Implant Site Reaction
Conditions
Keywords
Implant placement, native bone, regenerated bone, resonance frequency analysis, ISQ value, Ostell
Brief summary
Compare ISQ values of implants placed in antral area in native bone vs regenerated bone with a follow-up at 3 months to compare values changes.
Detailed description
The stability of dental implants is influenced by the type of bone in which the implant is placed. Native bone tends to provide better initial stability due to its density and quality, while regenerated bone, it is logical to think that it may present less stability due to the quality of the generated bone and the presence of defects in the treated area. In this study it has been observed that after 3 months more stability is observed in the antral area, measured in ISQ resonance frequency in implants on regenerated bone, which surprises us and this result is explained in detail in said study.
Interventions
Implant placement on grafted sinus vs antral autogenous bone
analysis of the ISQ evolution and its changes after 3 months of placing the implant in native or regenerated bone, always in the antral area
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients * Total superior edentulism or antral zone edentulism * Accepted study and signed inform consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patients under 23 years old * Non accepted study or signed inform consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Resonance frequency analysis (ISQ) measurements | 3 months | The day of surgery, data were collected by vestibular and palatal, in addition, the mean of both measurements was taken and ISQ data were collected vertically to complete all the information. After 3 months of implant placement we recorded the same measurements and compared them in native and regenerated bone. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Insertion torque measurements | During implant placement | Analysis of the insertion torque values measured in Newtons per centimeter (Ncm) and comparing the results of both groups. |
| Changes in the marginal bone | 3 months | Analysis of the changes in the marginal bone three months after implant placement |
Countries
Spain