Skip to content

Comparison of Denture Base Adaptation and Per-iimplant Tissue Health Between CAD and CAM Implant Overdenture

Comparison of Denture Base Adaptation and Per-implant Tissue Health Between CAD and CAM Implant Retained Complete Overdenture

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06166446
Enrollment
15
Registered
2023-12-12
Start date
2022-01-15
Completion date
2023-02-02
Last updated
2023-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periimplantitis

Brief summary

Background: Complete overdenture manufacturing has been greatly developed using computer-aided designing and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology. Material and method: 15 completely edentulous patients, divided into two groups, received two implants in the mandibular canine area with ball attachment. The first group received a CAD/CAM-milled mandibular overdenture and a maxillary acrylic conventional complete denture, while the second group received a 3D-printed mandibular overdenture and a maxillary acrylic complete denture. Peri-implant soft tissue and denture adaptation were evaluated using clinical parameters

Detailed description

Background: In recent years, complete overdenture manufacturing has been greatly developed using computer-aided designing and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology. This clinical study compared the soft tissue health between CAD/CAM-milled and 3D-printed implants that retained complete overdentures. Material and method: 15 completely edentulous patients, divided into two groups, received two implants in the mandibular canine area with ball attachment. The first group received a CAD/CAM-milled mandibular overdenture and a maxillary acrylic conventional complete denture, while the second group received a 3D-printed mandibular overdenture and a maxillary acrylic complete denture. Peri-implant soft tissue was evaluated using clinical parameters including the gingival index, plaque index, bleeding index, and probing depth at the time of mandibular complete overdenture insertion (T0), six months (T6), and twelve months (T12) of denture use.

Interventions

DEVICEsubtractive technique

The milled denture teeth are then bonded into the milled recesses using a special PMMA bonding system.

DEVICEadditive technique

The denture teeth were printed as one unit using the same method with tooth resin (DENTCA Denture Tooth, Shade A2).

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Intervention model description

15 completely edentulous patients, divided into two groups, received two implants in the mandibular canine area with ball attachment. The first group received a CAD/CAM-milled mandibular overdenture and a maxillary acrylic conventional complete denture, while the second group received a 3D-printed mandibular overdenture and a maxillary acrylic complete denture. Peri-implant soft tissue was evaluated using clinical parameters including the gingival index, plaque index, bleeding index, and probing depth at the time of mandibular complete overdenture insertion (T0), six months (T6), and twelve months (T12) of denture use.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
58 Years to 68 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

poor denture adaptation co-operative patients

Exclusion criteria

metabolic diseases uncontrolled diabetes osteoporosis and hyperparathyroidism.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Plaque Index12 monthsa calibrated pressure sensitive plastic periodontal probe, the distance between marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026