Skip to content

Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System on Zygomatic Implant Placement

Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System on Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06155799
Enrollment
8
Registered
2023-12-04
Start date
2022-11-15
Completion date
2024-07-15
Last updated
2023-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implants, Surgery, Computer-Assisted

Keywords

Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Dental implant, Navigation system

Brief summary

This study consists in a randomized controlled trial which objective is to assess the accuracy of a dynamic navigation system in zygomatic implant placement in partially or total edentulous patients in the upper jaw compared with the conventional freehand method.

Detailed description

The present study is a prospective randomized clinical trial. Each patient enrolled in this trial will be randomly allocated to on group (Navigation group (test group) or Freehand group (control group)). Preoperative virtual planification of zygomatic an conventional implants on a prerequired cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with radiographic markers (tooth if possible or micro implants if not possible) will be performed for each patient. The patient will be randomly allocated in one group just before the surgery, and the surgical procedure will be performed according the surgery protocol of each group. Then, after the surgical procedure a PROMs questionnaire will be asked to the patients. Finally a postoperative CBCT will be performed and overlapped with the preoperative CBCT with the implants planification and implant position deviations between the planned and final position will be measured. The study devices are European Conformity (CE) marked products and used within their intended use.

Interventions

DEVICEFreehand zygomatic implant placement

Zygomatic implants will be placed without any guidance after preoperative virtual planning has been performed.

Sponsors

Principal Investigator: Bassel Traboulsi-Garet. Master of Oral Surgery and Implantology. University of Barcelona
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Study Chair: Javier Bara-Casaus. Head of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Institute. University Hospital Sagrat Cor, Barcelona.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Study Chair: Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón. Full professor of Oral Surgery. University of Barcelona
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Study Chair: Octavi Camps-Font. Lecturer in Oral Surgery. University of Barcelona
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Study Director: Maria Angels Sanchez-Garces. Associate professor in Oral Surgery. University of Barcelona
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patient will be unaware of which group since during the surgical procedure patient eyes' will be covered. Outcome assessor won't take part of the clinical process and will be blinded regarding which group is allocated each patient.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Partial or total edentulous maxilla * Large bone atrophy that avoids possible conventional implant placement * Over 18 years old patients

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with facial bone disease that contraindicates conventional or zygomatic implants placement. * Systemic or local conditions that contraindicates oral surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angular deviation1 monthAngular deviation between the virtual planed position of the implant and the final implant position. Measured in degrees
Platform 3D deviation1 monthGlobal deviation at the platform of the zygomatic implant between the virtual planned position and the final position of the dental implant measured in the 3 axes of the space (3D deviation). Measured in millimeters (mm).
Apex 3D deviation1 monthGlobal deviation at the apex of the dental implant between the virtual planned position and the final position of the dental implant measured in the 3 axes of the space (3D deviation). Measured in millimeters (mm).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-reported outcome measures questionnaireOne week post operativePatients perception of therapy functional well-being and health status during the dental implant treatment with a navigation system. The scale goes from 0 to 4, where higher scores mean worse outcome.
Time of surgery24 hoursTwo times of surgery were recorded: time of drilling, from the first drilling of the first zygomatic implant to the last zygomatic implant placement; and time of complete surgery procedure, from first incision to suture.
Complications6 monthsNumber of intra and postoperative complications and what kind of complication it was.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactBassel Traboulsi garet, DDS
basselt.121@gmail.com616239499

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026