Skip to content

Exploring the Relationship Between ICOPE Framework and Frailty Among Community-dwelling Elderly Individuals

Exploring the Relationship Between the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) Framework and Frailty Among Community-dwelling Elderly Individuals

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06140212
Enrollment
135
Registered
2023-11-18
Start date
2023-12-02
Completion date
2024-06-25
Last updated
2024-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Community-dwelling Elderly

Keywords

Frailty, ICOPE, Intrinsic capacity, Community-dwelling elderly

Brief summary

This study aims to (1) compare the assessment outcome of the ICOPE-I and ICOPE-S, and (2) investigate the correlation between both versions of the ICOPE step 1 screening tools and frailty in Taiwan.

Detailed description

The prevalence of frailty among the elderly increases annually as the population ages. The World Health Organization (WHO) has introduced the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework, which aims to support healthy aging by evaluating the intrinsic capacity (IC) of the elderly in six different areas. In Taiwan, two versions of the ICOPE step 1 screening tools are available: an interview-based version (ICOPE-I) and a self-administered version (ICOPE-S) based on the WHO's model. There are two main models for frailty status assessments: Dr. Fried's phenotype of frailty and Dr. Rockwood's accumulation of deficit models. A comparative study is necessary to assess the consistency of both versions of ICOPE in Taiwan and their associations with frailty.

Interventions

MoCA would be used to assess participants cognitive functioning.

BEHAVIORALChinese ICOPE screening tool (self-administration and interview versions)

The ICOPE screening tool would be used to assess participants health status, including cognitive decline, auditory and visual capabilities, mobility restrictions, nutritional status, and depressive symptoms.

BEHAVIORALFrailty status assessment (Edmonton frail scale and Frailty criteria by Dr. Fried)

The Edmonton frail scale and Frailty criteria by Dr. Fried would be used to assess participants frailty status.

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 65 years old * Community-dwelling elderly * Walking independently (with/without assistive devices)

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with a MoCA score \< 26 * Being unable to give informed consent (e.g., aphasia, deafness, and blindness) * Being unable to finish all the physical and screening assessment assessments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intrinsic capacityThe ICOPE screening tool assessment would take about 10 minutesICOPE screening tool (self-administration and interview version) would be used to evaluate the intrinsic capacity(IC), including cognitive decline, auditory and visual capabilities, mobility restrictions, nutritional status, and depressive symptoms) of the participants. Each question requires a binary response, either 'yes' or 'no'. A total score will be determined by summing the number of IC impairments, which have a score range of 0-6, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of impairment.
Phenotype of frailty statusThe phenotype of frailty status assessment would take about 10 minutesFrailty criteria by Dr. Fried would be used to evaluate the frail status of the participants.The Dr. Fried phenotype of frailty comprises five components, unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slowness, and low activity. Individuals who exhibit three or more indicators are classified as frail, those with one to two indicators are categorized as pre-frail, and those with no indicators are characterized as robust.
Accumulated frailty statusThe accumulated frailty status assessment would take about 10 minutesEdmonton frail scale(EFS) would be used to evaluate the frail status of the participants. EFS assesses a wide range of nine domains through 11 questions. These domains cover cognition, general health status, functional independence, social support, medication use, nutrition, mood, continence, and functional performance. The total score of EFS ranges from 0 to 17, where scores of 0-5 indicate not being frail, 6-7 indicate being vulnerable, 8-9 indicate mild frailty, 10-11 indicate moderate frailty and 12-17 indicate severe frailty.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive statusThe cognitive status assessment would take about 10 minutesMoCA would be used to evaluate the cognitive functioning of the participants. MOCA comprises attention and concentration, executive function, memory, language ability, visuospatial construction, abstract concepts, calculation, and orientation. The cumulative score amounts to 30 points, with a minimum standard of 26 points or higher. 25-18 points indicate mild cognitive impairment, 17-10 points indicate moderate cognitive impairment, fewer than 10 points indicate severe cognitive impairment.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026