Skip to content

Digital Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Major Elective Surgery

Digital Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Major Elective Surgery: a Single-arm Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06137781
Enrollment
35
Registered
2023-11-18
Start date
2024-02-19
Completion date
2024-09-17
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery

Keywords

Prehabilitation, Exercise, Major surgery, Digital health

Brief summary

Prehabilitation describes the process of improving someone's functional capacity before major surgery. Prehabilitation commonly focuses on exercise training, as fitness level is a predictor of surgical outcomes - the fitter you are before surgery, the lower the risk of complications after surgery. Typically, exercise training is done at the hospital, but research shows that patients would prefer to do prehabilitation exercises in their home. The goal of this study is to test the feasibility of an online prehabilitation programme made by PreActiv, which can be accessed at home via a website by patients who are awaiting major surgery. PreActiv's prehabilitation programme is six weeks long, and involves three 35-minute exercise sessions per week, with each session including a warm-up, cardio exercises, muscle strengthening exercises, and breathing exercises. Information from this pilot study on the number of exercise sessions attended (adherence) and the number of patients who complete the study (retention) will be used to decide whether we should progress to a larger study that assesses the effectiveness of PreActiv's prehabilitation.

Detailed description

This is a single-arm pilot study to assess the feasibility of PreActiv's digital prehabilitation alongside usual care at the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust. The novel provision of tailored, progressive, dynamic, evidence-based, and home-based prehabilitation via PreActiv's digital platform requires evaluation for feasibility, prior to a larger, randomised-controlled trial assessing efficacy. Such research is warranted, as patients indicate a preference to complete prehabilitation at home, rather than at the hospital, but current home-based prehabilitation programmes are one-size-fits-all, and do not adapt to changes in fitness level. Patients awaiting major surgery and aged 50 years or older will be identified by preoperative nurses and screened by a member of the research team at the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust. Eligible patients who provide written informed consent will then be invited to attend a measurement visit at the University of Bath for baseline assessments of fitness, blood pressure, physical activity level, and wellbeing in week 0. All participants will then enrol onto PreActiv's website, and a six-week, thrice weekly prehabilitation programme will be created for them based on their mobility and fitness level. Measurements at the University of Bath will be repeated in week 7 to assess the preliminary efficacy of PreActiv's digital prehabilitation. Feasibility outcomes will be used to inform the design of a potential future randomised-controlled trial measuring change to cardiorespiratory fitness as the primary outcome. The decision to progress to a randomised-controlled trial will be based on pre-defined progression criteria for adherence and retention in this pilot study. In addition, participant feedback will be used to refine the study design and intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSix weeks of digital prehabilitation

All participants will be allocated to receive six weeks of digital prehabilitation via PreActiv's website, plus usual care.

Sponsors

University of Bath
CollaboratorOTHER
PreActiv
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Planned for major elective surgery ≥10 weeks from time of recruitment Major or complex surgery examples in NICE guideline NG45 'Routine preoperative tests for elective surgery' provides appropriate examples that are relevant to the patient cohort at the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust (RUH). We have extrapolated from these examples a list of surgical procedures that qualify as major or complex surgery and are carried out at the RUH. This list is not exhaustive but provides a range of procedures that are applicable for example: laparotomy, joint replacement, total abdominal hysterectomy, nephrectomy, neck dissection, parotidectomy, endoscopic resection of prostate, thyroidectomy. * Aged ≥50 years

