Skip to content

Clinical Performance of a Flowable Bulk Fill Composite Versus a Highly Viscous Glass-ionomer Cement in Primary Molars

Clinical Performance of a Flowable Bulk Fill Composite Versus a Highly Viscous Glass-ionomer Cement in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06166160
Enrollment
118
Registered
2023-12-12
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2023-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Management of Dental Caries of Primary Molars

Keywords

bulk-fill flowable composite , high viscous GIC ,

Brief summary

the study was conducted to compare and evaluate the clinical performance of EQUIA Forte and SDR® flow+ in class II cavities in primary molar

Detailed description

Initial intra-oral periapical bitewing radiographs of the teeth to be treated were taken before the procedure. After obtaining partial isolation using cotton rolls and saliva ejector, caries excavation and removal of undermined enamel will be done using high-speed diamond burs with water cooling and hand instruments. After finishing the cavity, a matrix band will be placed with the interproximal wedge. The prepared cavities will be restored using Equia Forte or flowable bulk-fill composite resin according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Interventions

OTHERBulk fill flowable composite SDR Dentsply sirona

caries removal in class II cavities of primary molars and application of experminted restorations

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. 4 to 8 years old medically free children. 2. Cooperative children are classified as class 3 or 4 based on Frankel et al. classification. 3. Children who had at least one active dentinal carious lesion on the proximal surface of primary molars

Exclusion criteria

1. Refusal of the parents to sign the informed consent 2. Presence of deep bite or any pictures of malocclusion and parafunctional habits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical performanceone-yearThe difference in the clinical performance flowable bulk fill composite SDR® flow+ and and high viscous glass-ionomer cement(EQUIA Forte) In Class II cavities in primary molars using FDI criteria

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMarina F Fahmy, MD
Dr.marina.fakhry@gmail.com01273731722

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026