Skip to content

Comparing the Effect of siSPARC Microneedle Patch Versus siSPARC+siLR4A Microneedle Patch on Post-surgical Scars

Randomized Intra-individually Controlled Double-blinded Trial Comparing Effect of Small Interfering RNA Against SPARC (siSPARC) Microneedle Patch Versus Small Interfering RNA Against SPARC and IL4-RA (siSPARC + siLR4A) Microneedle Patch on Appearance of Post-surgical Scars

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06138964
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-11-18
Start date
2023-11-14
Completion date
2024-11-14
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keloid, Wound, Wound Heal

Brief summary

This randomized, double-blind controlled study aims to compare the effect on appearance of post- surgical scars between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patches. These are patches comprising short microneedles embedded with hydrolysed RNA (siRNAs).

Detailed description

This is an 8-week, single centre double-blinded intra-individually controlled trial to compare the effect of daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch on post-surgical scars. At least 50 subjects will be recruited for the study. After the patients have been screened for study eligibility by the study investigators or coordinators, the subjects who have understood and signed the informed consent will be enrolled in the study. Provided a subject satisfies all inclusion criteria and does not fall within exclusion criteria during the screening visit, that subject will be started on the trial during that same visit. Computer-generated randomisation will be performed to determine the randomization of patient population to the siSPARC microneedle patch or siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch. Subsequent follow-up visits would be on Day 30 and Day 60. A deviation of +/- 7 days will be accepted during the follow-up. Each study visit will last between 30-60 minutes. Study investigators and coordinators will be performing the following assessments: 1. High resolution 3D imaging: Scar elevation will be measured using the Space Spider 3D scanner, with a resolution of 0.1 mm and a blue light-emitting diode (LED) light source; 2. Vancouver scar scale (VSS) score; 3. Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale score from the photographs; 4. Change in patient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale; and 5. Assessment of side effects (if any). Photographic documentation: Photographic documentation will be performed at baseline and during the specified follow-up examinations. Images will be taken with standardized camera settings and standardized positioning of the subject. These images will be assessed by investigators to assess the change in scar appearance. The siRNA microneedle patches are not commercially available. These patches have undergone testing with guinea pigs and white rabbits and were ascertained as a 'non-sensitiser' and 'non- irritant', respectively. The patches have also underwent testing to L-929 cells which are adherent cells of mouse fibroblast cell line and found to be 'non-cytotoxic'. This study involves a trial comparing treatment outcomes; there is no investigative work conducted and hence no incidental findings are not anticipated.

Interventions

DRUGsiSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patches

siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch

DRUGsiSPARC microneedle patch

siSPARC microneedle patch

Sponsors

National Skin Centre
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult * Age 21-75 * 2 weeks (+/- 7 days) after surgical operation with incision into the dermis * Post-stitch removal when stitches were applied * Wound closure/union achieved

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating participant * Participants with wound infection * Participants assessed to be uncooperative or unable to self-administer the interventions * Participants with known contact allergy to ingredients in the patch formulation (comprising hyaluronic acid, siRNA and glue) and/or isopropyl alcohol * Participants who are unable to personally consent (for e.g., cognitively impaired)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of post-surgical scar elevation1 yearTo compare the efficacy in reducing post-surgical scar elevation between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch. This will be measured using high resolution 3D imaging: scar elevation will be measured using the Space Spider 3D scanner, with a resolution of 0.1 mm and a blue LED light source. The lower the elevation, the better the outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score1 yearTo evaluate the differences in VSS scores between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch or siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch. The total VSS score is based on 4 points: (1) vascularity (on a scale of 0 being normal to 3 being purple); (2) pigmentation (on a scale of 0 being normal, to 2 being hyperpigmentation); (3) pliability (on a scale of 0 being normal to 5 being contractures); and (4) height (on a scale of normal being flat to 3 being \>5mm). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Assessment of Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale1 yearAssessment of SCAR Scale performed on photographs. The SCAR Scale is based on 8 points: (1) scar spread (on a scale of 0 being none to near-invisible to 4 being severe); (2) erythema (on a scale of 0 being none to 3 being deep red or purple); (3) dyspigmentation (being either 0 absent or 1 present); (4) track or suture marks (being either 0 absent or 1 present); (5) hypertrophy or atrophy (on a scale of 0 being none to 3 being severe); (6) impression (being either 0 desirable or 1 undesirable); (7) patient reported itch in last 24 hours (being either 0 absent or 1 present); and (8) patient reported pain (being either 0 absent or 1 present). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Patient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale1 yearPatient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 (0 being no pain, and 10 being the worst pain). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Side effects1 yearPatient reported side effects (if any), such as contact dermatitis (if any).

Countries

Singapore

Contacts

Primary ContactHong Liang Tey
teyhongliang@ntu.edu.sg6350 6666
Backup ContactDelwyn Lim
delwynlim@Outlook.com6350 6666

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026