Exclusion criteria

* Surgery scheduled in \<10 weeks * Any relative or absolute contraindications to undertake an exercise test as described by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM, 2022) and the American Heart Association (Fletcher et al., 2013) * Unsuitable to increase physical activity level as determined by Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) * Uncontrolled or poorly-controlled lung condition, diabetes, or seizures * Recent (\<12 months) cardiovascular events needing hospital admission * Ongoing infection or wound making this programme hazardous for the patient * Unable to access technology required to use the PreActiv digital platform * Currently meeting World Health Organisation (WHO) physical activity guidelines of 75- 300 minutes of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity per week, plus twice-weekly muscle strengthening activities * Unable to understand explanations and/or provide informed consent * Unable to understand written or spoken English, and without ongoing access to an interpreter * Any condition and/or behaviour that would pose undue personal risk or introduce bias into the study * Currently enrolled in another research trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Retained6 weeksThe number of patients that enrol into the study who complete follow-up measurements, with percentage calculated
Number of Participants Recruited4 monthsThe number of patients invited that provide written informed consent, with percentage calculated
Number of Participants Interested in Participating4 monthsThe number of patients invited that are willing to be screened for eligibility, with percentage calculated
Number of Participants That Passed Screening4 monthsThe number of willing patients that pass screening for eligibility, with percentage calculated
Number of Adherent Participants6 weeksThe number of participants who complete all exercise sessions, with percentage calculated
Percentage of Compliant Exercise Sessions6 weeksThe percentage of exercise sessions that are completed as prescribed in terms of intensity, duration, and type of exercise

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life EQ-5D Visual Analogue ScaleChange from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)Assessed via EuroQol EQ-5D visual analogue scale, with a highest possible score of 100 and a lowest possible score of 0. A higher score is favourable as it indicates better quality of life.
1-minute Sit-to-stand TestChange from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7).Assessed via the number of repetitions completed during a 1-minute sit-to-stand test.
Cardiorespiratory FitnessChange from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)Assessed via a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test performed on a cycle ergometer, with measurements of VO2peak (ml/kg/min) and ventilatory threshold (ml/kg/min) derived.
Resting Blood PressureChange from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)Three measurements were made after 15 minutes seated rest using an automated sphygmomanometer, with the average (mean) of the three measurements reported (mmHg)
Resting Heart RateChange from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)Three measurements were made after 15 minutes seated rest using an automated sphygmomanometer, with the average (mean) of the three measurements reported (bpm)
Physical Activity LevelChange from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)Assessed via International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short-form. After data processing, the highest possible score is 25,704 MET-minutes/week and the lowest possible score is 0 MET-minutes/week. A higher score is favourable as it indicates a higher physical activity level.
Anxiety and DepressionChange from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)Assessed via Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The highest possible score is 21 and the lowest possible score is 0 for both the anxiety and depression sub-scores. A lower score is favourable as it indicates lower anxiety/depression.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Carbon Emissions Avoided With Home-based vs. Face-to-face Prehabilitation6 weeksAn estimation of the carbon emissions avoided by performing prehabilitation at home via PreActiv's digital prehabilitation compared to the estimated hypothetical emissions associated with participants travelling to the hospital three times per week for six weeks for face-to-face prehabilitation. Publicly-available carbon emissions data will be used for calculations.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was completed between 19th February 2024 and 19th June 2024. Recruitment took place within the preoperative assessment clinic at the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Six Weeks of Digital Prehabilitation
The digital prehabilitation programme comprises three 35-minute exercise sessions per week, including a warm-up, vigorous intensity aerobic and resistance exercises, and breathing exercises. The digital prehabilitation programme will be tailored to the participant's mobility level and fitness level, which will be assessed via in-platform questionnaires and functional assessments. Functional assessments will be repeated every two weeks to adapt the prehabilitation programme according to changes in fitness level. Within PreActiv's website, participants will be enrolled into a managed community forum of patients and healthcare professionals where they can post their achievements and questions. Alongside access to PreActiv's digital prehabilitation, patients will be given educational materials that summarise the benefits of prehabilitation and how to realise them.
24
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Baseline measurementsExpedited surgery1
Baseline measurementsLost to Follow-up2
Baseline measurementsWithdrawal by Subject1
Intervention periodAdverse Event1
Intervention periodExpedited surgery1
Intervention periodLost to Follow-up2
Intervention periodWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSix Weeks of Digital Prehabilitation
Age, Continuous69 Years
Body mass index29.1 kg/m2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White British
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants
Surgery type
Cholecystectomy
1 Participants
Surgery type
Hernia repair
3 Participants
Surgery type
Hip replacement
3 Participants
Surgery type
Hip revision
1 Participants
Surgery type
Hysterectomy
2 Participants
Surgery type
Knee replacement
3 Participants
Surgery type
Knee revision
1 Participants
Surgery type
Ovarian cystectomy
1 Participants
Surgery type
Parathyroidectomy
3 Participants
Surgery type
Prostatectomy
1 Participants
Surgery type
Thyroidectomy
2 Participants
Surgery type
Ureteral reimplantation
1 Participants
Surgery type
Vaginal prolapse repair
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Adherent Participants

