Skip to content

The Validation of Rockall Scoring System in Predicting Outcomes From Variceal Bleeding

The Validation of Rockall Scoring System in Predicting Outcomes From Variceal Bleeding in Sudanese Patients: Cross-sectional Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06147115
Enrollment
150
Registered
2023-11-27
Start date
2012-06-01
Completion date
2012-09-10
Last updated
2023-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bleeding Esophageal

Brief summary

Objective This study aims to evaluate the validation of the Rockall scoring system in predicting the outcomes of variceal bleeding among Sudanese patients. Design/Method A cross-sectional hospital-based study involved 150 adult Sudanese patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) of variceal origin. Patients with UGIB resulting from causes other than varices and those who declined participation were excluded. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire complemented by upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy findings, and patients were followed up until discharge. Results The study encompassed 150 patients, predominantly male (117, 78%), aged between 18 and 60 years (n=119, 79%), residing mainly in central regions (134, 89%). The leading presenting complaints included hematemesis (70, 46.7%) and melena (22, 14.6%). Notably, peri-portal fibrosis (101, 67.3%) and cirrhosis (24, 16%) were the primary etiological factors, with a significant prevalence of alcohol consumption (87, 58%). Concerning the grade of esophageal varices, grades III and IV were most prevalent (67, 44.7% and 47, 31.3%, respectively), and fundal varices were identified in 13 patients (8.7%). The mean Rockall score was 3.83 ± 1.99, indicating moderate severity. Additionally, the Rockall score showed significant associations with the number of sessions, complications, bleeding recurrence, duration of hospital stay, and mortality (p \< 0.05). Conclusion Understanding the significance of the Rockall scoring system and its applicability to Sudanese patients with variceal bleeding has the potential to guide more effective strategies in the management of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing morbidity and mortality.

Interventions

OTHERAssessment tool to determine severity of GI bleeding

The Rockall score is a validated mortality risk assessment for patients admitted with upper GI bleeding.

Sponsors

National Center for Gastroentestinal and Liver Disease
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* aged 18 years and older * primary complaints of upper GI bleeding

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with upper GI bleeding resulting from causes other than varices * who declined to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the validation of the Rockall scoring system in predicting the outcomes of variceal bleeding among Sudanese patientsJune 2012 - Sep 2012The primary outcome measure in this study appears to be the validation of the Rockall scoring system in predicting the outcomes of variceal bleeding among Sudanese patients presenting to the Mohammed Salih Idris Bleeding Center (MSIBC). The study aims to assess the effectiveness of the Rockall scoring system in predicting mortality, bleeding recurrence, and other clinical outcomes in Sudanese patients with variceal bleeding. The Rockall scoring system incorporates various factors, including age, evidence of shock, coexisting medical conditions, and the presence of visible signs of hemorrhage. The study investigates the association between Rockall scores and clinical outcomes such as mortality, bleeding recurrence, complications, duration of hospital stay, and interventions conducted. The validation of the Rockall scoring system in the context of variceal bleeding in Sudan is crucial for risk stratification and guiding the management of patients with variceal bleeding.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026