Skip to content

Effect of Progressive Neck Motor Control Exercises on Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction

Investigation of the Effect of Progressive Neck Motor Control Exercises on Craniocervical Pain, Posture, Function and Kinesiophobia in Different Types of Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06148818
Enrollment
75
Registered
2023-11-28
Start date
2024-11-04
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2025-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome

Keywords

Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome, Pain, neck motor control exercise, posture, kinesiophobia, function

Brief summary

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of progressive neck motor control exercises on craniocervical pain, posture, function and kinesiophobia in different types of temporomandibular dysfunction. The secondary aim of the study was to examine the differences between the effects of progressive neck motor control exercises on different types of temporomandibular dysfunction.

Detailed description

In this randomised controlled study, the effects of progressive neck motor control exercise therapy on craniocervical pain, posture, function and kinesiophobia in individuals with different types of temporomandibular dysfunction (myofascial, disc displacement with reduction, disc displacement without reduction) and their differences with the control group will be compared. Participants diagnosed by a dentist according to three different types of temporomandibular dysfunction will be included in the study. Participants will be divided into groups by block randomisation method. A total of 6 groups will be included in the study, including participants with three different types of temporomandibular dysfunction who voluntarily agree to participate in the study and meet the inclusion criteria, and the control group of each group. The study groups will receive the same treatment and patient education for 6 weeks, while the control groups will receive only patient education.

Interventions

OTHERProgressive neck motor control exercise therapy

The exercise programme will be conducted as a single session two days a week for 6 weeks. The sessions will always be conducted by the same physiotherapist. Each exercise session will consist of 10 minutes of warm-up exercises, 40 minutes of neck motor control exercises and 10 minutes of cool down exercises. Each exercise will be performed as 2 sets of 10 repetitions.

OTHERPatient education

The content of this education consists of information about the disease and symptoms, chewing recommendations, dietary changes, parafunctional habits, activities to be avoided, posture recommendations.

Sponsors

Karadeniz Technical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 55 years old, * Temporomandibular joint-related complaints for at least 3 months, * Temporomandibular dysfunction is diagnosed as a result of clinical and radiological evaluation by the dentist, * Neck pain of 3 or more according to the numeric pain scale

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive problems, * The one with the splint, * Those who have used painkillers or muscle relaxants for temporomandibular dysfunction complaints in the last 1 week, * With any systematic joint or muscle disease (e.g. fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis), * Those with serious systemic diseases, * Any neurological disorder (e.g. trigeminal neuralgia), * Pregnancy or breastfeeding, * Treated for Temporomandibular joint or orofacial muscle pain in the last 3 months, * Has undergone an operation/trauma to the cervical region and/or temporomandibular joint, * Positive vertebrobasilar artery test

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire1st, sixth week, first montAssessment of Mandibular Function
Fonseca Anamnestic Index1st, sixth week, first montAssessment of Temporomandibular Dysfunction Severity
Numeric Pain Scale1st, sixth week, first montAssessment of Pain, 0: No pain, 10: Maximum pain
Pressure pain threshold1st, sixth week, first montAssessment of Pressure pain threshold
Range of motion1st, sixth week, first montAssessment of Temporomandibular joint and neck range of motion
Joint position error test1st, sixth week, first montAssessment of Cervical proprioception
Endurance1st, sixth week, first montAssessment of Deep neck flexor endurance
Photographic Posture Analysis1st, sixth week, first montAssessment of head and neck posture

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tampa kinesiophobia scale1st, sixth week, first montAssessment of kinesiophobia for temporomandibular joint, 12 points: low kinesiophobia; 48 points:high kinesiophobia

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary Contactnurhayat korkmaz, PhDstudent
krkmznrhyt@gmail.com+90538736
Backup ContactNurhayat Korkmaz, MSc
krkmznrhyt@gmail.com+90538736

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026