Skip to content

Real World Testing and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Subcutaneous EEG

Real World Testing and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Subcutaneous EEG (REAL-ASE)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06144047
Acronym
REAL-ASE
Enrollment
33
Registered
2023-11-22
Start date
2023-07-18
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2023-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Keywords

epilepsy, EEG, subcutaneous EEG, mobile devices, wearable devices

Brief summary

The study will investigate whether a novel method to accurately count epileptic seizures, using a CE-marked minimally-invasive ultra long-term subcutaneous electroencephalography (EEG) solution (UNEEG™ SubQ , including 24/7 EEG SubQ), (i) is more accurate than a participant-reported seizure diary; (ii) is feasible and acceptable to participants and clinicians; (iii) reduces impacts of epilepsy and improves quality-of-life; and (iv) provides gains to the healthcare system when rolled-out into the National Health Service (NHS). 33 participants with drug-resistant epilepsy will be implanted with the UNEEG™ SubQ device and will collect data for six months. Annotated seizures from the EEG data will be sent weekly to the treating clinicians, who will communicate with the participants on a monthly basis, and will be free to make any management changes.

Interventions

DEVICEEEG SubQ subcutaneous EEG device

2-channel subcutaneous EEG device

Sponsors

King's College Hospital NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
King's College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Have given written informed consent * Diagnosis of treatment-resistant epilepsy of any syndrome in which seizures are detectable in scalp EEG with two electrodes. * Adults (≥18 years of age) * Participant routinely keeps a seizure diary, has a smartphone and is willing to use the electronic diary for the study. * Experiencing ≥10 seizures per year according to their existing seizure diary. * Willing and able to comply with study procedures Key

Exclusion criteria

* Established current diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic attacks (dissociative seizures) * Frequent vigorous involuntary movements (eg. chorea, athetosis) or frequent parasomnias with major motor components (eg. sleep walking, night terrors)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid data review of 24/7 EEG SubQ solution6 monthsWithin-participant correlation between seizure counts per month estimated from rapid review of annotated 24/7 EEG™ SubQ data and 'ground truth' EEG seizure occurrences per month
Diagnostic accuracy of 24/7 EEG SubQ solution compared to diary6 monthsWithin-participant correlation between seizure counts per month from participant-reported seizure diary and 'ground truth' EEG seizure occurrences per month
Clinician rating of accuracy of 24/7 EEG SubQ6 monthsClinician rating of accuracy of 24/7 EEG SubQ solution

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants' perception of the value of receiving feedback about seizure occurrences estimated from EEG data recorded with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ6 monthsParticipants overall rating of the value of receiving feedback about seizures occurrences every month, across the full study period, from the EEG data recorded with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ
participants' acceptability of real-world implementation with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solutionbaseline, 2 months and 6 monthsPost-market surveillance questionnaire
Participant adherence with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution6 monthsWear time
Device deficiency6 monthsNumber of Device deficiencies
EQ-5D-5L scorebaseline, 2 months and 6 monthsChange over time for average EQ-5D-5L scores at baseline, 2- months and 6 months
Participant Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) scorebaseline, 2 months and 6 monthsChange over time for average Participant Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) scores at baseline, 2-months and 6 months
Perceived Self-Mastery Over Epilepsy scorebaseline, 2 months and 6 monthsChange over time for average Perceived Self-Mastery Over Epilepsy score at baseline, 2-months and 6 months
Impact of epilepsy scorebaseline, 2 months and 6 monthsChange over time for average Impact of epilepsy score at baseline, 2-months and 6 months
health economic impact of epilepsy for participants compared to historical controls6 monthsClient Services Receipt Inventory (CSRI) score at 6 months compared with the 138 participants in SMILE study in the treatment-as-usual arm
Cost-effectiveness of current practice and 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution6 monthsQuality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) score
EQ-5D-5L score comparison with historical controls6 monthsEQ-5D-5L score compared with the 138 participants in SMILE study in the treatment-as-usual arm
Participant Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) score comparison with historical controls6 monthsParticipant Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) score compared with the 138 participants in SMILE study in the treatment-as-usual arm
Impact of epilepsy score comparison with historical controls6 monthsImpact of epilepsy score compared with the 138 participants in SMILE study in the treatment-as-usual arm
Perceived Self-Mastery Over Epilepsy score comparison with historical controls6 monthsPerceived Self-Mastery Over Epilepsy score compared with the 138 participants in SMILE study in the treatment-as-usual arm
health economic impact of epilepsy for participants that have used the 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution6 monthsClient Services Receipt Inventory (CSRI) scores at 6 months
Clinical relevance of the 24/7 EEG SubQ solutionbaseline, 2 months and 6 monthsChange over time for average Health Care Professional (HCP) questionnaires 'Communication', 'Insight' & 'Potential of 24/7 EEG™' scores
Proportion of treating clinicians changing clinical managementmonths 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Proportion of treating clinicians changing clinical management throughout the study due to information from the 24/7 EEG SubQ Solution

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactEren Dursun
eren.dursun@kcl.ac.uk+44 (0)20 7836 5454
Backup ContactMark P Richardson
mark.richardson@kcl.ac.uk+44 (0)20 7836 5454

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026