Skip to content

Effects of HIIT on HRV in Sub-acute Post-stroke Patients

Effect of a High-intensity Interval-training on Heart Rate Variability Prognostic Parameters in Early Post-stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06132516
Acronym
E(AVC)
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-11-15
Start date
2024-03-15
Completion date
2027-09-30
Last updated
2025-12-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Acute post-stroke phase Rehabilitation, HIIT, Heart Rate Variability

Brief summary

Objective. To assess the effect of innovative High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) on Heart Rate Variability, a strong biomarker of positive outcome after stroke. Design. A randomized controlled study with blinded assessment of the main criteria. Population. NIHSS\<20 post-stroke patients, hospitalized in secondary care stroke-units within the first 3 months (sub-acute phase). Selection. Eligibility test on a semi-recumbent cycloergometer Intervention. In addition to a standard neurorehabilitation program (3±1 sessions daily, including cognitive and occupational therapy, physiotherapy with strengthening-stretching exercises), the aerobic group will benefit from a HIIT procedure (HIIT group) with a semi-recumbent cycloergometer, for 6 weeks representing 16 sessions; while the non-aerobic group will undertake a Low-Intensity Group-Gymnastic Training (Control or LIGT Group) (=segmental strengthening-stretching and proprioceptive exercises mainly), with the same training volume and frequency for both groups. Main outcome measure. Standard Deviation of Normal-to-Normal RR intervals (SDNN) from 24h Holter-ECG recordings at W4, W8 and M6. Modifications in patients' medical management are expected, as generalization of AT in moderate to severe stroke patients at the sub-acute phase, with Low volume HIIT and simple devices.

Detailed description

A randomized controlled 2-arms parallel study, comparing HRV in two groups of stroke patients. Post-acute stroke patients hospitalized in rehabilitation stroke¬-units, within secondary care hospitals, are screened for eligibility. * Inclusion criteria: * first-ever hemispheric stroke, with consistent clinical and neuroimaging signs * \<3 month * NIHSS \<20 in acute care * age\>18 * Non-inclusion criteria: * complicated diabetes mellitus with objective neuropathy and/or autonomic dysfunction * other concomitant cardiac or pulmonary diseases possibly affecting HRV recordings, ie: acute myocardial infarction (\<6 month), myocardial dysfunction as severe dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, class 3 and 4 heart failure, arrhythmias including chronic atrial fibrillation, conduction abnormalities. * beta-blockers with no alternative options * severe cognitive impairment inconsistent with free, informed and written consent or questionnaire filling * Patients will benefit beforehand from a symptom-limited Graded Exercise Test (GXT), with ECG monitoring and using a semi recumbent cycle ergometer (Ergoline, Optibike MED600), mainly to exclude a CV risk and to accurately assess their exercise capacities for better individualized programs. Peak oxygen uptake, Peak Power , Peak Heart Rate, Respiratory Exchange Ratio (VO2peak, Power peak, HRpeak, RER respectively) will be measured, Ventilatory Threshold 1 (VT1) will be estimated, and oxygen uptake, power and heart rate at VT1 will be recorded (VO2vt1, Pvt1, HRvt1). * The standard-of-care neuro-rehabilitation program was carried out according to the international recommendations. It will consist daily in a mean of 3 sessions (2 to 4), five days a week: physiotherapy (with, among others, Strengthening-Stretching activity), occupational therapy, cognitive therapy (orthophonist or neuro-psychologist). In addition, either aerobic training (HIIT) or non-aerobic training (Control Group-CG by Low Intensity Group Training-LIGT). * HIIT and LIGT training volume and duration will be the same (16 sessions, 12 to 30' each, 6 weeks). The intervention-group (HIIT Group) will realize a 6-weeks Aerobic Training as follows: Among the FITT principle: * Frequency: 2-3 times a week * Intensity: long-HIIT: 4 to 5 four-minutes intervals at Pvt1(+/- 2 steps) interspersed with two-minutes interval at 50% Pvt1=(4-5 x (4':2')/(Pvt1 :50%Pvt1)) * short-HIIT: 8 to 10 forty-five seconds intervals at Pmax (+/- 2 steps) interspersed with forty-five seconds rest intervals = (8-10x(45:45)/Pmax :Rest)) * Time: 12' to 30' per session (8 short-sessions of 12 to 15', 8 long-sessions of 24 to 30') * Type: cycling on a semirecumbent ergometer Depending on the patient's fatigue and progress, the intensity will be adjusted, with an HR target \>80% HRpeak during intervals. In the CG group, HIIT will be replaced by LIGT sessions, as follows: Among the FITT principle: * Frequency: 2-3 times a week * Intensity: Low HR controlled by HR monitoring (\<50% HRpeak or 30%HRR) * Time: 12' to 30' per session (8 short-sessions of 12 to 15', 8 long-sessions of 24 to 30') * Type: Static and Segmental strengthening and stretching mainly * Measures taken to reduce bias: -Patients' spontaneous physical activity will be monitored via two sets of four-day measurements, including weekends, using an Actigraph device worn on a belt. * The primary endpoint will always be measured over 24 hours, at the same time of week; it will be read blind by the same cardiologist (single-blind). * Known criteria for HRV modification will be monitored (side of the lesion, fever, blood pressure spike or hypoxia during measurement, medication intake). * The other criteria will always be measured during the same half-day. * In order to introduce a blind component for the patient (double-blind), the information provided to the patient will specify a comparison between two different types of physical activity * At M6, only the primary endpoint will be measured. A Marshall questionnaire will be used at this time to verify the proportion of patients complying with WHO recommendations on physical activity at 6 months post-discharge. Patients who would have been in the control-group will be proposed to enter in an out-patient (day-hospital) HIIT program. * Novelty 1. To use a new and strong risk marker of stroke relapse and post-stroke complications (mortality, morbidity, and poor functional outcomes), which is improved by physical activity, to strengthen the use of Aerobic Training (AT) in secondary prevention. 2. To allow generalization of conclusions: * by studying AT with a shorter intervention-design, limiting competition with neuro-rehabilitation (fatigue, time spent) and via a simple intervention-device (semi recumbent ergometer). (Indeed, most of non-ambulatory participants (82% ) in RCTs benefited from AT through assistive walking devices, using Weight Bearing Support Treadmill, which are difficult to set up (accessibility, personnel and equipment costs…)). * by studying AT effects in a more disabled population and at an early stage. (Indeed, in Randomized Controlled Studies having assessed AT in chronic (\>6months) post-stroke patients, NIHSS ≤ 5/42 was most often chosen for inclusion criterion, with a median NIHSS around 3 at study start.

