Skip to content

Comparison of Three Robotic Platforms for Hysterectomy

Comparative Evaluation of Three Surgical Robotic Platforms for the Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Procedure: Post Market Clinical Follow Up Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06138197
Acronym
COMPAR-HYST
Enrollment
150
Registered
2023-11-18
Start date
2024-01-04
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hysterectomy

Keywords

Hysterectomy, Gynecologic pathology, Robotic-assisted laparoscopy

Brief summary

Hysterectomy is the most common procedure in gynaecology after a cesarean section. In recent years, the laparoscopic approach has become preferred given the different advantages over the traditional laparotomic approach, and both conventional laparoscopy and robotic-assisted laparoscopy have become the standard approach for hysterectomy. To date, robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy has been performed using one robotic platform and only recently, two new robotic platforms have been introduced in clinical practice. Although all three are registered for human use and available for clinical practice, there are currently not enough clinical experiences and data in the literature to evaluate the efficacy, safety and relationship between cost and efficacy of the new platforms available for the robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. For this reason, the investigators will conduct an exploratory clinical study on a Post Market Clinical Follow up (PMCF) medical device aimed at performing a preliminary assessment of the global performance of the ITL procedure implemented using the three robotic platforms currently available.

Interventions

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy following usual surgical technique

Sponsors

Universita di Verona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy surgery * Age \> 18 years * Signature of the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing emergency surgery * Patients who are candidates for hysterectomy for a non-gynaecological indication * Patients undergoing previous radiation therapy * Patients unable to express adequate informed consent to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Textbook outcome satisfaction90 days after surgeryRobotic-assisted hysterectomy performed without laparotomy conversion, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2), the performance of postoperative imaging excluding transvaginal ultrasound, reoperation, length of stay after day of surgery \>2 days, readmission within 90 days, mortality, surgery length greater than 120 minutes, or intraoperative blood loss greater than 100mL. The Textbook outcome will be considered fulfilled if all conditions are met.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative complicationsDuring surgeryIntraoperative complications graded based on the Clavien-Dindo classification
Postoperative complications30 and 90 days after surgeryPostoperative complications graded based on the Clavien-Dindo classification
Operative timeDuring surgeryTime between first incision and skin closure
Intraoperative blood lossDuring surgeryTotal blood aspirate during the surgical procedure
Sexual function90 and 180 days after surgeryThe female sexual function index (FSFI) consists of 19 multiple-choice items that assess female sexual functioning based on 6 domains: desire, arousal, orgasm, pain, sexual satisfaction, and lubrication. The total score ranges from 0 to 36, with 26.55 as the cut-off suggesting the presence of sexual dysfunction. The higher the score, the better the sexual function.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 12, 2026