Developmental Delay
Conditions
Keywords
primary care, implementation, linkage
Brief summary
This proposal aims to test whether a proposed community-clinical linkage (CCL), an educational-medical linkage model, improves access to school-based services and subsequent child, parent, family and health service outcomes and offers a promising strategy to address longstanding racial, ethnic and income health care disparities among families with preschool children with developmental delays and disabilities. The investigators designed an educational-clinical linkage model, Preschool and Me (PreM) which incorporates key components of a CCL. It also utilizes a personalized medical-education care plan with remote lay navigator support to increase access to school-based services.
Detailed description
Participants (n=320) will be randomized to either: 1) 6 months of PreM (intervention group) or 2) a waitlist control arm receiving the intervention after a 6-month delay. All participants will be followed for 12 months with data collection occurring at 4 timepoints (baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-months). There will also be a simultaneously conducted mixed-methods implementation evaluation focusing on implementation outcomes to serve as indicators for implementation success; measures of implementation quality; and intermediate outcomes to understand and address successes and failures in relation to clinical outcomes.
Interventions
Utilizes patient navigation services and a medical-educational care plan to support linkages between medical and educational systems
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Parent-child dyads who meet inclusion criteria will be enrolled. Child inclusion criteria are: 1. Meets age requirements for early childhood special education (ECSE) services for Illinois (i.e., 3-5 years old); 2. diagnosed with a developmental delay or disability (DD) or determined to be at risk for DD (clinical concerns raised by primary care provider/healthcare provider or by parents at the time of enrollment); 3. is not receiving any ECSE services.
Exclusion criteria
if inclusion criteria is met, no other
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Timeliness of ECSE services | Up to 12 months | Calculate the time (number of days) from a child's 3rd birthday to 1) date of Individualized Education Plan (IEP) request; 2) date of IEP eligibility meeting; 3) attendance at preschool (first day); and 4) start date of first school-based therapy for those found eligible. |
| Percent of children who complete each step of IEP process | up to 12 months | Percent of children who complete each step of IEP process |
| Percent of children who receive school-based therapies | Up to 12 months | Increased access to early childhood special education (ECSE) services as measured by receipt of school-based services |
| Percent of children who enroll in a designated early childhood special education (ECSE) program or Chicago Public School | Up to 12 months | Increased access to early childhood special education (ECSE) as measured by enrollment in designated Chicago Early Learning Education Program or Chicago Public School |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction with the Interpersonal Relationship with the Navigator (PSN-I) | Up to 6 months | Satisfaction with the Interpersonal Relationship with the Navigator (PSN-I) is a 9 item questionnaire that examines participants perception of their PreM navigator; Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale with a higher score indicating a higher satisfaction with their interpersonal relationship with the patient navigator. |
| Acceptability of Intervention Measure | Up to 6 months | Acceptability of Intervention Measure examines participants acceptability of PreM; Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale with a higher score indicating a greater acceptability |
| Adoption | up to 6 months | Ratio of number of Primary Care Providers (PCPs) who referred to Preschool and Me (PreM) to total number of PCPs |
| Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) | up to 6 months | Intervention Appropriate Measure examines perception of the appropriateness of PreM; Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale with a higher score indicating a greater perception of appropriateness |
| Penetration | up to 6 months | Ratio of number of caregivers contacted by Patient Navigator (PN) to number of caregivers referred |
| Child sleep habits | Baseline, 12 month follow up | Exploratory outcome assessing sleep disturbance using the PROMIS Parent Proxy Sleep Disturbance questionnaire. This 8 question survey of sleep disturbances is scored on a 5-point scale. A higher score indicates poorer sleep hygiene. |
| Fidelity | up to 6 months | Per family ratio of number of PN activities conducted to number of activities that should be conducted according to protocol/job aid |
| Cost | up to 6 months | Time estimates of training and supervision; Per family time estimates associated with PN activities |
| Parental Quality of Life | Baseline and 12 months | Parent Quality of Life will be assessed using PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 6a which examines satisfaction with performing one's social roles and activities. Higher scores reflect more of the measured construct (i.e., ability to participate in social roles and activities). |
| Child quality of life | Baseline, 12 month follow up | Child quality of life will be assessed using questionnaires from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The questionnaires will examine quality of life under the follow domains: well being, relationships, emotional distress, and health. The questionnaires utilize a 5-point likert scale with higher scores reflecting more of the measured construct within the domain. |
| Feasibility of Intervention Measure | up to 6 months | Feasibility of Intervention Measure examines perception of the feasibility of PreM; Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale with a higher score indicating a greater perception of feasibility |
| Parenting stress | Baseline, 12 month follow up | Caregiver Strain Short Form consists of 11 items assessing the level of strain caregivers experience in caring for their child consisting of the following factors: objective strain, subjective internalized strain, and subjective externalized strain. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale that ranges from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Higher scores represent greater strain. |
| Family Functioning | Baseline, 12 month follow up | General Functioning 12-item subscale (GF12) of The McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD); The FAD consists of 7 scales: affective involvement, affective responsiveness, behavioral control, communication, problem solving, roles and general family functioning. Participants are asked to rate how well each statement describes their family on a 4 point scale. Higher scores indicate worse levels of family functioning. |
| Family-centered care self-assessment tool | Baseline, 12 month follow up | Family Centered Care Assessment Tool Community Systems of Services and Supports and Community Systems Integration and Care Coordination examines a participants perception of family-centered care received at their healthcare facility; Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1= never; 4= always) with higher scores indicating a greater perception of family-centered care. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
University of Illinois at Chicago