Aphasia
Conditions
Brief summary
The present study aims to characterize and modulate motor imagery abilities in individuals with aphantasia. The investigators will characterize the neurophysiological and physiological underpinnings of mental imagery abilities in participants with aphantasia by investigating several indices of motor imagery abilities and comparing them to participants with typical mental imagery abilities. The investigators will investigate whether non-invasive brain stimulation applied to the primary motor cortex improves mental imagery abilities in participants with aphantasia.
Detailed description
The investigators will recruit 20 participants with aphantasia and 20 participants with typical mental imagery capacities (no-aphantasia groups). Participants in both groups will complete a 3-hour visit for inclusion and baseline measurements (Visit 1) which will include neurophysiological, autonomic nervous system, cognitive and behavioral measures. Participants in the aphantasia group will complete 2 additional visits to receive active and sham tDCS sessions (Visit 2 and 3), according to a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover design. Mental training will be done concurrently with tDCS using a sequential finger tapping-task (Truong et al., 2022). Participants will receive the instructions of trying to imagine themselves performing the motor task, by feeling their fingers moving as if they were actually moving it (kinesthetic modality of motor imagery). Visits will be separated by at least 7 days.
Interventions
Participants will receive a session of active HD-tDCS at a current intensity of 4 mA for a duration of 15min. The placement of electrodes will be determined to specifically target the primary motor cortex (4 x 1 montage with the anode over C4). During the stimulation, participants will be engaged in a mental training task (sequential finger tapping-task).
Participants will receive a session of sham HD-tDCS, which will be delivered following the same procedures as active HD-tDCS but the intensity of the current will be set at 4mA during the 30 first seconds at the beginning of the 15-min period of the stimulation, and equal to 0 mA for the reminding period of stimulation to simulate the tingling sensation often experienced by individuals during active stimulation. The placement of electrodes will be determined to specifically target the primary motor cortex (4 x 1 montage with the anode over C4). During the stimulation, participants will be engaged in a mental training task (sequential finger tapping-task).
Sponsors
Hôpital le Vinatier
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Participants and experimenters (including tDCS operator) will not be informed about the nature (active or placebo) of the stimulation they will receive
Intervention model description
Single-center prospective randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study with two conditions: active tDCS + mental training and sham tDCS + mental training. A control group (participants with typical mental imagery abilities) will also be included for comparison at baseline.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* For the aphantasia group only: congenital aphantasia defined as a life-long inability to generate mental imagery (confirmed by a total score of 32 or less on the VVIQ, which is the gold standard questionnaire for aphantasia) * For the no-aphantasia group only: typical mental imagery capacities (confirmed by a total score of more than 32 on the VVIQ) * Covered by public health insurance * Understanding the French language * Signed written informed consent after being informed about the study
Exclusion criteria
* Presence or history of a somatic, neurologic, or mental illness * Actual pain or musculoskeletal disorders at the upper limb * Having a regular musical activity (more than once a week) because of high manual dexterity * Contraindication for noninvasive brain stimulation including the presence of ferromagnetic or magnetic sensitive metal objects implanted in the head or in close proximity (e.g., brain stent, clip, cochlear implants, or stimulator) * Pregnancy (controlled by urine pregnancy test in females without reported contraception) * Active seizure disorder or history of seizures * Participants under curatorship/guardianship
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Gains in motor performance following mental training | 2 times: immediately before tDCS (baseline) and immediately after tDCS | Gains in motor performance following mental training combined with tDCS will be measured using a sequential finger tapping-task. Gains following training will be expressed as a percentage of the baseline performance. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implicit motor imagery capacities | 1 time at baseline, in both groups | Implicit motor imagery capacities will be measured using a hand laterality judgment task . The percentage of correct response at the task will be calculated (range 0-100%). |
| Motor corticospinal excitability at rest and during kinesthetic motor imagery | 1 time at baseline (Visit 1), in both groups | Motor corticospinal excitability will be assessed with single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the primary motor cortex representation of the non-dominant hand. Using electromyography, we will measure the peak-to-peak mean amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs, measured in mV) in the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle both at rest and during kinesthetic motor imagery. |
| Heart rate variability | through study completion, an average of 1 month | Heart rate variability, including respiratory sinus arrhythmia measures, expressed in milliseconds (ms), will be assessed at rest and during kinesthetic motor imagery by recording the heart rate using three electrodes placed in the left chest area. These electrodes will be connected to the Biopac MP150 system and monitored with the Acqknowledge software |
| Source monitoring performance | 1 time at baseline, in both groups | Source monitoring performance will be evaluated using a specific source monitoring task . Source-monitoring accuracy scores (range 0-100) will be calculated as proportions of accurate source attributions for each source |
| Mental imagery abilities | 1 time at baseline, in both groups | Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ; range 16-80) |
| Performance of time-to-contact estimation | 1 time at baseline, in both groups | Performance will be measured using a specific time-to-contact (TTC) task. A TTC task involves temporal prediction in that the task requires a participant to predict the moment at which an event will occur given past sensory information (e.g., an auditory stimuli). The estimation of TTC requires determining the moment of contact (TTCa). The analysis of performance is based on BIAS quantification, which measures the average difference between individual estimation and TTCa |
| Skin conductance | through study completion, an average of 1 month | Amplitude of electrodermal response will be measured at rest, during actual movements and during kinesthetic motor imagery using the Biopac MP150 system with the Acqknowledge software. The ratio between amplitudes during imagined/actual movements will be computed (expressed in percent). |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactLydie SARTELET
Outcome results
None listed