Skip to content

Metoclopramide for Gastric Visualization in Active Upper GI Bleeding

Efficacy of Metoclopramide for Gastric Visualization by Endoscopy in Patients With Active Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Multicenter, Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06167837
Enrollment
220
Registered
2023-12-13
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2023-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper GI Bleeding

Keywords

active upper GI bleeding, EGD, Gastric visualization, Metoclopramide

Brief summary

This study aim to evaluate the efficacy of metoclopramide for gastric visualization in patients with active UGIB. This is a double-blinded, multicenter RCT. Patients with 'active' UGIB (hematemesis or presence of fresh blood in the nasogastric tube) were enrolled. The eligible patients were randomly assigned in a concealed 1:1 allocation to received either intravenous metoclopramide or placebo before endoscopy. The primary outcome was 'adequate visualization' by objective endoscopic visualized scores(EVS). Secondary outcomes included mean difference in total EVS and EVS at each location , duration of EGD, immediate hemostasis, need for a second look EGD, units of blood transfusion, length of hospital stay and 30-day rebleeding rate.

Detailed description

* This is double-blinded, multicenter RCT including six hospitals in Thailand. * The participated endoscopists had work experience for endoscopy more than three years. * All endoscopists at six participating sites attended the pre-study meeting for standardization of the protocol and scoring system. * The primary outcome was 'adequate visualization' by objective endoscopic visualized scores(EVS). ; To assess overall endoscopic visualization, we estimated the coverage of a blood clot on mucosa in four locations including 1) gastric fundus, 2) corpus, 3) antrum and 4) duodenal bulb, according to the reference endoscopic views in protocal. * All photos, including the reference endoscopic views, were taken and internally validated by another endoscopist who was blinded to the randomization allocation. * This study includes pre-specified subgroup analysis by location of bleeding including gastric subgroup analysis.

Interventions

DRUGMetoclopramide Sulfone

Metoclopramide 10mg+NSS 10 ml IV 30-60 minutes before EGD

Normal saline 10 ml IV 30-60 minutes before EGD

Sponsors

King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients (aged ≥ 18years) * Active UGIB who arrived at emergency room (ER) and had a schedule for EGD within 12 hours after onset of bleeding ; Active UGIB was defined as having hematemesis or fresh blood by diagnostic gastric lavage at the ER.

Exclusion criteria

* known allergy to metoclopramide * prior gastric or duodenal surgery * known case of esophageal, gastric or duodenal cancer; * advanced HIV infection (defined as WHO criteria13-15: CD4 \<200 cell/mm3 or WHO clinical stage 3 or 4) * pregnancy * gastric lavage was performed with solution \> 50 ml.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients with 'adequate visualization'Through study completion, estimate 2 years'adequate visualization' is determined by objective scoring method (endoscopic visualized scores (EVS) to estimate the coverage of a blood clot on mucosa in four locations including 1) gastric fundus, 2) corpus, 3) antrum and 4) duodenal bulb; At each location was assessed and scored between 0 and 2: 0, blood clot cover more than 75% of the surface ; 1, 25-75% blood clot coverage ; 2, blood clot coverage less than 25%. ; score \>=6 considered as adequate visualization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The mean difference in EVSThrough study completion, estimate 2 yearstotal of four locations and at each location including fundus, corpus, antrum and duodenal bulb
Duration of esophagogastroduodenoscopy10minutes to 2 hours
Immediate hemostasisThrough study completion, estimate 2 yearsRate of succession of hemostasis (bleeding stop) at first EGD
30-day rebleeding rateUp to 30 daysrate of 30-day rebleeding of upper GI tract
Number of unit of red blood cell transfusion during first 24 hoursUp to 24 hoursNumber of of unit of red blood cell transfusions during first 24 hours
Length of hospital stays1day - 30daysLength of hospital stays of participants
The need for a second look EGD within 72 hours after initial endoscopyUp to 72 hoursRate of need for a second look EGD within 72 hours after initial endoscopy The 72-hour recurrent GI bleeding was documented and re-EGD was performed to confirm rebleeding if the following conditions were met: I) hematemesis or bloody nasogastric tube (NG) \> 6 hours after endoscopy; II) melena after normalization of stool color; III) hematochezia after normalization of stool color or melena; IV) development of tachycardia (HR ≥ 110 bpm) or hypotension(SBP ≤ 90 mmHg) after ≥ 1 hour of vital sign stability without other cause; V) hemoglobin drop of ≥ 2 g/dL after two consecutive stable hemoglobin values ( \< 0.5 g/dL decrease) ≥ 3 hours apart; VI) tachycardia or hypotension that does not resolve within 8 hours after index endoscopy despite appropriate resuscitation (in the absence of an alternative explanation), associated with persistent melena or hematochezia or; VII) persistently dropping hemoglobin of \> 3 g/dL in 24 hours associated with persistent melena or hematochezia.

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Primary ContactThanrada Vimonsuntirungsri, MD
aa_choc@docchula.com+66853356240

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026