The number of participants who complete all exercise sessions, with percentage calculated

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationNumber of Adherent Participants21 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Interested in Participating

The number of patients invited that are willing to be screened for eligibility, with percentage calculated

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationNumber of Participants Interested in Participating39 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Recruited

The number of patients invited that provide written informed consent, with percentage calculated

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationNumber of Participants Recruited35 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Retained

The number of patients that enrol into the study who complete follow-up measurements, with percentage calculated

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationNumber of Participants Retained24 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants That Passed Screening

The number of willing patients that pass screening for eligibility, with percentage calculated

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationNumber of Participants That Passed Screening35 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Compliant Exercise Sessions

The percentage of exercise sessions that are completed as prescribed in terms of intensity, duration, and type of exercise

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationPercentage of Compliant Exercise Sessions79 Percentage
Secondary

1-minute Sit-to-stand Test

Assessed via the number of repetitions completed during a 1-minute sit-to-stand test.

Time frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7).

Population: 19/24 participants completed 1-minute sit-to-stand testing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitation1-minute Sit-to-stand Test11 Repetitions
Secondary

Anxiety and Depression

Assessed via Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The highest possible score is 21 and the lowest possible score is 0 for both the anxiety and depression sub-scores. A lower score is favourable as it indicates lower anxiety/depression.

Time frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationAnxiety and DepressionAnxiety (pre-post change)-1 Points
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationAnxiety and DepressionDepression (pre-post change)-1 Points
Secondary

Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Assessed via a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test performed on a cycle ergometer, with measurements of VO2peak (ml/kg/min) and ventilatory threshold (ml/kg/min) derived.

Time frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)

Population: 21/24 participants completed cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationCardiorespiratory FitnessPeak oxygen uptake (pre-post change)0.3 ml/kg/min
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationCardiorespiratory FitnessVentilatory threshold (pre-post change)0.0 ml/kg/min
Secondary

Physical Activity Level

Assessed via International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short-form. After data processing, the highest possible score is 25,704 MET-minutes/week and the lowest possible score is 0 MET-minutes/week. A higher score is favourable as it indicates a higher physical activity level.

Time frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)

Population: 20/24 participants provided complete IPAQ-short form responses for calculation of total physical activity.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationPhysical Activity Level852 MET-minutes/week
Secondary

Quality of Life EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale

Assessed via EuroQol EQ-5D visual analogue scale, with a highest possible score of 100 and a lowest possible score of 0. A higher score is favourable as it indicates better quality of life.

Time frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationQuality of Life EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale5 Percentage
Secondary

Resting Blood Pressure

Three measurements were made after 15 minutes seated rest using an automated sphygmomanometer, with the average (mean) of the three measurements reported (mmHg)

Time frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationResting Blood PressureSystolic blood pressure (pre-post change)1 mmHg
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationResting Blood PressureDiastolic blood pressure (pre-post change)1 mmHg
Secondary

Resting Heart Rate

Three measurements were made after 15 minutes seated rest using an automated sphygmomanometer, with the average (mean) of the three measurements reported (bpm)

Time frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationResting Heart Rate-2 beats/minute
Other Pre-specified

Carbon Emissions Avoided With Home-based vs. Face-to-face Prehabilitation

An estimation of the carbon emissions avoided by performing prehabilitation at home via PreActiv's digital prehabilitation compared to the estimated hypothetical emissions associated with participants travelling to the hospital three times per week for six weeks for face-to-face prehabilitation. Publicly-available carbon emissions data will be used for calculations.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Six weeks of digital prehabilitationCarbon Emissions Avoided With Home-based vs. Face-to-face Prehabilitation44 Kilograms of carbon emissions avoided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026