Cancer, Malnutrition, Nutritional Intervention
Conditions
Keywords
Nutritional interventions, Dietetics, Cancer, Malnutrition, Nutrition
Brief summary
The goal of this intervention study is to study the effect of nutritional interventions in patients with cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy. The main question it aims to answer is: Does early nutritional interventions affect body weight, quality of life, survival, muscle mass, performance status, physical function, nutritional risk and treatment tolerance in patients with cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy? Researchers will compare patients receiving the intervention to a historical control cohort following current clinical practice.
Detailed description
Background 30-50% of patients with cancer are malnourished, resulting in poorer prognosis, increased toxicities, reduced quality of life, and reduced physical function. Nevertheless, cancer-related malnutrition remains largely unrecognized and undertreated in clinical practice. Aim To examine the effect of an early individualised nutritional intervention on body weight, quality of life, survival, muscle mass, performance status, physical function, nutritional risk, and treatment tolerance in patients with cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy. Methods An intervention study with a historical control cohort. Participants are newly diagnosed patients with lung, pancreatic, ovarian, or colorectal cancers recruited at initiation of palliative chemotherapy. The control group followed current clinical practice. The intervention group receives an individualised nutritional intervention delivered by a clinical dietitian from treatment initiation and throughout the treatment trajectory. The intervention is tailored to the participant's nutritional needs, food preferences, nutrition impact symptoms, and smell- and taste disorders. The primary endpoint is change in body weight. Secondary endpoints include quality of life, survival, muscle mass, performance status, physical function, nutritional risk, and treatment tolerance. Data are collected at baseline and after 12 and 24 weeks. Perspectives The project will provide new knowledge on the effects of individualised nutritional interventions for patients with cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy, and the potential to improve quality of life, treatment tolerance, and survival.
Interventions
OTHERNutritional intervention
An individualised nutritional intervention delivered by a clinical dietitian from initiation of palliative chemotherapy and throughout the 24-week study period. The intervention is tailored to each participant's nutritional requirements, nutritional status, food preferences, nutrition impact symptoms, and smell and taste alterations.
Sponsors
Gødstrup Hospital
Danish Cancer Society
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Intervention with a historical control cohort.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* patients who are newly diagnosed with lung, colorectal, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer. * patients treated with first-line palliative chemotherapy * patients who are able to read, write and speak Danish * patients ≥18 years of age * patients who are cognitive well-functioning
Exclusion criteria
* Significant cognitive impairment (e.g. dementia) compromising the ability to provide informed consent or participate meaningfully in the intervention * Lack of access to electronic mail * Inability to comply with the study protocol due to medical, psychosocial or practical factors
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Body weight | baseline, week 12 (±2 weeks), week 24 (±2 weeks) | Change in body weight in kilogram |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self reported Quality of life | baseline, week 12 (±2 weeks), week 24 (±2 weeks) | Measured by the questionnaire European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG) Core Questionnaire: Quality of Life (QLQ) Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4 for questions regarding function and symptoms, where a high score corresponds to a worse outcome, and a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7 for questions regarding Global Health Status and Quality of Life, where a high score corresponds to a better outcome. |
| Nutritional status | baseline, week 12 (±2 weeks), week 24 (±2 weeks) | Nutritional status will be assessed using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF), which evaluates weight history, food intake, nutrition impact symptoms, and activity and function. Total scores range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating poorer nutritional status and a greater need for nutritional intervention. |
| Nutritional Risk | baseline, week 12 (±2 weeks), week 24 (±2 weeks) | To assess the nutritional risk, the patient will be screened by Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002). This tool calculates a score based on information about Body Mass Index, weight loss, nutritional intake, severity of disease, and age. Results can be between 0 and 7, where a high score corresponds to a worse outcome |
| Survival | one year after initiation | one-year survival will be assessed in the electronic patient journal |
| Muscle mass | baseline and week 24 (±2 weeks) | CT scans to measure paraspinal muscle mass at the level of lumbal spine 3 (L3) which will also be assessed using measurements from the bio impedance scale |
| Performance status | baseline, week 12 (±2 weeks), week 24 (±2 weeks) | Patient's performance status will be assessed by the treating physician according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) classification on a scale ranging from 0 to 5, where a high score corresponds to a worse outcome |
| Hand grip strength | baseline, week 12 (±2 weeks), week 24 (±2 weeks) | The Hand grip strength as a measure of physical function will be estimated. Hand grip strength will be measured using a hand dynamometer ("CAMRY" Digital Hand Dynamometer). The hand grip strength will be measured three times in the dominant hand, and the highest value in kilogram is registered. |
| Timed up and go | baseline, week 12 (±2 weeks), week 24 (±2 weeks) | Timed up and go, as a measure om physical function, will be performed in the hallway from a chair with armrest. The patient is asked to walk three meters to a marked spot on the floor, return and sit down as quickly as possible without running. The test is performed twice, and the quickest time measurement is registered. The result is registered in seconds. |
| Chemotherapy | week 12 (±2 weeks), week 24 (±2 weeks) | As a measure of treatment tolerance, any change in chemotherapy drug will be registered |
| Dose intensity | baseline, week 12 (±2 weeks), week 24 (±2 weeks) | As a measure of treatment tolerance, dose intensity is registered on a scale ranging from 0 to -2, where 0 corresponds to a better outcome |
| Duration of chemotherapy | week 24 (±2 weeks) | As a measure of treatment tolerance, the duration of treatment with chemotherapy will be registered in days |
| Interruption, postponement or termination of chemotherapy | week 12 (±2 weeks), week 24 (±2 weeks) | As a measure of treatment tolerance, the number of interruptions and postponements and the number of participants with termination of chemotherapy will be registered. |
Countries
Denmark
Contacts
STUDY_DIRECTORTherese Ovesen, Prof
University Clinic for Flavour, Balance and Sleep
Outcome results
None listed