Rotator Cuff Tears
Conditions
Keywords
Artificial intelligence, Machine Learning, Minimal Important Change
Brief summary
There is little overall evidence behind clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different machine learning models that use pre-operative data from an international and multicentric database to predict if a patient that underwent rotator cuff repair could achieve the minimal important change (MIC) for single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) at one year follow-up.
Interventions
Patients underwent an arthroscopic repair for rotator cuff lesions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Primarily treated for rotator cuff tears by partial or complete surgical repair with a planned arthroscopic procedure * Reparable tears * No language barrier hindering questionnaire completion or legal incompetence were not included
Exclusion criteria
* missing pre- or post-operative single-assessment numeric evaluation (SANE)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| SANE score | At 12 post-operative months | Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). From 0 (worst) to 100 (best). |
Countries
Switzerland