Skip to content

Home-Based Palliative Care Impact on Providers

Investigating the Impact of Person-Centered Home-Based Palliative Care on Providers

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06140004
Enrollment
24
Registered
2023-11-18
Start date
2016-09-15
Completion date
2020-10-31
Last updated
2023-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Personnel, Palliative Care

Keywords

Home-based palliative care, Healthcare providers, Qualitative methods

Brief summary

This research challenges our current approach to fee-for-service palliative care and is significant because it will advance the fields of palliative and person-centered care, clinical practice, public policy, and health care financing. However, the most important effect will be on seriously ill patients and their families through increased access to palliative care outside of hospitals, enhanced palliative continuity across health settings, and improved affordability via reformed payment structures. Nation-wide replication of reimbursable HBCP models is anticipated.

Detailed description

This study will undertake an effort to address the two-pronged gap in providing palliative care in the U.S. (episodic care and misaligned financing structures). This will be done by implementing an evidence-based Home-Based Palliative Care (HBPC) model-originally developed in managed care-into primary fee-for-service as a covered health benefit; the very first translation of this model by a private health insurer in the U.S. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the provider and organizational-level impact of implementing reimbursable HBPC in primary care with the goal of characterizing a set of implementation strategies and eliciting key mechanisms on how to widely replicate person-centered, reimbursable HBPC in primary care settings across the country. To this end, seven research questions will be answered that address the study purpose pertaining to feasibility, barriers, facilitators, person-centeredness, and job satisfaction. This study is guided by the Diffusion of Innovations theory. The investigators will conduct primary collection and analysis of qualitative focus group data at each study site. Key outcomes for the qualitative component include feasibility, barriers, and facilitators of translating HBPC, as well as characteristics associated with rate of HBPC diffusion and implementation strategies. This project challenges our current approach to fee-for-service palliative care and seeks to shift current research. Nation-wide replication of reimbursable HBCP models is anticipated.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Southern California
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

• Current member of the Home-Based Palliative Care (HBPC) team or organization's leadership team

Exclusion criteria

* No interaction with palliative care patients or palliative care arm of organization * Unable to speak and read English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Confidence in Team12-monthsSelf-reported rating of confidence in HBPC team to implement the intervention as stated, on a scale of 1-10 (1=not confident at all; 10=extremely confident)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Confidence in Self12-monthsSelf-reported rating of confidence in self to implement the intervention as stated, on a scale of 1-10 (1=not confident at all; 10=extremely confident)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026