Skip to content

Clinical Performance Evaluation of AI-Enabled Automated Gram Staining Device

Clinical Performance Evaluation of AI-Enabled Automated Gram Staining Device

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06143657
Enrollment
1600
Registered
2023-11-22
Start date
2024-01-10
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2023-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infection, Bacterial

Brief summary

The investigators have developed an analysis AI for Gram staining. In this study, the investigators will compare the testing accuracy of automated Gram staining equipment with AI with the testing accuracy of laboratory technicians. Based on the results, the investigators will examine the possibility of clinical application of the automated Gram staining device.

Detailed description

Gram staining,whitch provides crucial information for selecting antibiotics in the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases, is often manually performed in many laboratories, and the microscopic findings are subjectively interpreted and reported based on the experience of laboratory technicians. Automating the entire process from staining to microscopic examination, as achieved by the AI-equipped automatic Gram staining device, can reduce the labor required for Gram staining. This automation enables even less experienced technicians to quickly report Gram staining results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Auto microscopic examination of Gram-stained samples using anonymized processed slides created from clinical specimens. This evaluation will be compared with the accuracy of microscopic examinations performed by hospital laboratory technicians. If the accuracy of the machine is demonstrated, it can be registered as a medical device and proceed to the implementation stage in actual clinical settings. The implementation of this device in clinical laboratories is expected to reduce workload, expedite processes, and contribute to the optimization of antibiotic use based on Gram staining results.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAutomated Gram Staining Machine analysis

Measure urine and sputum specimens using this device.

Sponsors

GramEye
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\. Patients in whom a Gram stain test was ordered

Exclusion criteria

No

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary OutcomeDay 1The difference in accuracy rates between the Gram staining examination performed by laboratory technicians and the automated Gram staining device, including the approximate bacterial quantity based on Gram staining and morphology (categorized as -, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+), presence of white blood cells, presence of phagocytic images, and, in the case of sputum, the Geckler classification.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary OutcomeDay 1Impact of specimen type and identified bacterial species on testing accuracy.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exploratory evaluation itemsDay 1The difference in accuracy rates of microscopic examination findings by technicians at each facility based on the technicians' years of experience.

Contacts

Primary ContactYamada Tatsuya, M.D.
tatsuya.yamada@grameye.com7028060149

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026