders. 5. Grade III ankle sprain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
static balancestarting and after 4 weeksFlamingo Balance Test to assess static balance
dynamic postural balancestarting and after 4 weeksStar Excursion Balance Test to assess dynamic postural balance

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensitystarting and after 4 weeksNumeric Pain Rating Scale to assess pain intensity with zero score represents no pain (the better) and ten score represents maximum pain (the worest).
swellingstarting and after 4 weeksFigure of Eight with tape measurement by tape measurement to assess swelling in centimeter
range of motionstarting and after 4 weeksGoniometer to assess range of motion

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026