Skip to content

Comparing Suicide Prevention Interventions to Guide Follow-up Care: The SPRING Trial

Comparing the Effectiveness of Two-Way Caring Contacts Texts vs One-Way Caring Contacts Texts vs Enhanced Usual Care to Reduce Suicidal Behavior in Youth and Adults Screening At-Risk for Suicide in Primary Care or Behavioral Health Clinics

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06128239
Acronym
SPRING
Enrollment
854
Registered
2023-11-13
Start date
2023-12-29
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2025-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Suicide, Suicide Prevention, Suicide and Self-harm

Keywords

Caring Contacts, brief contact intervention, adult, adolescent, primary care, behavioral health, follow-up care

Brief summary

Pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two-way Caring Contacts text messages vs. one-way Caring Contacts text messages vs. enhanced usual care for suicide prevention in adults and adolescents.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCaring Contacts

Text message version of Motto's Caring Contacts intervention. The study will compare two versions of text-based Caring Contacts: two-way messages, to which participants can respond to receive text-based support from follow-up specialists, and one-way text messages, to which participants cannot respond.

Sponsors

American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Washington
CollaboratorOTHER
Idaho Crisis & Suicide Hotline
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Luke's Health System, Boise, Idaho
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Participants are aware of their own treatment condition but masked to the other two treatment conditions. Most investigators, including the senior statistician, are masked to treatment conditions.

Intervention model description

Participants randomized 1:1:1 to three treatment conditions

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adolescents (12-17 years old) and adults (18+) * Response of yes to at least one item on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) six-item screener at a St. Luke's Health System (SLHS) primary care or behavioral health clinic, or electronic health record or provider note from an eligible encounter indicates suicide risk * Ability to send and receive text messages * Ability to receive phone calls * Ability to receive emails * Participant and legal guardian (if applicable) speak, read, and understand English * Accommodations may be made for individuals with impaired hearing

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals who participated in a previous randomized controlled trial in the same health system related to Caring Contacts (SPARC Trial or MHAPPS Trial) * Patients who are unable or unwilling to provide informed consent\*, for example, due to acute or chronic cognitive impairment (i.e.: acute psychosis, intoxication, or intellectual disability). * Primary Care Provider, Behavioral Health Provider, or Principal Investigator determines that participation in the research is not in the best interest of the patient or the study team.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Suicidal behaviorBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsMeasured using the Harkavy-Asnis Suicide Scale (HASS) Active Suicidal Behavior Sub-Scale. The HASS has been validated for self-report, with strong psychometric properties in adolescents and adults. This measure asks about the frequency of suicide attempt planning, and actual and aborted/interrupted suicide attempts. Participants respond using the Likert scale response options used by Asarnow et al.'s validation study, modified to fit the survey time period (past six months at baseline/12-month outcome surveys, and past 3 months for 3- and 6-month outcome surveys). Each HASS sub-scale is scored separately by summing the response values. Scores on the Active Suicidal Behavior Sub-Scale range from 0 - 20, with higher scores corresponding to higher suicide risk. The primary outcome will be the cumulative risk of suicidal behavior assessed using area under the curve of the HASS scores over the 12-month study period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Suicide attemptsBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsSuicide attempts will be measured using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), which is valid for adolescents and adults.
Suicide ideationBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsSuicidal ideation will be measured using the Passive Suicidal Ideation Subscale of the Harkavy-Asnis Suicide Scale (HASS), which includes 12 items. Scores on the Passive Suicidal Ideation Sub-Scale range from 0 - 48, with higher scores corresponding to higher suicide risk.
Suicide-related Emergency Department (ED) utilization and hospitalizationBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsSuicide-related ED utilization and hospitalization will be assessed by self-report and using electronic medical records. Reason for visit/diagnoses may be reviewed in electronic medical records for any inpatient or outpatient encounters that occur during the study period.
Outpatient mental health treatmentBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsOutpatient mental health treatment will be self-reported and assessed using electronic medical records. Reason for visit/diagnoses may be reviewed in electronic medical records for any inpatient or outpatient encounters that occur during the study period.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-suicidal self-injuryBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsNon-suicidal self-injury will be measured with select items from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behavior Interview - Revised (SITBI-R). Each item is assessed individually, and items are not scored together in a scale.
All-cause ED utilization and hospitalizationsBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsThe number of and reason for visit/diagnoses for ED encounters and hospitalizations will be assessed using electronic medical records.
Thwarted belongingnessBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsThwarted belongingness will be measured using the 15-item version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire. The 15-item version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ15) is a validated tool to measure both perceived burdensomeness (PB) (6 items, scores range from 6 to 42) and thwarted belongingness (TB) (9 items; scores range from 9 to 63), which are related to desire for suicide. Individuals provide a self-report response to each of 15 items using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (Not at all true for me) to 7 (Very true for me). The appropriate items are reverse coded, and items are summed to calculate the TB and PB subscale scores with higher scores indicating greater TB and PB. Clinical Cutoff scores predicting desire for death are 35 or greater for TB and 19 or greater for PB. Clinical cutoff scores predicting desire for suicide are 50 or greater for TB and 30 or greater for PB.
All-cause mortalityBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsThe manner and cause/lethal means of all deaths including death by suicide will be assessed based on electronic medical records and vital records
Suicide AttemptsBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsSuicide attempts will also be measured with select items from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behavior Interview - Revised (SITBI-R). Each item is assessed individually, and items are not scored together in a scale. Some items are dichotomous (e.g.: ever vs never had a suicide attempt). Several items ask for an age or date when suicide attempts occurred. The number of reported suicide attempts ranges from 0+, with no upper limit to the range.
Completed suicideBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsThe manner and cause/lethal means of all deaths including death by suicide will be assessed based on electronic medical records and vital records
Perceived burdensomenessBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsPerceived burdensomeness will be measured using the 15-item version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire. The 15-item version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ15) is a validated tool to measure both perceived burdensomeness (PB) (6 items, scores range from 6 to 42) and thwarted belongingness (TB) (9 items; scores range from 9 to 63), which are related to desire for suicide. Individuals provide a self-report response to each of 15 items using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (Not at all true for me) to 7 (Very true for me). The appropriate items are reverse coded, and items are summed to calculate the TB and PB subscale scores with higher scores indicating greater TB and PB. Clinical Cutoff scores predicting desire for death are 35 or greater for TB and 19 or greater for PB. Clinical cutoff scores predicting desire for suicide are 50 or greater for TB and 30 or greater for PB.
Suicidal ideation & behaviorBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsA combined indicator of suicidal ideation and behavior will be assessed using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale self-report 6-item screener for primary care (C-SSRS) plus several additional items from the full Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (interview) (interrupted suicide attempts, self-aborted suicide attempts, actual suicide attempts, and suicide deaths). Scores range from 0 (no suicide risk indicated) to 10 (death by suicide), with higher scores indicating higher suicide risk.
Suicide attempts (including actual, aborted, or interrupted attempts)Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsThe frequency of suicide attempts (including actual attempts, interrupted attempts, and self-aborted attempts) will be measured using the two-item Suicide Attempts Sub-Scale of the Harkavy-Asnis Suicide Scale (HASS). Scores on the Suicide Attempts Sub-Scale range from 0 - 8, with higher scores corresponding to higher suicide risk.
Perceived mattering to othersBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsThe General Mattering Scale (GMS) will be used to assess the extent to which participants believe they matter to other people. Participants use a Likert scale from 1-4 to respond to each of five items. Scoring is completed by summing the responses, with results ranging from 5 to 20 and higher scores corresponding to higher levels of perceived mattering to others (better outcomes).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026