Endometrial Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Endometrial cancer, Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), Trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2)
Brief summary
Researchers are looking for new ways to treat people with endometrial cancer (EC) who have previously received treatment with platinum based therapy (a type of chemotherapy) and immunotherapy. Immunotherapy is a treatment that helps the immune system fight cancer. This clinical study will compare sacituzumab tirumotecan to chemotherapy. The goal of the study is to learn if people who receive sacituzumab tirumotecan live longer overall and without the cancer getting worse compared to people who receive chemotherapy.
Interventions
4 mg/kg of sacituzumab tirumotecan by IV infusion
60 mg/m\^2 of doxorubicin by IV Infusion
80 mg/m\^2 of paclitaxel by IV infusion
100 mg/m\^2 of nab-paclitaxel by IV infusion
Participants will receive the following rescue medications per approved product label before sacituzumab tirumotecan infusion: Histamine-1 (H1) receptor antagonist, histamine-2 (H2) receptor antagonist, acetaminophen or equivalent, dexamethasone or equivalent, and steroid mouthwash (dexamethasone or equivalent).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
The main inclusion and
Exclusion criteria
include but are not limited to the following: Inclusion Criteria: * Has a histologically-confirmed diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma or carcinosarcoma. * Has radiographically evaluable disease, either measurable or nonmeasurable per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1), as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). * Has received prior platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1)/anti- programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy, either separately or in combination.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) | Up to approximately 27 months | PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Up to approximately 48 months | OS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR | Up to approximately 27 months | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1. based on BICR. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR | Up to approximately 27 months | For participants who demonstrate confirmed CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR, DOR is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. |
| Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Adverse Events (AEs) | Up to approximately 48 months | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention whether or not considered related to the study intervention. |
| Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Intervention Due to an AE | Up to approximately 48 months | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention whether or not considered related to the study intervention. |
| Change from Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Score (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 [EORTC QLQ-C30]) | Baseline, up to approximately 48 months | The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall health status and quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions, "How would you rate your overall health during the past week (Item 29)?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week (Item 30)?" are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall health status and quality of life. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 combined score will be presented. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Puerto Rico, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States
Contacts
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC