Labor Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of our study is to use a biased coin up-down allocation methodology to estimate the dose of bupivacaine required after the lidocaine test dose to achieve initial effective comfort in 90% of patients (post test-dose ED90) via the epidural (DPE or EPL) technique in women undergoing labor induction or augmentation; the investigators hypothesize that the investigators will be able to determine the post test-dose ED90 of bupivacaine for each technique with adequate precision to inform the optimal doses to study in a subsequent randomized trial comparing the analgesic effects of DPE vs. EPL. The investigators also hypothesize that the post test-dose ED90 of bupivacaine is lower with a DPE technique than with a conventional epidural technique.
Detailed description
The investigators will be conducting a randomized controlled trial with patients randomized into either an EPL or a DPE group. For the first subject in the DPE and EPL techniques, the initial dose of bupivacaine 25 mg will be used, with an endpoint being the achievement of an NRS \< 3 at 30 min. Subsequent patients are administered bupivacaine doses determined by the response of the previous subject, as per the biased coin method. The subsequent up and down interval doses are bupivacaine 2.5 mg (1 mL) increments. Hence, if the first subject does not respond successfully, the dose for the second subject will be bupivacaine 27.5 mg. If the second subject does not respond successfully, the dose for the third subject will be bupivacaine 30 mg. By contrast, if a subject responds successfully, the bupivacaine dose will be decreased to 22.5 mg with a probability of 10% and maintained with a probability of 90% (ratio 1:9).
Interventions
DRUGBupivacaine Hydrochloride
Each subject will receive allocated dose of bupivacaine
Sponsors
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
A Randomized Biased-Coin Sequential Allocation Trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Parturient with no major co-morbidities 2. Singleton, vertex gestation at term (37-42 weeks) 3. Less than or equal to 5 cm dilation 4. Desire to receive epidural labor analgesia 5. Numerical Rating Scale greater than or equal to 5 (NRS 0-10, where 0 = no pain, and 10 = worst pain imaginable), at time of epidural labor analgesia request.
Exclusion criteria
1. Current or historical evidence of clinically significant disease or condition, including diseases of pregnancy (i.e., preeclampsia, gestational diabetes) 2. Any contraindication to the administration of an epidural technique (e.g., thrombocytopenia, antiplatelet meds). 3. History of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to an amide local anesthetic agent 4. Evidence of anticipated fetal complications (i.e., fetal anomalies, IUGR (Intrauterine Growth Restriction), oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| NRS <3 at 30 min | 30 minutes after time 0. | Adequate analgesia is defined as NRS score less than 3 at 30 minutes after time 0. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
CONTACTLawrence Tsen, MD
CONTACTAyumi Maeda, MD
Outcome results
None listed