Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Vixarelimab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

A Phase II, Multicenter Induction Study With an Active Treatment Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Vixarelimab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06137183
Enrollment
79
Registered
2023-11-18
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2025-06-16
Last updated
2026-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Gastrointestinal Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Colitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of vixarelimab compared with placebo in participants with moderate to severe UC who have demonstrated inadequate response to, loss of response to, or intolerance to prior conventional or advanced therapy.

Detailed description

This study consists of two periods: 1. An induction period which will test the induction of clinical remission; 2. An optional active treatment extension (ATE) period which will explore durability of clinical response and remission in which all participants will receive vixarelimab.

Interventions

Vixarelimab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arms.

DRUGPlacebo

Vixarelimab matching placebo will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arms.

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of UC for at least 3 months * Moderately to severely active UC, assessed by mMS * Inadequate response, loss of response to, or intolerance to conventional or advanced therapies for UC

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis * Suspicion of ischemic, radiation, microscopic, or infectious colitis * Prior colectomy * Inadequate response or loss of response to previous treatment of UC with tofacitinib, upadacitinib, or other systemic janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12At Week 12Clinical remission was defined as modified Mayo Score (mMS) of ≤ 2, including stool frequency subscore ≤ 1, rectal bleeding subscore=0, \& endoscopy subscore ≤ 1 (score of 1 modified to exclude friability). MMS is a composite of 3 Mayo Score assessments, each scored on a scale from 0-3. The total score ranges from 0-9, with higher scores indicating more severe disease: stool frequency (0=Normal number of stools, 1=1-2 more stools than normal, 2=3-4 more stools than normal, 3=5 or more stools than normal); rectal bleeding (0=No blood seen or no bowel movement, 1=Stool with streaks of blood, 2=Stool with more than streaks of blood, 3=Blood alone passed); centrally read endoscopy (0=Normal appearance of mucosa, 1=Mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern\], 2=Moderate disease \[marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions\], 3=Severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]). Percentages have been rounded off.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12At Week 12Clinical response was defined as decrease from baseline in mMS of ≥ 2 \& ≥ 30% reduction from baseline and also decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1. MMS is a composite of 3 Mayo Score assessments, each scored on a scale from 0-3. The total score ranges from 0-9, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Rectal bleeding scores are: 0=No blood seen or no bowel movement, 1=Stool with streaks of blood, 2=Stool with more than streaks of blood, 3=Blood alone passed. Percentages have been rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12At Week 12Endoscopic improvement was defined as a Mayo endoscopy subscore of ≤ 1 (score of 1 modified to exclude friability). Endoscopy scores were based on interpretation by a blinded central reader. The Mayo Score consists of participant-reported outcomes (stool frequency, rectal bleeding), endoscopy, and clinician-reported outcome (Physician's Global Assessment) components. The Mayo endoscopy sub-score ranges from 0 to 3 (0= No inflammation; 1= Mild inflammation \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern\]; 2=Moderate inflammation \[marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, and friability\]; 3= Severe inflammation \[ulceration and spontaneous bleeding\]), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Percentages have been rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 12At Week 12Endoscopic remission was defined as a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0. Endoscopy scores were based on interpretation by a blinded central reader. The Mayo Score consists of participant-reported outcomes (stool frequency, rectal bleeding), endoscopy, and clinician-reported outcome (Physician's Global Assessment) components. The Mayo endoscopy sub-score ranges from 0 to 3 (0= No inflammation; 1= Mild inflammation \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern and mild friability\]; 2=Moderate inflammation \[marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, and friability\]; 3= Severe inflammation \[ulceration and spontaneous bleeding\]), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Percentages have been rounded off.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Induction period: From treatment initiation up to 10 weeks follow-up after the final dose (up to 22 weeks); ATE period: From treatment initiation up to 10 weeks follow-up after the final dose (up to 56 weeks)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any of the following: Any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product; Any new disease or exacerbation of existing disease; Recurrence of an intermittent medical condition not present at baseline; Any deterioration in a laboratory value or other clinical test, associated with symptoms or leads to change in study treatment or concomitant treatment or discontinuation from study treatment; AEs related to a protocol-mandated intervention, including those that occur prior to assignment of study treatment.
Serum Concentration of Vixarelimab at Specified TimepointsWeeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and study completion/early termination (up to 22 weeks)
Induction: Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Baseline and post-baseline visits (up to 12 weeks)Participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). The total number of participants who developed ADAs to vixarelimab was determined by summing the ADA-positive participants across all timepoints.

Countries

Brazil, China, Czechia, France, Greece, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Serbia, South Korea, Taiwan, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORClinical Trial

Genentech, Inc.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 79 participants with active moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) took part in the study at 43 centers across 12 countries from 1 May 2024 to 16 June 2025.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to 3 cohorts & received Vixarelimab, every 2 weeks (Q2W); Vixarelimab, every 4 weeks (Q4W), or Placebo, Q2W. The study was divided into two periods: Induction period and an optional Active Treatment Extension (ATE) period. Participants who completed the induction period could optionally continue treatment in the ATE period.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 260 / 260 / 150 / 100 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 279 / 263 / 269 / 155 / 108 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 273 / 261 / 261 / 150 / 100 / 17

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026