Interventions

OTHERHIIT

High Intensity Interval Training On semi-recumbent ergocyclometer, after a symptom-limited graded exercise Test

OTHERLIGT

Low Intensity Group Training Group gymnastics, mainly with short static stretching/strengthening tasks.

Sponsors

Fondation de l'Avenir
CollaboratorOTHER
Hôpital Léon Bérard
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The evaluator of the main measurement criterion (Holter-ECG/24h) receives anonymous data by secure e-mail, without ever meeting the patients or their records. A blind component is introduced for patients, via the information given about a comparison between 2 types of physical activity.

Intervention model description

A randomized controlled 2-arms parallel trial, with intention-to-treat procedure.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* first-ever hemispheric stroke, with consistent clinical and neuroimaging signs * \<3 month * NIHSS \<20 in acute care

Exclusion criteria

* age\<18 years-old * diabetes mellitus complicated by neuropathy or autonomic dysfunction; or any other concomitant nervous system, cardiac or pulmonary disease possibly affecting the autonomic nervous system ie: * myocardial infarction\< 6 months, * myocardial dysfunction as severe dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, class 3 and 4 heart failure, * severe conduction abnormalities and arrhythmias, including chronic atrial fibrillation, * mechanical ventilation, * beta-blockers with no alternative options, pharmacological mandatory treatment possibly affecting the autonomic nervous system and HRV. * severe cognitive impairment inconsistent with free, informed and written consent or questionnaire filling

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SDNNWeek 1, Week 8, Month 6Standard Deviation of all Normal-to-Normal RR intervals, recorded with a 24h-Holter ECG.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HRVWeek 1, Week 8, Month 6Others data from the Heart Rate Variability analysis
Dose RatioWeek 2 to Week 7Delivered/Planned ratio, as Internal Acceptability
VO2peakWeek1 Vs Week 8VO2peak gain between the first and second CPET will be compared

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026