Skip to content

PRevention of OsTEoporotiC FracTure 2 Pilot Study

The Application of Precise Education + Shared Decision-Making Program for the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures Based on Behavioral Theories: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06134908
Acronym
PROTECT-2
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-11-18
Start date
2024-01-13
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2024-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fragility Fracture

Keywords

Osteoporosis, Fragility Fracture, Shared Decision-Making, Education

Brief summary

With the aging of the world population, osteoporosis and fragility fractures have become global public health concerns. It has been estimated the population of people ≥60 years of age will increase from 229 million (16.2%) in 2017 to 479 million (35.1%) by 2050 in China. Because age is an important predictor of osteoporosis and fragility fracture, the incidence of fragility fracture has increased dramatically in China over the past decades. Timely treatment of osteoporosis is an effective way to decrease additional fracture risk among patients with fragility fractures, but anti-osteoporosis treatment rate is relatively low in China. Effective fracture prevention intervention is urgently needed in China. As a potential way to achieve effective risk communication, shared decision-making allows patients to be active participants in the management of osteoporosis. The investigators designed a multifaceted intervention, which was named as Precise Education + Shared Decision-Making program for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures based on behavioral theories, and assessed the effectiveness for fracture prevention using a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial among several hospitals in China. The aim of this pilot study is to test the acceptability and feasibility as well as preliminary efficacy of this program in patients with fragility fractures.

Interventions

The multicomponent intervention elements include education for clinicians and patients as well as a shared decision-making program among clinicians and patients. A shared decision-making booklet and a mobile application will be used to promote osteoporosis management and fracture practice.

Sponsors

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Longgang Orthopedics Hospital of Shenzhen
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The First People's Hospital of Hefei
CollaboratorOTHER
Dongguan Eighth People's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The Third People's Hospital of Longgang District Shenzhen
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Local residents (live in the city where the hospital is located for half a year or more); 2. Hospitalized patients with fractures aged 50 years and above; 3. First fracture, without history of fracture; 4. Never diagnosed as osteoporosis before admission; 5. No fracture history, and never receive any bone mineral density test, and never take anti-osteoporosis medication in the 4 years before admission; 6. Hospitalized patients with the following fractures: hip fracture, thoracic spine fracture, and lumbar spine fracture; 7. New fragility fracture: fracture that occurs after minor trauma or daily activities, such as a fracture caused by a fall from standing height or less; fracture happened within 6 weeks; 8. Not living in a nursing or rehabilitation institution before fracture; 9. Possess reading ability, and can read and understand informed consent forms or medical materials independently.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with pathological fractures caused by tumor or infection; 2. Patients with cognitive dysfunction or mental disorder; 3. AIDS patients; 4. Patients who refuse to follow-up, or have poor compliance for follow-up, or fail to understand and cooperate for follow-up; 5. Hearing or visual impairment, and unable to communicate or read materials; 6. Patients who have participate in other studies; 7. Other conditions that the investigator considered inappropriate to enroll.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trial feasibility - Recruitment3 monthsNumber or N (%) participants recruited within 3 months of trial initiation at each centre.
Trial feasibility - Acceptability of the multicomponent program component30 days after study recruitmentParticipants will be asked to evaluate the program with a questionnaire with questions about frequency, length, content, delivery, and duration of the booklet and the mobile application using a 5-point Likert scale.
Trial feasibility - Acceptability of the shared decision-making process7 days after study recruitmentBoth clinicians and patients will be asked to evaluate the shared decision-making process once they completed it. A survey will be administered to evaluate the content and comprehension of the program using a 5-point Likert scale.
Trial feasibility - Retention30 days after study recruitmentThe retention rates will be assessed as the 30-day follow-up rate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnosis, education, and follow-up practice of osteoporosis1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-upThe patients will be followed up with questionnaires about diagnosis, education, and follow-up of osteoporosis.
Refracture1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-upThe patients will be followed up and asked whether they have refracture.
Bone mineral density test3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-upThe patients will be followed up and asked whether they accept bone mineral density test.
Patients' knowledge and attitude about osteoporosis and fragility fracturebaseline; 1 month follow-up; 6 month follow-upPatients' knowledge and attitude about osteoporosis and fragility fracture will be evaluated with standardized questionnaires.
Survival1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-upThe patients will be followed up about their survival status.
Shared decision-making process7 days after study recruitmentStandardized questionnaires will be used to evaluated the shared decision-making process.
Anti-osteoporosis treatment rate1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-upThe patients will be followed up and asked whether they accept any anti-osteoporosis medication.
Adherence of anti-osteoporosis medication1 month follow-up; 3 month follow-up; 6 month follow-up; 12 month follow-up; 24 month follow-upAdherence of anti-osteoporosis medication will be assessed with medication possession ratio and self-reported question.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJian Mo, MD
mojian3@mail.sysu.edu.cn+86 (020) 85252900

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026