Skip to content

The Impact of Different Scanning Methods and Reconstruction Algorithms on CT Image Quality

The Impact of Different Scanning Methods and Reconstruction Algorithms on CT Image Quality

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06142539
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-11-21
Start date
2024-03-13
Completion date
2025-05-31
Last updated
2024-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CT Examination of the Abdomen

Brief summary

Purpose: To evaluate the image quality of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in unenhanced abdominal low-dose CT (LDCT). Methods: CT images of a phantom were reconstructed with Hybrid iterative reconstruction and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and task transfer function (TTF) were measured. Two patient groups were included in this study: consecutive patients who underwent unenhanced abdominal standard-dose CT reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (SDCT group) and consecutive patients who underwent unenhanced abdominal LDCT reconstructed of HIR and DLIR (LDCT group). The CT values, standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the hepatic parenchyma and paraspinal muscle and abdominal subcutaneous fat were evaluated. Radiologists assessed the subjective image quality and lesion diagnostic confidence using a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared between SDCT and LDCT groups.

Interventions

RADIATIONCT Radiation Doses

Obtaining Low CT Radiation Doses by Adjusting Dose Levels

Sponsors

Wei Li
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Abdominal CT examination

Exclusion criteria

pregnancy and lactation for women unstable breath holding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Results of phantom researchup to six monthsCompare the changes in spatial resolution (TTF curve) and noise (NPS curve) between different algorithms
Results of human clinical studyup to six monthsGeneral information of clinical trial personnel Compare the general information of two groups of subjects, such as age, weight(kg), height(m), gender, and BMI (kg/m2). Quantitative image analysis The standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the hepatic parenchyma and paraspinal muscle were evaluated. Qualitative image analysis Two radiologists qualitatively assessed the overall image noise and overall image quality depiction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient demographicsup to six monthsParticipant demographics: Age (year)/Gender/Body weight (kg) / Body mass index (kg/m2)

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contact((Wei Li[Author])
lwqfsh@126.com13869190655
Backup ContactHui Qi
1604158620@qq.com13210607228

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026