Skip to content

Perturbation Based Training And Bobath-Based Trunk Exercises On Gait , Postural Control And Mobility

Effects of Perturbation Based Training and Bobath-Based Trunk Exercises on Gait, Postural Control and Mobility in Post Stroke Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06130839
Enrollment
58
Registered
2023-11-14
Start date
2023-11-10
Completion date
2024-04-10
Last updated
2025-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

This study compares two approaches for rehabilitating stroke patients: Perturbation-Based Training and Bobath-Based Trunk Exercises. The perturbation based training focuses on challenging patients with unexpected movements to improve their balance and stability. While the Bobath method, concentrating on facilitating normal movement patterns. The study aims to determine which approach yields better outcomes in terms of trunk control, balance, and functional recovery for stroke patients. This study will also enable the individual to be more independent and minimize their falls.

Detailed description

Cerebrovascular is a leading cause of physical impairment and long-term disability in the globe. The complication of stroke is mobility impairment like balance, gait, and posture disorders. This impairment leads to a higher risk of falls, reduced ability in daily activities, and difficulty restoring the overall health and quality of life. Cerebrovascular accident is the second cause of fatality. Hence, one of the primary objectives in stroke rehabilitation is to restore postural stability and functional balance, which is a combination of dynamic, static and reactive balance. For improving postural stability and balance one such technique is the utilization of a rocker board, where a platform positioned on an unstable surface is used to challenge balance. Whilst rocker boards have been used effectively for, postural stability, injury prevention, rehabilitation and balance enhancement. Improvements in rocker board performance may be attributable to one or more of the following: muscle strengthening, enhanced intersegmental coordination, increase in brain activity in the supplementary motor area and/or enhanced feed-forward and feed-backward postural control mechanisms.

Interventions

Then intervention will be applied to the perturbation group as mention below at Rocker board (50 x 45 cm).the group will perform 36 sessions (4 times per week over 8 weeks) and effects of interventions will be measured before treatment, at 4th and after8th week (pre, mid and post intervention). Trunk control exercises on Rocker Board in standing position first in medio-lateral direction for 10 min and then in anterio-posterior direction for 10 min with breaks in between.

the group will perform 36 sessions (4 times per week over 8 weeks) and effects of interventions will be measured before treatment, at 4th and after 8th week (pre, mid and post intervention).

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

participants and outcome assessors will be kept blinded about the intervention which the patients will be going to recieve.

Intervention model description

Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Able to walk with or without ambulatory aids * Able to follow commands. * Patients in the subacute and chronic stages associated with stroke hemiparesis (time since * stroke onset 6 months- 1 year) * Scoring \> 21 on MMSE

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have severe limitations in passive range of motion at lower extremities * Visual and sensory deficits * Patient who has contracture * Orthopedic or any other neurological disorder which impair balance. * Patients undergoing any other balance training protocol. * Patients with recurrent strokes * Participants who are currently participating in another clinical trial or research study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trunk Impairment Scale6 weeksIt is used to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. The total score for TIS ranges between 0 for a minimal performance to 23 for a perfect performance Change will be measured from Baseline to 6 weeks
Timed Up and Go Test6 weeksIt is for the assessment of lower extremity function, mobility and fall risk. scoring criteria \< 10 seconds = normal. \< 20 seconds = good mobility; can walk outside alone; does not require a walking aid. \< 30 seconds = walking and balance problems; cannot walk outside alone; requires walking aid. Change will be measured from Baseline to 6 weeks
Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patient6 weeksIt is used for the assessments of postural control in stroke patients. It measures the ability of an individual with stroke to maintain stable postures and equilibrium during positional changes. It consists of a 4-point scale where the items are scored from 0 to 3, and the total scoring ranges from 0 to 36. Change will be measured from Baseline to 6 weeks
Functional Gait Assessment6 weeksIt is for assessment of postural stability during walk. 3 Normal is able to ambulate for 10 steps heel to toe with no staggering. 2 Mild impairment, ambulates 7-9 steps. 1 Moderate impairment, ambulates 4-7 steps. 0 Severe impairment, ambulates less than 4 steps heel to toe or cannot perform without assistance. Change will be measured from Baseline to 6 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire6 weeksIt evaluate self-efficacy as a result of being able to successfully perform a specific action in stroke patients. It is a self-reported questionnaire about level of confidence reported on a 0 to 10 scale (0 = not confident, 10 = very confident) when completing 13 activities of daily life following stroke. Change will be measured from Baseline to 6 weeks

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026