Skip to content

SpO2 Accuracy of Noninvasive Pulse Oximeter Sensor With Motion Conditions

Post-Launch Hypoxia Clinical Study Protocol for Reprocessed Masimo RD SET Pulse Oximeters With Motion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06149416
Enrollment
11
Registered
2023-11-29
Start date
2023-05-27
Completion date
2023-05-28
Last updated
2025-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy, Hypoxia

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the Stryker Sustainability Solutions pulse oximetry sensors during motion conditions over the range of 70 -100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry during conditions in which the subject is moving. The end goal is to provide supporting documentation for the SpO2 accuracy validation of the reprocessed sensors with motion indications.

Detailed description

In this study, the level of oxygen within the blood will be reduced in a controlled manner by reducing the concentration of oxygen the study volunteer breathes. The accuracy of a noninvasive pulse oximeter sensor will be assessed by comparison to the oxygen saturation measurements from a laboratory blood gas analyzer. A machine will be used to induce motions of 20 mm during testing at a sine rate of 2Hz, 3Hz, and 4Hz. A third motion moves the arm a random distance of 0 to 30mm at a random speed up to 5Hz. It is required that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance of the Stryker pulse oximetry sensors will meet a specification of +/-3% with a target of +/-3% or better in motion conditions for the range of 70 - 100% SaO2 (typically, saturation is determined once with air breathing and then at three or six levels, e.g. 94%, 90%, 85%, 80%, 75% and 70% or 95%, 85% and 75% saturation for about 30-60 seconds or 60-90 seconds at each level), thereby demonstrating an acceptable SpO2 accuracy performance specification. This study should utilize a three level structure (95%, 85% and 75%).

Interventions

DEVICEExperimental Masimo RD SET SpO2 Adhesive Sensors

Masimo RD SET SpO2 Adhesive Sensors, Adult (4000 Adt), Adult & Neonate (4003 Neo)

Sponsors

Stryker Sustainability Solutions
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The subject is male or female, aged ≥18 and \<50 * The subject is in good general health with no evidence of any medical problems. * The subject is fluent in both written and spoken English * The subject has provided informed consent and is willing to comply with the study procedures

Exclusion criteria

The subject is obese (BMI\>30) * The subject has a known history of heart disease, lung disease, kidney or liver disease * Diagnosis of asthma, sleep apnea, or use of CPAP * Subject has diabetes * Subject has a clotting disorder * The subject a hemoglobinopathy or history of anemia, per subject report or the first blood sample, that in the opinion of the investigator, would make them unsuitable for study participation * The subject has any other serious systemic illness * The subject is a current smoker * Any injury, deformity, or abnormality at the sensor sites that in the opinion of the investigators would interfere with the sensors working correctly * The subject has a history of fainting or vasovagal response * The subject has a history of sensitivity to local anesthesia * The subject has a diagnosis of Raynaud's disease * The subject has unacceptable collateral circulation based on exam by the investigator (Allen's test) * The subject is pregnant, lactating or trying to get pregnant * The subject is unable or unwilling to provide informed consent, or is unable or unwilling to comply with study procedures * The subject has any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigators would make them unsuitable for the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of Sensor by Comparing SpO2 Percent Blood Oxygen Saturation to SaO2 Percent Blood Oxygen Saturation Utilizing Arms Calculation Calculation [Time Frame: 1 - 5 Hours]1 - 5 hoursThe outcome of this study is the accuracy of the SpO2 (percent oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) measured by the Reprocessed Oximeter pulse oximetry sensors during motion conditions over the range of 70 - 100% saturation compared to SaO2 (percent oxygen saturation by co-oximetry from blood samples) from arterial blood samples. The accuracy is calculated using the Arms error between measured SpO2 and reference SaO2. The Arms must meet the 3% specification for each reprocessed pulse oximetry sensor style. Standard deviation of the differences is computed as the precision. Square root of the sum of the squares of bias and precision is computed as the Arms Error value.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Healthy Adult Participants
Experimental: Healthy adult participants All participants are enrolled in the test group and receive the noninvasive adhesive reprocessed pulse oximeter sensors Experimental Masimo RD SET SpO2 Adhesive Sensors: Masimo RD SET SpO2 Adhesive Sensors, Adult (4000 Adt), Adult & Neonate (4003 Neo)
11
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealthy Adult Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiethnic
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Accuracy of Sensor by Comparing SpO2 Percent Blood Oxygen Saturation to SaO2 Percent Blood Oxygen Saturation Utilizing Arms Calculation Calculation [Time Frame: 1 - 5 Hours]

The outcome of this study is the accuracy of the SpO2 (percent oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) measured by the Reprocessed Oximeter pulse oximetry sensors during motion conditions over the range of 70 - 100% saturation compared to SaO2 (percent oxygen saturation by co-oximetry from blood samples) from arterial blood samples. The accuracy is calculated using the Arms error between measured SpO2 and reference SaO2. The Arms must meet the 3% specification for each reprocessed pulse oximetry sensor style. Standard deviation of the differences is computed as the precision. Square root of the sum of the squares of bias and precision is computed as the Arms Error value.

Time frame: 1 - 5 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Masimo RD SET SpO2 Adhesive Sensors: Adult (4000 Adt), Adult & Neonate (4003)Accuracy of Sensor by Comparing SpO2 Percent Blood Oxygen Saturation to SaO2 Percent Blood Oxygen Saturation Utilizing Arms Calculation Calculation [Time Frame: 1 - 5 Hours]Device 1 4000-Adt Accuracy1.84 Root Mean Square Error (%)
Masimo RD SET SpO2 Adhesive Sensors: Adult (4000 Adt), Adult & Neonate (4003)Accuracy of Sensor by Comparing SpO2 Percent Blood Oxygen Saturation to SaO2 Percent Blood Oxygen Saturation Utilizing Arms Calculation Calculation [Time Frame: 1 - 5 Hours]Device 2 4003-Neo Accuracy2.33 Root Mean Square Error (%)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026