Skip to content

Regression of Cervical Precancerous Lesions and Associated Risk Factors

Regression of Cervical Precancerous Lesions and Associated Risk Factors

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06147388
Acronym
RECER
Enrollment
300
Registered
2023-11-27
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2027-07-01
Last updated
2026-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervix Uteri SIL, CIN2, CIN3, HPV

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess the extent of histopathological regression of severe cervical precancerous lesions (CIN 2 and CIN 3); evaluate the proportion of patients who experience the normalization of HPV test and cytology finding among those who were treated conservatively and those who underwent conization; and identify predictive parameters associated with regression. Based on this analysis, a model will be proposed to predict the likelihood of lesion regression.

Detailed description

Introduction There are three grades of dysplasia of the cervix based on their severity (CIN 1-3). Most women with CIN 2 or CIN 3 (high-grade - HG lesions) are referred for conization due to the presumed risk of developing invasive cervical cancer. However, this surgical intervention is associated with an increased risk of preterm labor in the future. From the literature, it is evident that 30% - 60% of CIN 2 and CIN 3 lesions spontaneously regress. Colposcopic examination is a tool that can accurately assess the severity of the lesion and safely evaluate the dynamics of its development. It can be used to exclude the presence of invasive cervical cancer. The aim of the study is to determine the absolute rate of spontaneous regression of HG lesions, considering stratification factors. Methods Patients meeting all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are included (see below). Colposcopic evaluations occur at four-month intervals during the study. In case of progression, the patient is indicated for conization; in case of persistence, the patient is consulted and can choose further observation or conization; in case of regression, punch biopsy is performed to acquire a histopathologic sample for primary endpoint evaluation. The biopsy/conization result is subsequently compared with the initial sample to declare regression or persistence of the HG lesion. The HPV status and cytological findings are evaluated similarly. Stratification criteria such as age, colposcopic characteristics, HPV genotype (Cobas 4800, Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, USA), methylation markers (GynTect®, Oncgnostics GmbH, Löbstedter Str. 41, 07749 Jena, Germany), semiquantitative microscopic assessment of the vaginal swab, and personal history are assessed during monitoring.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTColposcopy

No surgery, observation

Sponsors

General University Hospital, Prague
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

1. squamocolumnar junction fully visualized 2. bioptically verified CIN 2 or CIN 3 3. age ≥ 18 years 4. age ≤ 40 years 5. informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. squamocolumnar junction not fully visualized 2. suspicion on glandular lesion 3. suspicion on invasive cancer 4. personal history of CIN 2, 3 or cerv. cancer 5. gravidity 6. HIV positivity 7. immunosuppression 8. impossible photographic documentation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Regression-rate of severe cervical precancerous lesions (CIN 2 and CIN 3) expressed through a comparison of initial and final histology3 yearsHistological results from the initial visit will be compared with the biopsy obtained during the last visit (or the specimen from conization) to determine whether regression or persistence of the high-grade lesion has occurred.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of HPV negativization in patients with spontaneous regression compared to patients with persistence after conization3 yearsThe proportion of patients with a negative result on the HPV DNA test obtained during the final visit will be assessed.
Rate of cytological normalization in patients with spontaneous regression compared to patients with persistence after conization3 years
Regression-rate considering specified stratification factors3 yearsSpecific factors will be evaluated to determine their influence on the regression or persistence of the cervical high-grade lesion. The following factors will be assessed: * CIN Grade (CIN 2 / CIN 3) * Immunohistochemically detected biomarkers * p16INK4a * Ki-67 * E4 * Gene methylation (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17, and ZNF671) * Histologically described cervicitis * Colposcopic Markers * Microbiological Markers * Selective HPV genotyping * Viral load * Anamnestic Data * Smoking * Age
Development of a model for predicting spontaneous regression3 years

Countries

Czechia

Contacts

CONTACTLukas Dostalek
lukas.dostalek@vfn.cz+420224967451

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026