Skip to content

Effects of Self-Efficacy Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMA) App

Effects of Self-Efficacy Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMA) App

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06140498
Acronym
EMA
Enrollment
93
Registered
2023-11-20
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2023-03-30
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Self Efficacy

Brief summary

This SeApp study aims to test a self-efficacy Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) in healthy students in the context of COVID-19. EMIs are mostly smartphone-based applications that deliver interventions to people while being engaged in their daily life activities. The app harnesses the power of self-efficacy autobiographical memories (e.g. problem-solving memories, memories of success). Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMAs) are also incorporated into the study to capture individuals' feelings, affect, and behavior in real time. Clarification added \[September 2025\]: The record previously showed an incorrect estimated enrollment due to a data entry error. The planned enrollment for this trial was 93, consistent with comparable prior studies, and enrollment was closed when 93 participants had been enrolled.

Detailed description

This SeApp study aims to test a self-efficacy Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) in healthy students in the context of COVID-19. EMIs are mostly smartphone-based applications that deliver interventions to people while being engaged in their daily life activities. The app harnesses the power of self-efficacy autobiographical memories (e.g. problem-solving memories, memories of success). Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMAs) are also incorporated into the study to capture individuals' feelings, affect, and behavior in real time. Developed by psychologist Dr. Albert Bandura in 1977, the concept of self-efficacy refers to an individual's belief in their ability to perform the necessary actions to manage particular situations. Bandura's theory highlights four major components of self-efficacy, including mastery experiences, socialmodeling, social persuasion, and psychological responses. The app tested here focuses on mastery experiences, which are what individuals gain when they take on a challenge and succeed. The app prompts participants in the daily recall of self-efficacy memories. The project aims to test its feasibility and to investigate how daily self-efficacy and motivation can be enhanced and perceived stress and depression reduced by daily memory-based training via smartphone app.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSelf-Efficacy Training and Ecological Momentary Assessment

Participants receive 3 self-efficacy trainings per day, combined with Ecological Momentary Assessments assessing mood, social contacts, and virtual context 3x/day for one week

BEHAVIORALControl intervention: Ecological Momentary Assessment only

Participants receive Ecological Momentary Assessments assessing mood, social contacts, and virtual context 3x/day for one week only

Sponsors

University of Zurich
CollaboratorOTHER
The New School
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Parallel Assignment

Intervention model description

Random Allocation, 2 Arms allocation to groups blinded, parallel assignment, masking participant, outcome assessor, investigator.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 61 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Value on Perceived Stress Scale ≥ 13 2. Student 3. Owner of a smartphone

Exclusion criteria

1\. Psychiatric history \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
General Self-Efficacyafter app completion and 1 month after app completionchange in general self-efficacy meeasured using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE, 10 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-efficacy; min=10, max=40)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intolerance of Uncertaintyafter app completion and 1 month after app completionchange in intolerance of uncertainty measured using the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS; 12 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater intolerance of uncertainty; min=12, max=60)
Perceived Stressafter app completion and 1 month after app completionchange in perceived stress measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; 10 items rated on a 0-4 scale with higher scores indicating greater levels of perceived stress; min=0, max=40)
State and Trait Anxietyafter app completion and 1 month after app completionchange in state and trait anxiety measured using the The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; 40 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale with a commonly used cutoff score of 40 indicating probable clinical levels of anxiety; min=20, max=80 on the subscales)
Positive and Negative Affect positive and negative affectafter app completion and 1 month after app completionchange in positive and negative affect measured using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS; 20 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale with 10 items measuring positive affect and 10 items measuring and higher scores indicating greater levels of positive or negative affect; min=10, max=50 on the subscales)
Hopelessnessafter app completion and 1 month after app completionchange in hopelessness measured using the BHS
Depressionafter app completion and 1 month after app completionchange in depression measured using the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BDI-II; 20 true and false items with higher scores indicating greater levels of hopelessness)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction with Mobile Applicationsingle time point: immediately after the interventionto evaluate usage of app using the User version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS; consists of 20 itesm, scores ranges from 1 to 5; the total score could range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating a higher overall quality rating for the app)
Coronavirus Anxiety Scaleafter app completion and 1 month after app completionto evaluate association with coronoavirus anxiety the coronavirus anxiety scale is used (10 items, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, the total score could range from 0 to 40)
Self-efficacy memoriessingle time point: baselineexploratory (descriptive) analysis, using no scale
Hopeafter app completion and 1 month after app completionchange in hope measured using the Adult Hope Scale (AHS; consists of 12 items, and respondents are required to rate each item on an 8-point Likert scale; min=12, max=96)
Ecological Momentary Assessmentthrough app participation (1 week)change of momentary mood

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026