Skip to content

Long-term Evaluation of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Autologous Bone Marrow Concentrate Infiltration vs. Hyaluronic Acid

Long-term Evaluation of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Autologous Bone Marrow Concentrate Infiltration vs. Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis. Prospective Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06164899
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-12-11
Start date
2024-02-09
Completion date
2025-02-12
Last updated
2025-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

hyaluronic acid injection, BMAC injection, Bone Marrow aspirate concentrate, long term follow-up, Prospective observational study, Hyalorunic acid, knee joint

Brief summary

This is a prospective observational study for long-term clinical evaluation (minimum 4-year follow-up) in patients treated within the research protocol OA-bi-blind (Double-blind randomized trial on the treatment of bilateral knee osteoarthritis: Autologous bone marrow concentrate VS. hyaluronic acid)

Detailed description

60 patients treated within the OA-bi-blind research protocol from 2016 to 2019 at the II Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic of the Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute will be recruited. These are patients undergoing infiltration for the treatment of bilateral gonarthrosis of autologous bone marrow concentrate vs. hyaluronic acid within the OA-bi-Blind Research protocol.Prior to enrollment, patients will be contacted provided they have released their personal or legal guardian's e-mail address and/or personal or legal guardian's telephone number in advance and only after verifying the patient's consent to be contacted again for research purposes. If the patient is interested in participating in the study, arrangements will be made with him or her to send the Informed Consent and Disclosure Letter. The patient will have to return (by means of a pre-stamped envelope that he will have received together with the consent itself) the Informed Consent completed in all its parts to the address given in the information letter. Only upon obtaining the fully completed Informed Consent may the investigator subject the patient to a telephone interview. Alternatively, the patient may receive the Informed Consent and the questionnaire for clinical evaluations digitally.Clinical score data will be collected from the questionnaires conducted at long-term follow-up of patients enrolled in the study. The data collected during the long-term follow-up, will be used to evaluate the time course of outcomes after treatment with autologous bone marrow concentrate versus hyaluronic acid in patients who received either treatment as per the ''OA-bi-blind'' protocol.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Patients undergoing injection for the treatment of bilateral gonarthrosis of autologous bone marrow concentrate vs. hyaluronic acid within the OA-bi-Blind Research protocol at the II Orthopedic and Trauma Clinic of the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute. Who met the following criteria at the time of treatment: * Male or female patients, aged 18 to 75 years; * Symptomatic bilateral knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-4); * Failure after at least 2 months of conservative treatment; * Ability and consent of patients to actively participate in the rehabilitation protocol and clinic and radiological follow-up; And who meet the following criteria at the time of assessment by telephone or via telemedicine platform; * Capable patients * Signature of informed consent * Availability

Exclusion criteria

* Patients no longer on call; * Patients who do not agree to undergo evaluation * Patients who have passed away.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (IKDC)-Subjective Knee Evaluation FormbaselineThis is a subjective, knee-specific rating scale that is considered one of the most reliable assessment tools in the evaluation of knee pathology. The questionnaire examines 3 categories: symptoms, sports activity, and knee function. According to this questionnaire, a score between 0 and 100 can be obtained, where a high score is associated with a high level of function and minor pain symptoms. A score of 100 is in fact interpreted as a condition in which there are neither limitations in conducting activities of daily living nor symptoms.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score- (KOOS Score)baselineThe full questionnaire consists of five subscales and they cover: pain (9 items), symptoms (7 items of which two relate to stiffness), functions and activities of daily living (17 items) physical function, sports activities and leisure (5 items) and quality of life in relation to the knee (4 items). All items in the relevant subscales have the same response mode, use a 5-point Likert scale, and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no difficulty and 4 a severe difficulty). Score range 0-100 for each subscale
EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS )baselineThis is a visual analog scale that has a range of scores from 0 (worst imaginable health condition) to 100 (best imaginable health condition).
Tegner ScorebaselineThis questionnaire allows the estimation of a subject's motor activity level with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports, such as soccer at the national or international level. This score is the one most commonly used to define the motor activity level of patients with knee disorders. In the study, the Tegner Score will be filled in directly by the investigator, through an interview the patient. In addition, questions will also be asked about return to sports and pre-injury, pre-treatment and recovered/achieved sports level .
EQ-5D (EuroQoL) Current Health AssessmentbaselineEQ-5D is a standardized measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group to provide a simple generic questionnaire for use in clinical and economic evaluation and population health surveys
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)baselineA tool to assess patient satisfaction in consideration of their current degree of pain, function, and daily activity. Patients can express if their state of health will be satisfying, answering yes or no.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)baselineVisual analog scale consisting of a straight line segment (10 cm length), the ends of which correspond to no pain (0) and the strongest pain imaginable (10).
Final treatment opinionbaselineThe patient should indicate satisfaction and relative degree with the treatment performed after a minimum of 4 years after infiltrative treatment. All patients will be able to indicate their health condition by choosing from this answers: much better, somewhat better, no change, a little worse, much worse.
FailurebaselineThe patient will be asked to indicate whether and when new infiltrative or surgical treatment was performed. Questions will also be asked about any complications and reinterventions

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026