Kyphosis, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, SPINAL Fracture, Spinal Stenosis, Thoracolumbar Kyphosis, Vertebral Fractures
Conditions
Keywords
Robot assisted spinal fusion
Brief summary
This multicenter, non-comparative clinical trial, led by two principal investigators in Spain, aims to evaluate the safety and performance of a robotic assistant, based on a electromechanical tracking system, in patients requiring transpedicular screw fixation. The study, conducted in two different hospital centers, involves patients with vertebral fractures, spinal stenosis, kyphosis, and other related conditions. The primary objective is to determine screw accuracy by assessing the degree of screw invasion into the pedicle using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, with a target of achieving 96% acceptable screw placement. Trained radiologists will evaluate the screw invasion into the pedicle. The study is scheduled to span 12 months and each intervention includes a 1-month follow-up. Throughout this time frame, patients will undergo regular assessments, and outcomes will be closely monitored.
Detailed description
Multicenter non-comparative clinical trial. This interventional study aims to assess the safety and performance of a robotic assistant, based on a electromechanical tracking system, in patients requiring transpedicular screw fixation.The primary focus is on overcoming the limitations of traditional minimally invasive surgeries and enhancing the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, especially within the complex pedicle region adjacent to the spinal canal. The study design is a prospective interventional trial conducted in two hospital centers in Spain, with two principal investigators leading the investigation. Patients requiring transpedicular screw fixation will be recruited. The robotic assistant will be employed to facilitate transpedicular screw fixation. The system aims to improve accuracy and safety in screw placement, in comparison with conventional techniques used. Patients will include individuals with spinal fractures, spinal stenosis, kyphosis, and other conditions requiring transpedicular screw fixation. Two principal investigators in Spain will lead the recruitment process. The study aims to answer several key questions: * Determine Screw Accuracy: Assess the degree of screw invasion into the pedicle using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, with a target of achieving 96% acceptable screw placement. * Evaluate Planning vs. Final Screw Placement: Determine the accuracy of screw placement by comparing planned positions with the actual final positions. * System Performance: Assess the overall performance of the robotic system during the surgical procedure. * Reoperation and Postoperative Time: Determine the need for reoperation and evaluate postoperative recovery time. * Adverse Events: Detect and document any adverse events occurring during the surgical process. Trained radiologists will play a crucial role in evaluating the accuracy of screw placement, focusing on the degree of invasion into the pedicle using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. The study is set to span a duration of 12 months,during which patients will undergo regular assessments, and outcomes will be closely monitored. The inclusion of the electromechanical tracking system in the robotic assistant adds a technological dimension to the investigation, contributing to advancements in the field of minimally invasive spinal surgeries.
Interventions
PROCEDURERobot assisted spinal transpedicular fixation
Surgical technique which joins two or more vetebrae with screws and rods to prevent any relative movement between them. It is a major surgery that usually lasts several hours and in which the patient is subjected to general anesthesia. The screws to be placed go through a narrow area of the vertebra known as the pedicle. Each patient will undergo a singular intervention.
Sponsors
Cyber Surgery S.L.
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient scheduled for spinal fusion Surgery requiring pedicle screw insertion. * Open or minimally invasive (MIS) technique. * Spinal regions: lumbar, thoracic and/or sacral (one patient may cover several regions). * Signed informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Paediatric patient (\< 18 years) * Pedicular Surgery history with screw insertion in the vertebra to be operated. * Any contraindication for the pedicular screw placement. * Severe scoliosis. * Severe osteoporosis. * Infection or neoplasia. * Obesity. * Pregnancy and lactancy. * Any other disease or disorder that, in the opinión of the neurosurgeron, may put the patient at risk or may influence the results of the study. * Simultaneous participation in other clinical studies. * For whatever reason, the Clinical protocol cannot be followed. * The patient is unable, or unwilling, to sign the informed consent. * Patients in emergency situation who are not legally able to participate in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Grade of screw invasion into the pedicle based on Gertzbein-Robbins scale (A-E grade) | 1 month follow-up | Grade A: Screw position within the pedicle. Grade B: Cortical breakage ≤2mm. Grade C: Cortical breakage ≤4mm. Grade D: Cortical breakage ≤6mm. Grade E: Cortical breakage \>6mm. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| System performance - Fiducial Registration Error, FRE (mm) | 3 months | — |
| System performance - Screw position deviation - Spatial deviation in XY plane (mm) | 1 month follow-up | — |
| System performance - Screw position deviation - Spatial deviation in XZ plane (mm) | 1 month follow-up | — |
| System performance - Screw position deviation - Spatial deviation in YZ plane (mm) | 1 month follow-up | — |
| System performance - Screw position deviation - Angular deviation in XY plane (deg.) | 1 month follow-up | — |
| System performance - Screw position deviation - Angular deviation in XZ plane (deg.) | 1 month follow-up | — |
| System performance - Screw position deviation - Angular deviation in YZ plane (deg.) | 1 month follow-up | — |
| Adverse Events, AE | 1 month follow-up | — |
| Severe Adverse Events, SAE | 1 month follow-up | — |
| Patient characteristics - Demographic dates - Sex (Male/Female) | 3 months | — |
| Patient characteristics - Demographic dates - Age (years) | 3 months | — |
| Patient characteristics - Demographic dates - Weight (kg) | 3 months | — |
| Patient characteristics - Demographic dates - Height (cm) | 3 months | — |
| Patient characteristics - BMI | 3 months | W \[kg\]/H \[m2\] |
| Patient characteristics - Spinal Region (Thoracic/Lumbar/Sacral) | 3 months | — |
| Patient characteristics - Vertebrae for study (T1...T12/L1...L5/S1-S2) | 3 months | — |
| Patient characteristics - Comobidities | 3 months | Charlson Index (1-6 pts) |
| Patient characteristics - Number of screws to be placed | 3 months | — |
| Implant characteristics - Planned vertebrae | 3 months | — |
| Implant characteristics - Laterality (L/R) | 3 months | — |
| Implant characteristics - Screw orientation in sagittal plane (Cranial/Caudal/Neutral) | 3 months | — |
| System performance - Number of image registration | 1 month follow-up | — |
| System performance - Number of screws not inserted using the robotic assistant | 1 month follow-up | — |
| System performance - Number of colisioned screws | 1 month follow-up | — |
| Implant characteristics - Screw orientation in axial plane (Medial/Lateral/Neutral) | 3 months | — |
| Implant characteristics - Screw dimensions - Screw diameter (mm) | 3 months | — |
| Implant characteristics - Screw dimensions - Screw length (mm) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Surgical technique (open/MIS) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - ASA Anaesthesia (I-IV) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Radiation emission - Time (sec.) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Radiation emission - Dosage (mGy) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Intraoperatice blood loss (ml) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Number of gauzes used | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Postoperative drainage (ml) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery - Total (min.) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Power on and disposition (min.) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Planification (min.) | 3 months | — |
| System performance - Number of not reachable screws | 1 month follow-up | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Positioning (min.) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Surgery (min.) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Removal and power off (min.) | 3 months | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Postoperative stay (days) | 1 month follow-up | — |
| Clinical Intervention - Blood loss - Duration of surgery per stages - Image registration (min.) | 3 months | — |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed